Opinion

Of National Conference And Nigeria’s Unity (1)

Published

12 years ago

April 14, 2014

Nigerians at home and in Diaspora have been
calling and agitating for a National Conference in order to brainstorm on issues threatening the unity and wellbeing of the country.
To this end, the Federal Government of Nigeria nominated and set up a 13-man advisory committee headed by Senator Femi Okurounmu. A four point terms of reference was also given to them which includes:
To consult expeditiously with all relevant stakeholders with a view to drawing up a feasible agenda for the proposed National Dialogue/conference.
To make recommendations to government, structure and modalities for the proposed National Dialogue/conference.
To make recommendations to government on how representation of various interest groups at the National Dialogue/conference will be determined.
To advise on a timeframe for the National Dialogue/conference.
The Committee was believed to have completed and delivered their assignment as instructed.
In view of this, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Mr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has inaugurated a 492 delegates led by Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi for the National Conference in order to pursue goals bordering on forms of government, structures of government, devolution of powers, revenue sharing, resource control, State and Local Government creation, State policing, boundary adjustment, fiscal federalism, indegenship, gender equality and Children’s Rights amongst others.
Delivering his inaugural speech, President Jonathan said that the National Conference would be an important avenue through which the voices of people should be heard pointing out that Nigerians have yearnings and aspirations or desires that needed to be discussed at the conference, and urged participants to table their thoughts and positions on such issues and make recommendations that would advance the unity of the country.
The conference, according to President Jonathan would compliment the effort of both the executive and National Assembly in marching towards a greater and stronger union for the country Nigeria, adding that the conference would not usurp the functions of the legislature.
He however, begged the delegates to jettison the poisonous mind-sets of the past, built on unhealthy competition among diverse groups and people and urged them to have a new mind and a new spirit of oneness and stop seeing Nigeria as a country of many groups and regions saying:
“Yesterday’s prejudices should die with yesterday. Today is a new day. This is the dawn of a new era. This is an opportunity to think anew”
The conference which kick-started on Monday 17 March, 2014 with its inauguration at the National Judicial Institute, Abuja is expected to gulp not less than N7 billion. Out of this sum, each delegate would be paid a total sum of N12 million for the 3 months, the conference is expected to last. That is, to say that each would receive N4 million per month for accommodation, transportation and part of their feeding since they were to have free lunch at the venue of the conference.
As some Nigerians began to raise alarm over the “waste of fund” on the conference, some of the delegates like Pastor Tunde Bakare and Barr. Olisa Agbakoba to mention but a few, declared that they were not after the money but on how to resolve issues of national interest threatening the well-being and unity of the country.
Many good talks and speeches have come and gone but what do we stand to gain in this conference? Is it not amazing to hear that some delegates were asking the Federal government to pay their aides? The said delegates claim that the N12m was meant for them and not their aides and were even asking for the number of aides to come with for the conference, arguing that aides to members of the National Assembly participating in the conference are being paid by the Federal government.
We have a long way to go ooh. Thank god for people like Hon. Ita Giwa who were able to recall that the present situation in the country emanated from past leaders who are also delegates to the conference. Can we then think or believe that these delegates otherwise known as 494 wise men will deliver us from the issues and challenges facing this country? Your answer can be “yes or No” but wait for a while, do not be in a haste to answer that simple but technical question.
It should be noted that most of the delegates were old time politicians who have served this country in one capacity or the other. We have Prof. Jerry Gana of the Almighty Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation Agency, the later being his baby, Senator Ken Nnamani former Senate President and the almighty Dr. Peter Odili former Governor of Rivers State amongst others; who are supposedly good materials for the conference but permit me to ask one question, can we talk about their individual leaderships and conducts before now? The good, the bad and the ugly? Can a Chamelion be constant with its colour? Can a leopard change its skin? This conference will tell.
Oragwa is of the Federal Information Centre, Port Harcourt.
In my thinking, the President of the Federation has done his beat by obeying the voices of Nigerians to constitute a National Conference which is also democratic. Butb come to think of it, what will an 80 year old man give Nigerians in this conference? Because the moment one is above 60, senile dementia sets in therefore, age has so many things to do with the issue at hand. For Christ sake, we have able bodied men capable of doing and saying something meaningful to the problem of this country, who should have been appointed as delegates. Not people that would go for their stomach and selfish interest or desire. Well, the inauguration is already done.
Recently, some groups like the Ogba land have disassociated themselves from the conference as a result of insufficient or lack of representation.
Some Nigerians are talking about true Federalism while some are talking about a parliamentary system of governance but which ever of the two, it can not be a solution to our problem until, we come to realize that if we need to be one Nigeria then, there is every need to kill ethnicity, tribalism, religion and other things that put us apart and stop pursuing shadows.
As long as the data and information demanded at the National, State or Local Government Levels contain State and Local government of origin, religion and their likes, Nigeria will continue to be in dichotomy.

The South is accusing the North of believing that the leadership of this country lies with them and that they are using resources from the south for their benefits while the North is accusing the South of hijacking the economy of the country. Nobody trusts each other, for example, immediately President Goodluck came on board, the Islamist insurgency which was already in existence though at a kitchen level, suddenly developed wings and came up in full force. Up till date nobody can give us concrete information about it neither has any of the sponsors being brought to book yet, some known personalities had sworn to make Goodluck’s administration ungovernable, while the Islamic insurgents in the North recently rejoiced that Professors, businessmen from the South would soon run leaving their sandals behind for them to inherit their booty. Are the sponsors of this group stronger than this country and are they above the law? That the law cannot catch up with them?
I expect delegates to the conference to be selfless in this service to the nation and use this opportunity to call for a whole-some constitutional amendments, find effective way of cushioning ignorance among Nigerians through public enlightenment that is not biased as well as finding a way for each to make sacrifice since participation comes at a cost while our mentality to self should also be deliberated on in order to create a new dawn as Mr. President rightly said.
I want to say that the Ministry of Information at both federal and state levels have all it takes to go into the rural areas for the purposes of education and enlightenment of the masses, if the platform is set for such works to be properly executed. The major assignment for all Nigerians and non Nigerians in this country is to ask this one outstanding question, what does it take for us to dwell together in unity? Are we able to remove these shadows that put us apart? Are we able to do it?
If I am allowed to suggest, I think there is need to call for a referendum to enable us decide whether we actually want to still be together or not in order to avoid forcing people who are already disintegrated to be fighting at the conference for nothing, looking for a lasting solution that would never be. Even though Mr. President has said disintegration of the country is a no go area but you and I know it is the only good and best thing that would happen in a country that does not believe one another.
Ukrain is about to, Sudan did, why would not Nigerians quietly and in good faith do same without shedding more innocent blood. At least the 100 years of amalgamation has been full of blood shed without trust and many groups rising from different regions for religious or ethnic jingoism and victimization. Please let us call “a spade a spade and not a garden spoon”. How long can we continue in this pretence, called “One Nigeria” when we know that we are not. May God help this country called NIGERIA!!

Oragwa Lovenda O.
For: Head of Centre,
Port Harcourt.

Lovenda Oragwa

Opinion

Monthly Environmental Sanitation Imperative

Published

2 days ago

May 18, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “A clean environment is not a government gift; it is a civic duty that protects our health, preserves our cities, and reflects our national character.”

For many Nigerians who grew up in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, the last Saturday of every month followed a familiar pattern. Roads were deserted, markets closed, and residents swept compounds, cleared gutters, cut overgrown weeds, and disposed off refuse. The monthly environmental sanitation exercise became a national ritual that promoted cleanliness, discipline, and civic responsibility. As an environment correspondent about two decades ago, I joined officials of the Rivers State Ministry of Environment on sanitation monitoring tours across Port Harcourt and surrounding communities. Although enforcement officers were sometimes accused of excesses, the exercise succeeded in creating public awareness about the importance of keeping our surroundings clean. Over time, however, the practice faded away in many states.

In its absence, indiscriminate dumping of refuse, blocked drainages and environmental neglect became increasingly common. Today, heaps of waste line roads, markets and motor parks, while gutters clogged with plastics contribute to perennial flooding. Given the mounting environmental challenges facing Nigerian cities, there is no better time to revive environmental sanitation. Its return is no longer a matter of nostalgia; it is a practical necessity for public health, environmental safety, and sustainable development. Poor sanitation remains a major cause of disease. Stagnant water and uncollected waste create breeding grounds for mosquitoes, flies and rodents, increasing the risk of malaria, cholera, typhoid and other infections. Floodwaters contaminated by refuse also expose communities to serious health hazards.

Rapid urbanisation has worsened the situation. Cities such as Lagos, Port Harcourt and Abuja are expanding faster than their waste management systems can cope. As populations grow, so does the volume of waste generated daily. Monthly sanitation exercises can help rebuild environmental consciousness. Beyond cleaning streets, they remind citizens that environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. They also offer an opportunity to educate children and young people about hygiene, public health and community participation. Critics argue that the old sanitation policy restricted movement and was sometimes abused by security personnel. Those concerns were valid, but they do not invalidate the concept itself. Rather than abandon it, governments should reform the programme to make it more humane, participatory and transparent.

That is why the recent decision by the Lagos State Government to reintroduce monthly sanitation deserves commendation. Even if participation is largely voluntary, the move sends a strong signal that environmental responsibility must be taken seriously. Other states should emulate this initiative. In Rivers State, the Rivers State Waste Management Agency has intensified efforts to improve waste collection and restore Port Harcourt’s reputation as the Garden City. Reintroducing monthly sanitation would complement these efforts and deepen public involvement. At the federal level, policies such as the Digital Waste Marketplace, the Plastic Waste Policy and the National Waste Management Network are commendable. However, environmental sanitation remains one of the most direct and visible ways to mobilise citizens toward cleaner communities.

The exercise, however, must be supported by efficient waste management infrastructure. Citizens cannot be expected to maintain clean surroundings if there are inadequate waste bins, irregular refuse collection, and limited recycling facilities. Governments at all levels should invest in modern waste management systems, properly fund sanitation agencies, and promote recycling programmes. Waste sorting should become standard practice to reduce the volume of refuse ending up in landfills and drainage channels. Countries such as Singapore, Sweden and South Korea have demonstrated that waste can become a valuable economic resource. Recycling industries in these countries create jobs while protecting the environment. Nigeria can adopt similar strategies and turn waste into wealth.

Environmental laws must also be enforced consistently. Regulations against illegal dumping exist in many states but are rarely implemented. Offenders should face penalties, but enforcement must be fair and free from extortion. Urban planning is another critical factor. Poor drainage systems, overcrowding and inadequate sewage infrastructure worsen sanitation problems. Governments must prioritise road construction, drainage maintenance and orderly urban development. Markets deserve particular attention. They generate enormous quantities of waste every day, yet many lack organised disposal systems. Local councils and market associations should work together to establish effective waste collection arrangements in commercial centres. Religious institutions, schools, traditional rulers and civil society groups also have important roles to play.

Environmental responsibility should be taught and reinforced as a social value. Community leaders can help change attitudes by consistently promoting cleaner habits. This issue is even more urgent in an era of climate change. Flooding, erosion and extreme weather events are already threatening many Nigerian communities. Poor waste disposal worsens these challenges by blocking waterways and reducing urban resilience. A clean environment also offers economic benefits. Well-maintained cities attract investors, tourists and businesses. Reduced disease outbreaks lower healthcare costs and improve productivity among workers and students. More importantly, cleanliness reflects national values. A nation that allows public spaces to deteriorate projects an image of disorder and neglect. Nigerians deserve cleaner streets, healthier neighbourhoods and safer communities.

Reviving environmental sanitation will not solve all environmental problems overnight, but it can serve as a powerful starting point. Combined with effective waste management, public education and stronger infrastructure, it can restore environmental consciousness across the country. Ultimately, environmental cleanliness is a shared responsibility. Government must provide leadership, infrastructure and enforcement, while citizens must demonstrate discipline and civic commitment. From disposing of household waste properly to keeping drains free of obstruction, every Nigerian has a role to play. If Nigeria is serious about protecting public health, reducing flooding and building livable cities, the return of monthly environmental sanitation is a step whose time has come.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

God’s Intentionality in Ecological System

Published

2 days ago

May 18, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole”.

From the very first chapter of Scripture, the Bible presents a profound truth: creation was not accidental, random, or without meaning. The universe emerged from the deliberate counsel of an all-wise God who fashioned every aspect of life with purpose and precision. The heavens were stretched out by His command, the earth was carefully positioned, the seas were bounded, and every living creature was assigned a distinct role within a perfectly coordinated ecological system. When God surveyed His completed work, He pronounced it “very good,” affirming that creation was whole, harmonious, and exactly as He intended. The natural world remains a visible testimony to God’s intentionality. The sun provides warmth and energy at the right intensity to sustain life. The moon governs tides and seasons. Trees absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen.

Rivers irrigate the land and quench thirst. Bees and butterflies pollinate crops. Birds disperse seeds. Animals maintain biodiversity. Every component of creation is interdependent, demonstrating that God designed nature as a balanced system in which each part contributes to the wellbeing of the whole. Nothing was made without significance, and nothing was left to chance. Among all created beings, humanity occupies a unique and privileged position. Unlike plants and animals, man was created in the image and likeness of God. This divine imprint endowed human beings with intelligence, moral consciousness, creativity, and the capacity for relationship with their maker. It also established mankind as the steward of creation. God granted humanity dominion over the earth, not as a license for reckless exploitation, but as a sacred trust to cultivate, protect, and preserve the world He had declared good.

Dominion, in God’s original intention, was to be exercised with wisdom, compassion, and responsibility. Human beings were meant to care for the land, use natural resources judiciously, and ensure that all forms of life flourished in accordance with divine order. The earth was to be managed as a trust from God, not plundered for selfish gain. Unfortunately, this divine mandate has been grossly misunderstood and widely abused. It is deeply regrettable that man has deviated so drastically from God’s original intention. Instead of stewardship, humanity has too often embraced greed. Instead of preservation, there has been exploitation. Instead of gratitude to the Creator, there has been reckless consumption and abuse of the environment. Across the world, forests are felled indiscriminately, rivers are contaminated, and fertile lands are stripped of their productivity.

Species disappear as habitats are destroyed. Air pollution threatens public health, and climate change disrupts weather patterns and livelihoods. What God created as a life-supporting ecosystem is increasingly treated as a disposable commodity. In Nigeria, the consequences are especially painful. Oil spills in the Niger Delta have devastated farmlands, poisoned rivers, and destroyed fishing communities. Poor waste management clogs drains and contributes to flooding. Erosion eats away homes and roads. Illegal mining and logging scar the landscape. In many cases, communities suffer while those responsible evade justice. At the root of much of this destruction is corruption. Funds earmarked for environmental protection, sanitation, and erosion control are often diverted for personal enrichment. Regulatory agencies are compromised through bribery.

Powerful individuals and corporations place profit above human welfare. Corruption thus becomes not only a moral failure but an assault on God’s creation. This environmental abuse is also a tragic expression of man’s inhumanity to man. When water is polluted, children fall sick. When farmlands are destroyed, farmers lose their means of survival. When rivers are contaminated, fishermen are plunged into poverty. When floods and erosion displace families, communities are torn apart. The burden of environmental degradation falls most heavily on the poor and vulnerable, while future generations inherit a diminished world. Yet, despite humanity’s failures, there remains hope for restoration. God’s purpose for creation has not changed. He still calls His people to responsible stewardship and righteous living. When individuals and nations return to God’s principles, they begin to view the earth not as an object to exploit, but as a sacred trust to preserve.

Responsible stewardship means protecting natural resources, planting trees, reducing pollution, disposing of waste properly, enforcing environmental laws, rejecting corruption, and treating others with justice and compassion. It requires governments to act with integrity, businesses to operate ethically, faith communities to teach creation care, and citizens to take personal responsibility for the environment. Creation care is therefore more than an environmental concern; it is a spiritual obligation. Our treatment of the earth and of one another reflects the sincerity of our reverence for God. To exploit nature, oppress the vulnerable, and enrich ourselves through corruption is to rebel against His purpose. To protect creation and uphold justice is to honor the Creator and participate in His original design. The world God made was declared “very good.” It is our solemn duty to ensure that our actions preserve rather than destroy that goodness.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

Confronting National Development In Chinese Style

Published

7 days ago

May 13, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “China’s rise was not a miracle. It was the result of deliberate planning, disciplined execution, and a national determination to make poverty reduction the foundation of national development.”

A short TikTok video by @ancientchinaforever recently offered a compelling summary of China’s remarkable transformation from one of the world’s poorest nations to a global economic powerhouse. In just a few minutes, it captured a lesson that developing countries like Nigeria cannot afford to ignore: meaningful development does not happen by chance. It is the product of vision, consistency, and a deliberate commitment to confronting poverty. In 1981, according to the World Bank, nearly 88 percent of China’s population lived in extreme poverty. The country was overwhelmingly rural, industrially weak, and lacking in modern infrastructure. Millions of people had limited access to quality healthcare, education, and basic social services. Yet China refused to accept poverty as its destiny. Its leaders made a strategic decision to treat poverty reduction as the starting point of national development.

Rather than relying on slogans or isolated welfare programmes, they created a coordinated system that mobilised government institutions at every level toward one overriding goal: improving the living conditions of ordinary citizens.

This was the turning point in China’s history. Poverty alleviation became a national mission. Clear targets were established, responsibilities were assigned to provincial and local governments, and officials were evaluated based on measurable results. Data was used to identify poor households, monitor progress, and adjust strategies where necessary.In effect, China built what may be described as a national development machine.The first major reforms focused on agriculture. Through the household responsibility system, farmers were given greater control over their land and allowed to sell surplus produce after meeting government quotas.

This policy created incentives for productivity and innovation. The results were dramatic. Agricultural output rose significantly, rural incomes increased, and millions were lifted out of poverty.With food security improving, China turned to industrialisation. The government established Special Economic Zones, most notably in Shenzhen, to attract foreign investment and promote export-driven manufacturing. What was once a small fishing community quickly transformed into one of the world’s leading industrial and technology hubs. Factories created millions of jobs, drawing workers from rural areas into expanding urban centres. China soon became the manufacturing capital of the world, producing electronics, textiles, machinery, and consumer goods for global markets.The revenue generated from industrial growth was reinvested in infrastructure and human development.

China understood that development requires more than factories. It demands modern infrastructure that connects people, goods, and markets. Massive investments were made in roads, railways, airports, seaports, electricity, and telecommunications.

Today, China’s high-speed rail system, modern cities, and efficient logistics networks stand as visible proof of decades of purposeful investment. Equally important was China’s commitment to education and healthcare.Schools were expanded, literacy improved, and vocational training equipped workers with the skills needed in a modern economy. Healthcare reforms reduced preventable diseases and protected families from being pushed deeper into poverty by medical costs.These investments ensured that economic growth translated into tangible improvements in living standards.

Another defining feature of China’s development model was policy continuity. Through successive Five-Year Plans, national priorities were clearly outlined and pursued over decades. While leaders changed, the core development agenda remained consistent. This stability encouraged investment, strengthened institutions, and allowed long-term projects to be completed. Unlike countries where each administration abandons the policies of its predecessor, China sustained a clear sense of direction.The results have been extraordinary. According to the World Bank, China has lifted more than 800 million people out of extreme poverty—the largest poverty reduction effort in human history. A broad middle class has emerged, and the country has become the world’s second-largest economy. Chinese companies such as Huawei Technologies and Alibaba Group now compete at the forefront of global innovation.

China’s journey has not been without challenges. Rapid industrialisation has contributed to environmental degradation, regional disparities, and demographic pressures. However, these challenges do not diminish the scale of its achievement. They underscore the complexity of transforming a nation of over one billion people. For Nigeria, China’s experience offers valuable lessons. First, poverty reduction must be treated as a strategic national priority rather than a campaign promise. Second, development requires long-term planning and policy continuity. Third, sustained investment in agriculture, infrastructure, education, and healthcare is essential. Fourth, institutions must be strengthened to ensure accountability and measurable outcomes. Finally, leadership must combine vision with disciplined execution. Nigeria is richly endowed with natural resources, entrepreneurial talent, and a youthful population.

What remains missing is a coherent and consistent development strategy that places national interest above politics. China’s transformation demonstrates that development is not a matter of luck. It is the outcome of clear priorities, effective institutions, and unwavering commitment. For countries still grappling with poverty and underdevelopment, China stands as compelling proof that when a nation confronts its challenges with strategic intent and collective discipline, extraordinary progress is possible.

Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi