Editorial
That NIS Recruitment Tragedy
Nigerians are unanimous in condemning the
handling of the recent recruitment into the
Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) following the death of applicants across the country. At the last count 18 applicants were confirmed dead, while several others were injured and hospitalised. Among the dead was a pregnant woman.
March 15, 2014, when the tragedy happened, was indeed a black day for the country. It was even more so because this would be the second time the same thing was happening under the same department of government. While the officials would want to see it as an accident, many Nigerian think it was nothing short of a product of criminal neglect.
Already, some people even organisations have demanded for the immediate sack of the Minister of Interior, Mr. Abba Moro and the Comptroller-General of NIS David Paraddang. Meanwhile, the Senate of the Federal Republic and a section of the public have called for a probe to forestall a repeat.
Similarly, President Goodluck Jonathan has ordered the cancellation of the result of the ill-fated interview, while the Head of the Civil Service Commission of the Federation is to head a committee that should conduct a fresh recruitment into the Nigeria Immigration Service.
While we salute the intervention of the President, it must go down on record that the shameful handling of a mere recruitment by the leadership of the Nigeria Immigration Service, even after an initial exercise that resulted in deaths is most unbecoming.
We also commend steps being put in place to reach out to families of the deceased and those hospitalised. While the injured may get automatic employment, some form of compensation would be paid to the families of those who died.
Good as these plans may be, they will not bring back the lives of the deceased, nor would they erase the dent it has placed on the good image of Nigeria. Indeed, that our public service would be seen to be incapable of conducting a safe and credible recruitment is terrible.
Clearly, the challenge of selecting candidates for less than 5,000 vacancies from more than two million candidates can be a challenge, but the rules on recruitment should adequately handle the situation. Indeed, the internet should make the process even easier.
In the first place, we cannot understand why applicants should be made to pay for recruitment forms. Also, we cannot understand why all the applicants should be crowded in three centres. Perhaps, there might also be some new wisdom in making candidates write an examination in the open stadia
For us, everything appears to have gone wrong from the beginning. Clearly, no excuse would suffice, as even the desperation theory that can legitimately be used against the candidates, should have been foreseen, anticipated and avoided.
Another issue that reasonable members of this country may wish to understand is why recruitments like this must be centralised. It is also something that calls for a study that over the years, government would ban employment until when the need for fresh hands becomes dire.
It is becoming almost frightening to ask if states or zonal leaders of these Federal Government departments cannot be trusted to fill vacancies as they appear. Would it be too much to ask that recruitments be done at that level every year, no matter how few.
Although, the millions that applied for this job may have showed how acute the un-employment situation has become in Nigeria, the apparent fight to the death for a public service job should serve to ginger the government to open the economy for a more liberal participation.
Even as a high powered probe may have been instituted to un-ravel the cause(s) of the tragedy and perhaps point a way forward, we think that the leadership of the Nigeria Immigration Service should face some sanctions to serve as a deterrent for others.
At that level of leadership, it will be catastrophic to imagine that they do not know what to do, even with a matter as ordinary as recruitment. At that level they cannot afford to take anything for granted or delegate its functions to a third party and go to sleep.
The Tide believes strongly that the tragedy was simply avoidable. We commiserate with the families of the deceased and pray for the many that narrowly survived. We join all well meaning Nigerians to pray that this does not happen again.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News2 days ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business2 days ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News2 days agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business2 days ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News2 days agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business2 days ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Business2 days ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
-
Politics2 days ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
