Connect with us

Opinion

Should FG Pay Unemployed Graduates Stipends?

Published

13 years ago

on

On a yearly basis, tertiary institutions in Nigeria churn out thousands of graduates without corresponding job opportunities. This situation has led to high rate of  unemployed graduates in the country. As a palliative measure, many people are canvassing payment of stipends to unemployed graduates. Our  Correspondent, Calista Ezeaku and photographer, Dele Obinna went to town to seek people’s opinions on this and they came back with these reactions.

 

Mr Chukwuma Ogaligbe – Public Servant

Federal Government should empower Nigerian  youths financially to start their own businesses. That is the only way to cut down the rate of crime and insecurity in the country. It is equally good that government pays the unemployed youths monthly stipends. But whether they are paying them stipends or giving them money to start businesses, they should make sure that they scrutinise the recipients very well to ensure that only people of good character benefit. Anybody that has bad character should not be considered. They can’t give money to a vagabond. or somebody who does not want to improve his life.

 

Mr Solomon Parakom – Media Practitioner

The Federal Government should not pay unemployed graduates stipends. Agreed there is high level of unemployment in the country, but if you pay somebody who is not working, you are encouraging laziness. The second reason is that government both at federal, State and local government levels cannot provide job for everybody. So, if you pay people who are not working, you are encouraging laziness. If they are graduates and they do not have job, they can create jobs for themselves, they can go into other areas.  It is not everybody that will be engaged in the white collar job. The level of crime in the country cannot go down by just paying stipends to unemployed youths.

The Federal Government does not have the statistics of unemployed persons in this country. So how many persons will you pay and how many will you leave out? Even those that you will be paying will still come back to say “you are yet to settle us.” So that kind of fraudulent practice can come in because there is no statistics.

So, the best thing to do is let government at all levels create jobs for those who want to work in the civil service, in the industries. And those who may not be readily accommodated in paid employment should be encouraged to go into other ventures to make a living.

 

Miss Chinenye Jones – Applicant

I think it is necessary for the Federal Government to start paying unemployed graduates stipends so as to support them. When you get out of school and you can’t get a job, it is usually difficult to get financial support from anywhere. Your parents or guardian may tell you that they have to focus on your younger ones. So, government should be able to help us out by paying us some amount of money at the end of every month. Even if it is N5,000.00, it will go a long way to help. That amount though small, will help an unemployed graduate carry on until he/she gets a job. This will also reduce crime rate and insecurity in the country because if somebody is expecting some money at the end of the month, would the person have any reason to go stealing or do anything bad?

 

Hon Princewill Enyinda – Politician/Agriculturalist

Yes, I think it is a good idea. If they can pay allowances to repentant militants whom everybody knows committed atrocities against the law of the land, even though they are also saying they were affected one way or the other, they were not supposed to take the law into their hands. But in the end, amnesty was granted to them and monies, salaries from the hard-earned tax payers’ money are paid to these guys, how about the unemployed graduates? So, it means people should carry arms and at the end, they will be granted amnesty and placed on monthly salaries.

So they  (government) should make their budget, bearing in mind the teaming unemployed youths and know how to carry them along. That is the only way the Federal Government can reduce crime and avoid crisis in the future. As we talk about unemployed graduates, we should also remember the non-graduates who are jobless. They should be encouraged to go into skills acquisition. The NDE has been there, the School-to-Land Programme has been for young school leavers.

They should resuscitate all these programmes. If they are given skills and empowered to start their own businesses, they will not require any stipends. They should get data of vulcanisers, mechanics, electricians, and others, think of how to ameliorate the suffering of these youths, so that all these restiveness, all this noise, kidnapping, stealing, armed robbery and all sorts of social vices will be reduced.

Many youths are ready to work, government should be able to get these people, confine them to a training programme, get them into farming programmes, they will excel. Government should revive the School-to-Land programmes, these will absorb thousands of youths. We have all the farms – Agbeta farm, and many others, they are all there in not less than 500 hectres of land lying waste. Why should they lie waste?

 

Miss Blessing Amadi – Civil Servant

Yes, it is a very good idea, at least some foreign countries are doing so. No matter how small it is, it will be helpful to the unemployed graduates. If they can be paid not less than N10,000.00 every month, pending when they get employment, it will really help them. Nigeria is a rich country and should be able to cater for unemployed ones. If the stipends are paid, it will surely help in reducing stealing and other social vices in the society. And I’m sure some of the recipients will be able to save a little amount every month and use it to start one business or the other.

 

Mr Ernest Orlu – Transporter

I’m not in support of the opinion that government should pay unemployed graduates stipends. We have many things they can do. Many of us who are managing the motor parks and driving taxes are all graduates. My chairman here is a second degree holder in education, yet he is driving taxi. There are things unemployed graduates can do to keep themselves busy. If government begins to pay stipends to unemployed graduates, it will make them lazy and they will not have the zeal to do something meaningful with their energy. Some developed countries are paying graduates stipends because their countries are already developed. We are yet to be developed. So we should continue to look for how to get ourselves developed by getting one thing or the other to do.

I am not in support of the payment of any stipend. Even the allowances paid ex-Niger Delta militants was a very big mistake that government made. I don’t think they will continue with it forever. Right now, they are looking for a way to get out of it.  Now, Boko Haram members are demanding for amnesty. Will government continue to pay criminals for committing crime? Will government grant Boko Haram amnesty for wanting to Islamise the entire country?

So, instead of all these amnesty and stipends, government should encourage more companies and industries to come into the country. During the fuel subsidy strike last year, President Goodluck Jonathan told us that three refineries will be built. Up till now, we have not seen them. If those three refineries are built, they will employ hundreds of unemployed graduates. The same goes for other companies that will spring up as a result of those refineries. To me, that is the only way unemployment in the country can be reduced. This will in turn reduce crime and insecurity in the country.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

6 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending