Editorial
Unongo And The Call For Amnesty
The call for amnesty for members of the Boko Haram terrorist group recently by elder statesman, Dr. Paul Unongo, at a forum of the Northern elders, is to say the least unfortunate and condemnable.
The Tide is particularly worried by the negative picture, Dr. Unongo’s statement tended to paint of the integrity of President Good1uck Jonathan as a sectional leader who, he said, had jettisoned his oath of office to protect lives and property of every Nigerian and has found pleasure in the seeming unabatting mass killings perpetrated by the radical Islamic sect.
Unongo, in his argument, alluded to impr ssions that series of bombing and senseless killings in the northern part of the country persisted because President Jonathan refused to grant amnesty to the Boko Haram sect, the same way amnesty was granted the Niger Delta militants by his predecessor, late President Umaru Musa Yar’ adua.
Pedestrian as such argument sounds, The Tide believes that Unongo may be trying too hard to please the core-north by simply re-echoing recommendation of the Presidential Committee on Security Challenges in the North-Eastern Zone, which was set up following the bombing by Boko Haram, in Abuja, to dent the nation’s 51 st Independence Anniversary celebrations.
While submitting its final report, the Federal Government panel headed by Ambassador Usman Gaji Galtimari had asked President Goodluck Jonathan to consider the granting of amnesty to members of the sect who may wish to surrender their arms to the Federal Government.
In that report which was widely abhorred by Nigerians, the committee recommended that “the Federal Government should consider the option of dialogue and negotiation which should be contingent upon the renunciation of all forms of violence and surrender of arms to be followed by rehabilitation”.
The committee also told Vice President Namadi Sambo, who received the final report on behalf of the President that the Jaamatus Ahlus Sunnah Lid Daawatis Wal Jihad, aka Boko Haram, has nominated the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Sa’ ad Abubakar III or his representative; the Emir ofBauchi and Sheik Abubakar GeroArgungu, as its representatives in any Federal Government team that will negotiate with its members. This was rejected by
BokoHaram.
We are indeed disturbed that people like Unongo cannot still see the difference between the Niger Delta struggles and the apparent act of terrorism that the Islamic extremists in the north are engaged in.
The Niger Delta militants took up arms owing to years of massive pauperisation through the destruction of their sources of livelihood, destruction of their eco- system over years of oil exploration and exploitation of petroleum in the region without the requisite development of the region.
But Boko Haram is a group of Islamic terrorists who believe that western or non-Islamic education is a sin and therefore decided to take up arms to destroy anything that is not Islamic or Sharia-based, they also seek to forcefully impose Sharia in all the states in the northern part of Nigeria. They have also destroyed schools and tended to disunite Nigeria by killing innocent christians.
Apart from the fact that Boko Haram has continued to be faceless and so amnesty cannot be considered, Unongo should have known that no where in the world are terrorists paid money to end their senseless behaviour against society. If Unongo’s logic was anything to go by, every ethnic group should carry arms to qualify for federal grants. This to us is senseless.
We feel bad that even the little that was left of the north in terms of commerce is being destroyed, and to mislead the northern youth, to destroy themselves the way they are doing is rather wicked. Someone should tell the north the plain truth that they are destroying their future.
As long as some Northerners continue to justify killings by Boko Haram either for political purposes or the usual scramble for the national cake, which they would do anything to ensure that they got the lion share even when they contribute next to nothing to the making of the cake, nothing will change.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
