Connect with us

Oil & Energy

PEF Bridges To Ensure Uniformity In Petroleum Prices (II)

Published

on

This is the continuation of the story published last  Monday, August 27, 2012

 

The Executive Secretary of the Petroleum Equalisation Fund
(PEF), Mrs Adefunke Kasali in this interview
with our correspondent  gives an
insight into the operation of the PEF. Excerpts:

 

Once that is done, the information immediately and
automatically to the server in our head office and when they scan the entire
document into the server and attach it here, our processing department
processes it and from there it goes electronically to audit and all the
verifiers and approval levels and straight into our e-payment system. It is the
first fully end-to-end operations and payment solutions anywhere in the
country.

Question:Is the equipment fool-proof and how do you deal
with the human factor?

Answer:The design is done to have little human interference.
Our depot representative at the loading facility may have to click on some
issues, which have been preset, so that he just picks.

Once a marketer is registered on our database and he comes
into our office to do some transactions, all the depot representatives have to
do is to just pick that information. The truck would have been registered and
that information is sitting on the server and all in all the devices. It’s not
subject to a lot of human manipulation and that is the beauty of it.

Question: What are you doing to ensure that all depots are
captured in the project?

Answer: Our plan is that it will be 100 per cent deployed.
Now we have achieved just 60 per cent of the depots that are Aquila-ready. We
are in the process of deploying to the other depots and it’s really proper that
we follow up on all the procurement processes that have sort of delayed us.

Yesterday, one of the MDs of the facilities called me and
asked when are you bringing Aquila because all his marketers are saying with
Aquila they can get their money more quickly because nobody wants to buy from a
facility where they are not PEF Aquila-ready.

We are working very hard to ensure that in the shortest
possible time, we have all the depots in the country that are doing petroleum
transaction on Aquila so that they can all enjoy the benefits of what
government is doing.

I can be specific that by end of November, we should have
all the depots ready because the last bit of the procurement processes is that
we should be having all the equipment in Abuja in for deployment by the end of
September.

In the new Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) what are the
assigned roles for PEF? The PIB as I have seen the PEF is still very much part
of the PIB that has been submitted by the executive to the legislative arm of
government. The roles will be clearer but basically, the mandate of the board
is still very much maintained by the PIB.

Question: The House of Representatives Committee on Public
Accounts ordered the management of PEF to refund N27 billion into the Federal
Government coffers within three months being 80 per cent of the operating
surpluses of the agency in the last five years. How far have you gone in this regard?

Answer: It is true that the House of Representatives Public
accounts invited the Board for a review of the 2009 accounts of the Board and
at that meeting, directed that the board should refund some money to the
federation account.

At that meeting, management tried to clarify the issues to
the members of the committee and I hope we still have an opportunity to discuss
the matter further.

PEF uses cash basis of accounting and so because the feeling
is that as a Fund, we should recognise what comes in and what goes out and that
is basically what cash basis accounting says.

Cash basis of accounting does not recognise receipts and
receivables that you are expecting and it basically does not recognise payables
that you haven’t been able to process and pay.

The starter of our payables as at the time these audited
accounts were submitted was not taken into recognition, so asking the board to
pay back money at that time doesn’t necessarily take into the account if the
money is still there. Because when you are looking back at an account, you do
not even know what that situation is a few years down the road. Needless to
say, the board has been given 90 days to do that.

Question: When an agency is asked to refund, the conclusion
is that some fraudulent practices must have taken place. Could you use the
occasion of this forum to set the records straight?

Answer: Certainly there was no untoward act, no corrupt act.
What the committee did was that if the board had receipts in the year at the
beginning or throughout the year and then the board then paid some monies out,
whatever was outstanding was considered surplus income. And that meant, for
instance, if one billion was outstanding that was not paid out, the committee
did not take into view that there could be 10 billion worth of claims waiting
to be paid at the end of the year.

Basically, they didn’t find very much that was wrong with
the account of the board except what they called surpluses and they then took
the position that those surpluses are supposed to be refunded to the federation
account and then supposed to be gotten out.

But the fund does not get money from the federation account
to pay its claims. So, if the money is returned into the federation account,
then the board will have an issue as to where the funding to pay the claims
when they are processed.

Question: Is this the same thing with the N20 million scam
on land? The committee also directed the board to refund another N20.22 million
within the same period for expenses incurred on a plot of land acquired in 2001
for its corporate head office but which was revoked by the Federal Capital
Development Authority, FCDA in 2006?

Answer:The other issue that was raised by the committee was
that in 2003 which predates my coming into the office, the FCT had allocated a
piece of land to the PEF for the purposes of developing its corporate
headquarters.

The files available to me actually indicate that the board
has prepared all the drawing and everything. It also forwarded all those things
to the appropriate department in the FCT for granting of a building plan
approval.

But before that could be done, the exercise that took place
around that time, the land was revoked and government took it back. I know that
when I came in 2007 as the executive secretary and I met that situation, I made
several attempts. In fact, I spoke to two past ministers of the FCTs and made
several vigorous attempts for us to get the land back and to develop the head
office.

But the House Committee has now taken the decision that
since the board had expended some of that money [20 million naira]… [cuts in]
and to the best of my knowledge a large chunk of that money was spent on
payment of license fee to the FCT, engineering design and drawing… the board
paid back and the N20 million into government coffers.

Question:How can the nation eradicate the issue of fuel
scarcity especially with the recent strikes by NUPENG, DAPPMA and JEPFON over
nonpayment of subsidy claims?

Answer: The issue of fuel scarcity is an issue of supply and
I think the focus that government has to rehabilitate and get our refineries up
and running efficiently is really the long term solution.

I know that there is a lot of work being done on getting the
refineries back, and the Turnaround Maintenance (TAM). The Honourable Minister
of Petroleum Resources had mentioned that contract for the TAM had been awarded
to the original builders of the refineries so that we can get the expertise
that went into building them the first place.

That is the long term solution when we have our refineries
working to meet our local demand then, the issue of distribution is easier.

Question: How can we ensure that petroleum products are not
diverted to neighbouring countries as it is commonly practised?

Answer:The issue like I said, is that of supply which is
ensuring that as much as possible we are refining what we produce in crude.
Also one of the benefits of Aquila is a truck that is headed for a particular
location cannot deliver to another location.

For instance, several marketers have said we are moving this
product to Suleja and it never arrives. Then they take it to another location.
When it gets in there and once our depot representative can’t even find it on
the server even if they try to receive that product through another means, it
won’t go.

So those are the things we are doing now to curb diversion.
Therefore, Aquila will curb a lot of that. Phase one of Aquila is depot to
depot, phase two is to ensure that when it leaves the receiving depot it ends
up in the retail outlet that it’s meant to go.

With this project over time, cases of diversion will be
really severely cut if not totally eliminated.

Question: How will the PIB affect operations in the oil and
gas industry?

Answer: I believe that the review of the laws and the
transformation plans will just help Nigeria. I believe that it will be good for
Nigeria.

As far as PEF is concerned as I said earlier, we have the
bill that has been presented to the National Assembly and our commitment to
Nigeria is that we will do whatever we need to do and work very hard to ensure
that the benefits that government had in mind in putting together PEF are
delivered to Nigerian public.

This is by way of our products being available in the retail
outlet s and also by way of cutting people who are exploiting the situation
that causes the products not being sold at the appropriate prices.

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

FG Inaugurates National Energy Master Plan Implementation Committee

Published

on

The Federal Government has inaugurated the National Energy Master Plan Implementation Committee (NEMiC), in a major step towards repositioning Nigeria’s energy sector.
Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, disclosed this in a Statement issued by the minister’s Senior Special Adviser, Robert Ngwu, in Abuja, at the Weekend.
According to the statement, the inauguration which marked the beginning of the full implementation phase of the National Energy Master Plan (NEMP), tasked the committee with the responsibility of spearheading the country’s transition to a cleaner, more inclusive and sustainable energy future.
Nnaji urged the committee to deliver real impact to households, industries, and communities nationwide.
“The National Energy Master plan is not just a document; it is a blueprint for transforming our energy landscape. NEMiC must fast-track the deployment of energy solutions that are reliable, affordable, and climate-friendly.
“The work you do will directly influence Nigeria’s economic growth, social progress, and environmental sustainability,” the minister said.
Nnaji expressed optimism that the committee would deliver on the assignment.
“The decisions and actions taken by this Committee will define Nigeria’s energy trajectory for decades to come.
“This is a responsibility of the highest order, and I am confident NEMiC has the capacity, the vision, and the commitment to rise to the occasion,” he said.
It would be noted that NEMP is a comprehensive framework designed to guide Nigeria’s energy diversification, strengthen energy security and align national development with global climate action goals.
Constituted on Oct. 17, 2024, by the Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN), NEMiC is tasked with mobilising funding and investing in renewable energy infrastructure.
It also has the responsibility of accelerating the deployment of technologies that expand access to reliable and affordable power.
The committee would oversee projects across solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and other emerging technologies while also advancing the operationalisation of the National Energy Fund, meant to channel resources into domestic energy efficiency and infrastructure projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

How Solar Canals Could Revolutionize the Water-Energy-Food Nexus

Published

on

Globally, demand for food, water, and energy is sharply on the rise. The World Economic Forum says that by 2050, food demand could increase by over 50%, energy by up to 19% and water by up to 30%. The increasing scarcity of these resources – and potential solutions to their sustainable management – are deeply interconnected, calling for integrated solutions.
“Disruption in one amplifies vulnerabilities and trade-offs in others,” wrote the World Economic Forum in a July report. “Such disruptions also create opportunities for sustainable growth, enhanced resilience and more equity.” The idea of synergistic nexus solutions is starting to pick up steam in both public and private sectors.
A new project in California, aptly named Project Nexus, aims to do just that. The novel project seeks to find synergies for water management and renewable energy production in some of the nation’s sunniest and most water-stressed agricultural lands by covering miles and miles of irrigation canals with solar panels, yielding multiple benefits for the water-energy-food nexus.
While the panels generate clean energy, they also shade the canals from the harsh desert sun, mitigating water loss to evaporation and discouraging the growth of aquatic weeds that can choke the waterways. Plus, the presence of the water acts as a built-in cooling system for the solar panels. The $20 million state-funded initiative could produce up to 1.6 megawatts of renewable energy “while producing a host of other benefits,” according to a report from SFGATE.
In addition to these benefits, placing solar panels on top of existing agricultural infrastructure could offer key benefits compared to standard solar farms. They are more easily and quickly greenlit, as they don’t face the same land-use conflicts that utility-scale solar farms are facing across the nation. Plus, “placing solar panels atop existing infrastructure doesn’t require altering the landscape, and the relatively small installations can be plugged into nearby distribution lines, avoiding the cumbersome process of connecting to the higher-voltage wires required for bigger undertakings,” reports Canary Media.
The result of Project Nexus and similar models appears to be a win-win for water, energy, and food, all while using less land. “The challenges of climate change are going to really force us to do more with a lot less … so this is just an example of the type of infrastructure that can make us more resilient,” says project scientist Brandi McKuin. While Project Nexus isn’t releasing figures on the project’s performance until they have a full year’s worth of data, McKuin says current analysis shows that the project is on track to meet its projected outputs.
Project Nexus is not the first project to place solar panels over canals, but it’s still among just a handful of such projects in the world. The United States’ first and only other solar canal project came online late last year in Arizona, where the project produces energy for the Pima and Maricopa tribes, collectively known as the Gila River Indian Community. While many large-scale renewable energy projects have run up against land-use issues with tribal lands, the Arizona project shows that the canal model can be an excellent alternative solution.
“Why disturb land that has sacred value when we could just put the solar panels over a canal and generate more efficient power?” David DeJong, director of the Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project, was quoted by Grist. In keeping with the spirit of water-energy nexus solutions, the Project is currently developing a water delivery system for the water-stressed Gila River Indian Community.
Of course, these pilot projects produce a whole lot less energy than utility-scale solar farms. But research suggests that if the solar canal idea is scaled across the United States’ 8,000 miles of federally owned canals and aqueducts, it could have a significant impact. In 2023, a coalition of environmental groups calculated that installing panels on all that existing federal infrastructure could generate over 25 gigawatts of energy and potentially avoid tens of billions of gallons of water evaporation at the same time.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Dangote Refinery Resumes Gantry Self-Collection Sales, Tuesday

Published

on

Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited has announced that it will resume self-collection gantry sales of petroleum products at its facility beginning tomorrow, Tuesday, September 23, 2025.

This is revealed in an email communication from the Group Commercial Operations Department of the company, and obtained by Newsmen, at the Weekend.

The decision marks a reversal of a directive issued earlier, which had suspended self-collection and compelled marketers to rely exclusively on the refinery’s Free Delivery Scheme.

The company explained that while gantry access is being reinstated, the free delivery service remains operational, with marketers encouraged to continue registering their outlets for direct supply at no additional cost.

The statement said “in reference to the earlier email communication on the suspension of the PMS self-collection gantry sales, please note that we will be resuming the self-collection gantry sales on the 23rd of September, 2025”.

Dangote Petroleum Refinery also apologised to its partners for any inconvenience the suspension may have caused, while assuring stakeholders of its commitment to improving efficiency and ensuring seamless supply.

“Meanwhile, please be informed that we are aggressively delivering on the free delivery scheme, and it is still open for registration. We encourage you to register your stations and pay for the product to be delivered directly to you for free. We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding,” it added.

It would be recalled that in September 18, 2025, Dangote refinery had suspended gantry-based self-collection of petroleum products at its depot. The move was designed to accelerate the adoption of its Free Delivery Scheme, which guarantees direct shipments of petroleum products to registered retail outlets across Nigeria.

 The company had also explained that the suspension would help curb transactions with unregistered marketers, either directly at its depot or indirectly through other licensed dealers.

The refinery stressed that the earlier decision was an operational adjustment aimed at streamlining efficiency in the downstream supply chain.

It further warned that any payments made after the effective suspension date would be rejected.
Continue Reading

Trending