Business
New NOSDRA Bill Stipulates N15bn Fine
The Senate has read for the second time a bill to amend the
National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) Act, providing
stiffer penalties for oil companies involved in both onshore and offshore
spills.
When the bill becomes law, oil spillers will pay as high as
N15bn as removal cost for spills occurring at any onshore facility, while those
occurring offshore will attract a removal cost not less than N5bn.
The bill also stipulates the cost per barrel of oil spilled,
depending on the vessels, facilities and places where the spills occur.
A tank vessel will attract not more than N50,000 penalty per
barrel of oil spilled; the fine for a vessel that is less than 3,000 gross
tonnes will be N100,000 per barrel; 3,000 gross tonne vessel, N150,000 per
barrel; and any other vessel, N250,000 per barrel.
The penalties are contained in four new sections (8, 9, 10
and 11) inserted as amendments in the principal Act.
In addition, Section 8(9) states, “Notwithstanding the
limitations established in section 8(1), all removal costs incurred by the
Federal Government of Nigeria or any state, local government, person or agency
in connection with a spill or substantial threat of a discharge of oil or gas
from any facility or vessel carrying oil or gas cargo from such a facility
shall be borne by the owner or operator of such facility or vessel.”
Presenting the lead debate, last wednesday sponsor of the
bill, Senator Abubakar Saraki, who is also the Chairman of the Senate Committee
on Environment, said the amendment of the NOSDRA Act of 2006 would strengthen
the institution and regulatory capacity of the agency to proactively manage oil
spill in a much more robust and effective manner.
He said it would also create a specific regime of penalties
and responsibilities for oil spills, while providing a consistent guide and
procedure for assessing and accessing compensation for oil spill and other
civil liabilities.
According to him, an effective legislative framework for oil
spill management needs to go far enough to ensure that apart from remedying the
environment, it can provide enough to ensure deterrent for bad environmental
behaviour.
Saraki said, “Oil spillage is not an oil business, it is an
environmental problem. Oil spill is not a necessary consequence of oil
exploration. It is an irresponsible environmental behaviour. The fact that it
is as a result of oil exploration does not detract from the impact on the
environment.
“Nigeria has lost over 13 million barrels of oil to
preventable spills. This is not the entire story. Rather, it is the story of
millions of Nigerians struggling to make ends meet, whose livelihood is
impacted by what is going on in the affected areas.”
“The story is that of destruction of the right of
communities to live in a safe environment, to live decently and in good health.
The full story is that we have ended up now victims of our own blessing because
the cost on our people is no longer about economics, now it is about lives,” he
added.
Saraki said the bill canvassed a robust penalty regime,
which would encourage environmental responsibility and care, adding that the
overall principle was that the polluter must pay.
“The benefit of this penalty regime is to cause operators to
take more care to avoid spills and take proactive steps to nip in the bud any
impending spill without much ado,”
Transport
Nigeria Rates 7th For Visa Application To France —–Schengen Visa
Transport
West Zone Aviation: Adibade Olaleye Sets For NANTA President
Business
Sugar Tax ‘ll Threaten Manufacturing Sector, Says CPPE
In a statement, the Chief Executive Officer, CPPE, Muda Yusuf, said while public health concerns such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases deserve attention, imposing an additional sugar-specific tax was economically risky and poorly suited to Nigeria’s current realities of high inflation, weak consumer purchasing power and rising production costs.
According to him, manufacturers in the non-alcoholic beverage segment are already facing heavy fiscal and cost pressures.
“The proposition of a sugar-specific tax is misplaced, economically risky, and weakly supported by empirical evidence, especially when viewed against Nigeria’s prevailing structural and macroeconomic realities.
The CPPE boss noted that retail prices of many non-alcoholic beverages have risen by about 50 per cent over the past two years, even without the introduction of new taxes, further squeezing consumers.
Yusuf further expressed reservation on the effectiveness of sugar taxes in addressing the root causes of non-communicable diseases in Nigeria.
-
Niger Delta5 days agoPDP Declares Edo Airline’s Plan As Misplaced Priority
-
Sports5 days agoSimba open Nwabali talks
-
Nation5 days agoHoS Hails Fubara Over Provision of Accommodation for Permanent Secretaries
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
Stakeholders Task INC Aspirants On Dev … As ELECO Promises Transparent, Credible Polls
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
Students Protest Non-indigene Appointment As Rector in C’River
-
Rivers5 days ago
Fubara Restates Continued Support For NYSC In Rivers
-
Oil & Energy5 days agoNUPRC Unveils Three-pillar Transformative Vision, Pledges Efficiency, Partnership
-
News5 days agoDiocese of Kalabari Set To Commence Kalabari University
