Connect with us

Politics

RSHA And Task Of Debt Management

Published

on

The Rivers State Government recently obtained a revolving loan of N200bn from banks for project execution in the State, with a plan of repayment through Internally Generated Revenue on an agreed interest rate.

The decision of the State Government  is in apparent conformity with the desire of the Rivers State Governor, Rt Hon. Chibuike  Amaechi to complete all projects initiated by his administration. In seeking the loan through a request of  approval  by the State House of Assembly, the Governor explained that it does not imply that Rivers State was broke, rather it became  necessary to meet up targets by ensuring that money is not a constraint to speedy delivery  of ongoing projects.

In the course of its deliberation and subsequent approvals of the two loan  requests, the Rivers State House of Assembly, certified that the internally Generated Revenue, (IGR) profile of the state was buoyant enough to service  the loans on agreeable terms. The State lawmakers also consented to the necessity of the loan in view of the “many people oriented project embarked upon by the Governor”. The Assembly therefore gave the governor smooth ride to stave off all distractions through its legislative backing.

Pundits and virulent  critics of the Government has however expressed reservation over its decision to obtain the loans, referring to it as “a booby trap for fiscal impropriety and profligacy in the State”.

In the general estimation of analysts, the  propensity for loan is a predisposition to mortgaging the economic future of the state to serving of accruing interest of accumulated loans.

Analysts believes that Rivers State by all standard is disposed financially to carry out projects without recourse to borrowing, and as such accuse the State Assembly of a tacit connivance to squander the state resources.

But the Rivers State House of Assembly Stand by its decision and as a follow up is exploiting its legislative will to augment governments decision and to get it appropriately channeled  towards accountable  governance. Recently the State Assembly initiated a bold move to forestall the looming prospect of a debt burden for the State.

The initiative came at the instance of the leader of the  Assembly Hon Chidi Iloyd  through a privately sponsored  bill, calling  for the establishment of a debt management office in the state. The bill referred  to as “Rivers State Debt  management  office (Establishment)  bill 2011”, is an initiative of the Emohua  born lawmaker to strengthen the Rivers State Government on borrowing and debt  management  to forestall a crippling debt burden in the  State.

Introducing the bill on the floor of the House, Hon Chidi Iloyd, said “the law is to provide for the raising of loans through the issuance of bonds, notes and  other debt securities and for connected purposes”.

He said the bill when passed as law; “will serve as a legal framework to guide the government in the raising of bond and loan for pursuance of projects, building of infrastructure for the economic development of the State”.

Reacting to public criticism of the bill, Hon Chidi Iloyd denied allegations that the bill stands to institutionalized profligacy in the spending of public fund, by giving limitless powers to the Governor to Squander the state. Hon Ilyod said the bill was part of the process of consolidating the state revenue based.

The bill had undergone its first and second readings on the floor of the house and it is presently been debated upon by members of the state Assembly.

The bill which has 27 clauses and 28 citations, came under debate on the  floor of the House after members gave it  proper perusal and digesting it details for proper deliberation.

While the lawmakers appreciated the fact that Government’s decision to borrow, presupposes the fact that there must be proper management of the loan obtained for fiscal propriety in the state, some of them expressed reservation on the workability of the bill.

In his contribution on the floor of the House, Hon Victor Ihunwo representing Port Harcourt constituency III called for the withdrawal of the bill on the grounds that it demerits out-weights it merits. Hon Ihunwo reasoned that beyond creating employment opportunities for Rivers people, “the  bill did not  include how the debt management will brief the House periodically to avert  the temptation of borrowing  by subsequent governments. He also argued  that the state do not require more borrowing.

Debating on the issue, Hon Golden Chioma kicked against  the recommendation that the Rivers State Commissioner for finance should be the head of the debt management office.

He called for an independent chairman for the office arguing that the state commissioner for finance was already saddled with executive  functions. He called for  fresh  nominees to appear before the House for screening for appointment as directors of the debt management office, while the Hon Commissioner for finance, the secretary to the State Government, (SSG) and the Accountant  General of the state should  serve as members.

Hon Chioma who supported the bill, said it was in line with ‘the federal government act which made provision for the establishment of debt  management office” while calling for  the domestication of the bill in Rivers State, he  said the five years duration of tenure  recommended for the directorate  should be  reduced to four years.

Hon Ikunyi Ibani of Andoni Constituency, supported the bill and stated that “if the government is committed to borrowing  it should also have a modified  means of repayment.

He thanked the leader for sponsoring the bill and tasked the Assembly on the need  for proper  monitoring of the loan facilities.

His words: “If  the Assembly  has power  to grant the executive  request to borrow it also has the power to regulate  the mode of  repayment”. Hon  Ibani also suggested  that the debt management  office should be established as a department in the Rivers State Ministry of Finance.

Hon Augustine Ngo of Abua Odual constituency who also supported the bill said it was timely and also provided  the opportunity for “the Assembly to  put the records straight and wade off criticism and media hypes over alleged endorsement of profligacy in public spending”. Hon Ngo also shared the same view with Hon Chioma that the  directors should be fresh nominees to be screened by the Assembly.

Hon (Dr) Innocent Barikor of  Gokana Constituency also supported the bill on the ground that  it will check the tendency  of abuse of public fund. He said people with proven integrity and the right technical expertise  should be appointed in the directorate.

Also contributing, Hon Belema Okpokiri, of Okrika constituency said  the establishment of the debt management office was necessary but suggested  that “overriding powers should be vested in the Assembly on the activities of the office”.

Hon Michael Chinda representing Obio/Akpor Constituency I, described the establishment of the debt management office as “part of Government planning strategy on debt  management.”

Hon Chinda  called for the inclusion of a clause in the bill stipulating that  “all debts incurred by a particular government should be zeroed to bearest  minimum, by ensuring that all such debts are liquidated within the last lapse of the  administration.” He also suggested that the Attorney  General of the State should be a member of the board of directorate of the debt management office.

Hon Gift Nwokocha of Ogba Egbema Ndoni Constituency I, supported the bill and pointed out that, “issues of debt management is necessary but it is important to know when it is necessary for the state to borrow and when not to borrow”.

The deputy speaker of the State House of Assembly, Hon Leyii Kwane who presided over the session, said  the bill debated on the floor of the house was critical to the development  of the  state, and added that members  will be given  due opportunities to contribute on the issue.

The Rivers State debt management office (establishment) bill 2011, is the first privately sponsored  bill since the resumption, of the  7th  House of Assembly in Rivers State. Subsequent deliberation of the House will determine if the bill will scale through as law.

Taneh Beemene

Continue Reading

Politics

LP Crisis: Ex-NWC Member Dumps Dumps Abure Faction

Published

on

A former National Organising Secretary of the Labour Party (LP), Mr Clement Ojukwu, has expressed regret that the several legal cases brought against the party since the 2023 general elections have impacted the party’s performance.

Mr Ojukwu, who recently returned to the interim National Working Committee led by Senator Esther Nenadi Usman, noted that the party had 34 elected members in the House of Representatives, eight Senators, and 80 members at the state Houses of Assembly after the 2023 general elections.

“Now we lost all of them,” he said. “I don’t think we have as many as five members in the National Assembly.”

The former national officer of the LP talked to journalists in Abuja and said he chose to join the caretaker committee led by Senator Nenadi-Usman because they are now the officially recognized leaders of the Party.

“I chose to work with the caretaker committee to help save the Labour Party, for the benefit of the party. I also want to use this chance to ask my colleagues at the national, state, and local government levels to come together and help rebuild our party.

“Another election is around the corner. We lost everything we have. They have left to other political parties. So I’ll reach out to all my friends in the other group to get together and work on making this party stronger again.

“The caretaker committee has formed a reconciliation committee. Let’s come together and talk so that we can restore the first opposition political party in Nigeria.”

Mr Ojukwu, who was part of the Julius Abure’s group, said there are no more factions in the LP.

He added, “There is a court ruling, and since it is valid, the right people are in the correct positions.”

He urged Barr Abure and others to drop the legal cases they have filed because they are not helping the party.

“Litigations are killing political parties”, he said. “They’ve seen many political parties disappear because of legal battles, and the Labor Party is losing support every day, which makes me feel sad.”

Mr Ojukwu said he did not think joining the Senator Nenadi-Usman’s NWC was a betrayal of the Abure group, describing himself as “the oxygen” of that faction.

“I’m with this group because of the verdict. But I never betrayed anybody. Rather, I was betrayed,” he added.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: NIGERIANS FAULT INEC ON DIGITAL MEMBERSHIP REGISTER DIRECTIVE 

Published

on

A number of Nigerians have strongly criticized the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for its directive to all political parties in the country to submit digitalized membership register within 32 days.
It would be recalled that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), following it’s reversed timetable, directed all political parties in the country to submit their digitalized membership registers within 32 days.
Speaking on the reversed timetable in an interview with The Tide in Port Harcourt, respondents said the directive amounted to disqualifying opposition political parties from fielding candidates in all the elections next year.
They said if the directives by the commission is implemented, only the All Progressives Congress (APC) would participate in the elections since it started it’s digital membership registration since February, last year.
Responding, an elder statesman in Rivers State, Chief Sunnie Chukumele, said the revised timetable was okay, but the timeframe for submission of digital membership register was being made at the wrong time.
Chief Chukumele said, for the past two years, all opposition political parties have been battling various issues in court, adding that they did not have the time to embark on membership drive, talk less of digitalizing their membership registers.
“My reaction is that the only issue with this revised timetable is the timeframe given by INEC for parties to submit digitalize memberships register in all the states of the federation, while giving notice of Congresses and convention. That is not possible”, he said.
He said only the ruling APC is likely to meet up with the directive, since it began its registration since last year.
Chief Chukumele, who is also the National Coordinator of Coalition of Rivers State Leaders of Thought (CORSLOT), alleged that the directive of the electoral body may have been targeted to prevent other parties from fielding candidates for the elections next year.
“When you say all the parties should submit digitalized registers of membership in 32 days, how will that be possible to conclude it in 32 days”, he queried.
He noted that “APC used one year ago to do, so APC has one year in the kitty plus 30 days. This is highly regrettable”.
The CORSLOT national leader urged the election umpire to do away with stringent conditions that will make it hard for opposition political parties to field candidates in the elections.
Also speaking, Mr Jacob Enware from Edo State queried the rationale behind the directive, especially when some opposition political parties are still having cases in court.
In his words, ”What opposition political parties are you talking about, is Labour Party not  in court or PDP that is yet to resolve their issues?
”For me, INEC should provide a level playing field for all, because aside the APC, no party can meet up this criteria.”
In his own response, Mr Nathaniel Ebere said he was not prepared to vote for anybody whether INEC provides a level playing field or not.
He alleged that his vote would not count, “so I will not waste my time”.
By: John Bibor
Continue Reading

Politics

IT’S A LIE, G-5 GOVS DIDN’T WIN ELECTION FOR TINUBU – SOWUNMI

Published

on

A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Convener of The Alternative, Otunba Segun Sowunmi, has expressed reservations about the political stance of Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, while calling for reconciliation among key party figures.
Otunba Sowunmi made the remarks during a television interview on Saturday, when asked about the relationship between Gov. Makinde and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Chief Nyesom Wike.
He said, “I don’t believe Seyi Makinde. Because I know them all. I’ve been in this party since it was registered. And I’ve been loyal, faithful, diligent with this party from the get-go, and I’ve never left.”
He underscored his longstanding commitment to the PDP, referencing prominent figures who had exited the party at different times: “I’ve had the grace, and the honor, and the dignity of watching even my father, Obasanjo, shed his card. As much as I love him, I didn’t leave the party”.
He added, “I’ve had the privilege of watching my beloved senior brother, Governor Gbenga Daniel, leave the party a few times. As much as I respect his vision and his ideas, I’ve never left. I’ve watched my former principal, Atiku Abubakar, leave a few times. I’ve never left.”
Otunba Sowunmi stressed that his comments were rooted in deep involvement with the party: “So when I talk about PDP, I’m not talking as an outsider, I’m talking as one of their totems, who was actually carrying them.”
He disclosed that he wrote to Makinde during the governor’s last birthday, urging reconciliation among a bloc of five governors who had formed a movement during the 2023 elections.
“At Governor Seyi Makinde’s last birthday, I wrote him a letter where I tried to say, look, you guys, the five of you, succeeded to the extent of creating a movement of your own”, he said.
He added, “And you fought very hard to make a point in the 2023 election. Although I don’t believe you won the election for the president, that’s a lie. They contributed, but I hate when people take the glory of other people’s work.”
Otunba Sowunmi warned that unresolved differences among the group could weaken the party: “You guys, you must go back to your four friends, your five friends, and you guys go and sort it out. Because not sorting it out with your five friends is going to leave the party worse off.”
He added, “But now that you’re fighting, or you’re not agreeing with yourselves, why don’t you go back to that same energy that allowed you to agree, so that you can use that energy inside to agree, and then we can lead the party.”
Continue Reading

Trending