Opinion

Nigeria And Leadership Panorama At 50 (II)

Published

15 years ago

October 6, 2010

The Ibrahim Babangida’s, regime was bloody with other inhuman acts. Evidently, the issue of eliminating a renowned journalist, Dele Giwa in 1986 for speaking the truth about a lady declared dead but found alive as published by the journalist. The bomb blasts in a military jet plane conveying future military hope of the nation on September 22, 1992 and many prominent Nigerians speak volumes of a bloody administration of IBB. Chief Mushood Abiola strongly and confidently protested for his rightful position following his success at the polls of June 12, 1993 forced IBB to voluntarily step aside in September, 1993 after the institution of the Interim National Government (ING) which was headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan as the eight head of state only for three months, before General Sani Abacha, the only hard nut in the cabinet of IBB regime, usurped authority from Shonekan and mounted the throne of leadership as the ninth head of state. Although, before IBB stepped aside, he created additional 12 states, making a total of 31 states as at 1987 and 1991, respectively. General Abacha behaved like King Belshazzar, who succeeded King Nebuchadnezzar of the kingdom of Babylon without learning from what had happened to his predecessor as he ended his life in a catastrophic manner after the handwriting on the wall – see Daniel chapter 5 for details.

Invariably, Abacha perpetuated the bloody trend of his master, IBB in different dimensions, and of course, he naturally reaped what he had sown on June 8, 1998 when the chills of death stopped his nefarious acts as Nigerians were in a cage under his wicked government. Without mincing words, Nigerians jubilated with a sigh of relief over the passing on of a tyrannical and dictatorial leadership of Abacha. However, before his demise, Abacha created more five states in 1996 to make up the 36 states of the federation.

Frankly speaking, leadership in Nigeria took a different shape when the Messianic pattern of rulership emerged in the person of the tenth erstwhile military Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar from June 8, 1998 through May 1999. As the Fourth Republic was highly expected to surface on October 1, 1999, the administration of Abdulsalami Abubakar diplomatically and surprisingly worked out all modalities and honourably handed over to the President-elect of the Fourth Republic or democratic governance of Chief Matthew Olusegun Obasanjo, who became the eleventh head of state on May 29, 1999. May 29th has been declared as Democracy Day throughout the sovereignty of Nigeria.

The government of OBJ has really enhanced the lives of Nigerians by providing job opportunities by the introduction of GSM technological and lucrative business which has made so many self employed in the labour market of a depressed economy. OBJ ruled from May 29, 1999 till May 29, 2007 when he cheerfully and courageously handed the leadership of the enduring democratic system of governance to Alhaji Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua, the twelfth in the series, who wheeled democracy until when he kicked the bucket on May 5, 2010. Obviously, President Yar’ Adua became ill and left the country for medical treatment in Saudi Arabia on 23rd November, 2009. In fact, the illness of the late president, after being away for over three months, raised concern to the citizens of Nigeria which attracted serious debate as to how the country would be properly administered.

After much debate based on Section 44 and 45 of the 1999 Constitution, the National Assembly declared the Vice President, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan as acting president in April, pending the recovery of the former. Meanwhile, as soon as Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua passed on on 5th May, 2010, the acting president was immediately sworn-in as a substantive president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria with effect from 6th May, 2010.

A month after, President Goodluck Jonathan, without hesitation, picked the former Governor of Kaduna State, Alhaji Namadi Sambo as his vice for the Presidential Villa. Realistically, before the demise of late President Yar’ Adua, President Jonathan had been very loyal to him, no wonder he was found fit to occupy the honourable and sensitive seat of the nation. Chronologically, this is how Nigeria has fared in terms of political leadership as giant of Africa for the past fifty years as a sovereign nation.

In summary, the height Nigeria has attained today should cause a sober reflection and chart a new and rebranded course of positive change for adequate conscientization of human resources and material development in order to enhance a free and democratic society; a just and egalitarian society; a united, strong and self reliant nation; a great and dynamic economy and emphatically, a land full of bright opportunities for all citizens. The factors or elements aforementioned cannot be realized as part of the proposed National Policy on the actualization of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in a state of rancor and acrimony.

Finally, it behoves one to passionately beckon on political stalwarts of this country to re-align their political consciousness, ambition and appropriately adapt to the rule of politics without bitterness in the enduring democratic governance as we reap the dividends for the past ten years. Undoubtedly, posterity will definitely account for the solid foundation laid today to build a virile and dynamic society with equity to the entire citizenry. Congratulations to our dear and undistorted sovereign nation – Nigeria since 1960. Long Live Federal Republic of Nigeria. Long Live the Presidency. Long Live Fellow Citizens.

Ominyanwa, a public affairs analyst, resides in Port Harcourt.

Goddy Ominyanwa

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari Road: Work In Progress

Published

2 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”This Dream project is one of the best things that have happened to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”

This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.

Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas, to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.

That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area, namely: Bukuma, Tombia, Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect 14 of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster, and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road. The people of the three local government areas will prefer to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.

Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru, the Ke and Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who had constructed the Central Group axis.

However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.

It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

That U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

2 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”

The first part of this story was published in our last edition.

In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.

Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.

Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent. For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.

If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.

Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.

Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Kudos Gov Fubara

Published

2 weeks ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area. This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.

The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people. He said, “our isolation is over.” That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.

The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.

Samuel Ebiye