Opinion
“Revisiting MDG And Poverty Eradication”
Poverty probably does not require explanation for a common man on any street in Nigerian city to appreciate.
The word poverty is a noun form of the adjectival morpheme ‘poor’ which, for instance, refers to having little or no money to address basic needs of life.
Poverty and its effects on human existence transcend human race and primordial considerations among humans the world over.
Poverty may not necessary mean lack of money alone as an individual can be poor in health, sight and in knowledge or wisdom as well as in spirit.
It is in this light that several sacred books such as the Holy Bible and Quoran use the word ‘poor’ to refer to many spiritual situations and conditions to provide spiritual understanding to believers as it concerns the will of God for mankind.
But in all, there is a common state of lack, want and eXigency that requires urgent attention.
Impelled by the need to address the adverse effects of poverty various nations across the globe have adopted measures to either reduce or eradicate poverty.
This is where the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) of the United Nations readily comes to mind.
The United Nations had on September eight, two thousand declared a global cooperation towards fighting poverty in the world.
It is on record that 189 heads of State and Government gathered at lhe United Nations headquarters in New York at the inception of the new millennium to reaffirm their faith in the world body and its charters to produce a peaceful, prosperous and egalitarian world and in turn midwife United Nations Millennium Declaration.
Accordingly, the world body identified not less than eight unambiguous goals namely eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, achieve universal primary education, reduce child mortality and gender equality and women empowerment.
Others include improved maternal health, combat HIV / AIDS, malaria and other diseases, and ensure environmental sustainability and development of global partnership for development.
An evaluation of the goals evinces a demonstration to eradicate poverty and hunger and its attendant challenges that could lead to poverty.
The United Nations described a poor individual “as poor if he earns and lives on less one dollar in a day”.
One dollar, a United State of America official currency is exchanged at the rate of one hundred and fifty naira to a dollar in Nigeria today.
The question that is probably begging for answer is: How many Nigerian workers nationwide earn about one hundred and fifty naira, an equivalent of one dollar per day let alone the unemployed.
Of course, there may be few politicians in the Presidency, National Assembly, Government Houses, state legislatures and petroleum exploration and servicing companies earning far above this target. The fact remains extreme poverty is evidenced in the nation.
No doubt, less than one dollar per day assessment justifies the fact that over 70 percent of Nigeria’s population is poor as indicated in 2007 and 2008 report of International Monetary Fund.
Worse still, the World Bank had severally ranked Nigeria low in the list of least developed economies while the challenge of poverty is even worse in rural communities than in urban centers.
It is also worrying that there exists a gross disparity in income within public service alone.
For instance, whereas President Goodluck Jonat n has approved an increase in the salaries of federal civil servants awaiting ratification by National Assembly staff particularly fresh graduates take home more than one hundred thousand nairay per month.
Surprisingly, even ex -militants on federal government’s list, take home sixty-five thousand naira an amount more than a civil servant on salary grade level ten in some states.
Nigeria as a nation has little or no social security scheme that provide intervention for its citizenry at various levels.
Concerning other goals such as provision of universal primary education and health needs of citizens, the attempts by government particularly atú the grassroots to embark on Millennium Development Goals is grossly inadequate.
Surprisingly, funding to attain millennium development goals by 2015 has remained a major challenge.
The United Nations requires that fifteen percent of annual budget should be dedicated to education and health but this is not the case in Nigeria and its states.
Even the case of security which many state governments claim they spend more funds the rate of insecurity as it affects kidnapping, assassination and armed robbery has shown that attention must be accorded the attainn1ent of Millennium Development Goals and above all poverty eradication.
Accorded the attainment of Millennium Development Goals and above all poverty eradication.
In this regard, the leadership and the political class must attach premium to funding of projects that have direct bearing with the wellbeing of citizens.
These include provision of steady electricity supply that would enable
industries manufacture goods at reg uired capacity, generate employment for the unemployed youths and provide basic social amenities for its citizenry.
The citizens must be vigilant and task their leaders to be accountable to them which would in turn eradicate corruption.
Millennium Development Goals desk should be created and made an integral part of public procurement and due process to create awareness in governance.
Government must decentralize primary health institutions and make them functional at the grassroots.
The public private partnership initiative must be transparent to attract the synergy of rich corporations and individuals in the global cooperation to produce a prosperous world.
Truly, Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) if properly pursued with vigor could combat insecurity in the nation today.
Sika is a Port Harcourt based journalist.
Baridorn Sika
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

Opinion
When Global Peace Hangs In The East

Opinion
Balancing Religious Freedom and Community Rights

Quote:”Communities have rights to peace, safety, and quality of life. Noise pollution, crowds, or other impacts from religious activities can affect these rights. Balancing these interests requires consideration and dialogue”.