Opinion
Enforcing Law Against Smoking In Public Places
There are several laws in Nigeria that exist only in principle. This is because since their enactment and passage they are never enforced. In fact, such laws exist only on paper and in the imagination of people who have a good memory about them but in reality they never did.
The heart beat of the non-smoking populace in Rivers State is that the law on Ban of Smoking in Public Places should not be consigned to history as one of such “bad” laws that lacked enforcement.
Indeed, the Rivers State House of Assembly, whose constitutional obligation it is to legislate on matters in the (best) interest of the people has over the period of its legislative sessions enacted laws which are considered to be in the best interest of the people of the state.
One of such laws is the Ban on Smoking in Public Places. This law is so fundamental and critical to life in view of the danger cigarette smoking poses to the health of both smokers and non-smokers.
The litany of clarion warnings by the federal ministry of Health that, “Smokers are liable to die young” heightens public anticipation for the quick passage of a law to stem the gory trend.
In fact, medical and health personnel aver that not only smokers but the non-smokers are vulnerable to the variegated cases of smoking in the public. No doubt, the Rivers State House of Assembly has done a good job.
This is why for anyone who savours and has regard for the sanctity of human lives, the enforcement of the law on Ban of Smoking in Public Places must be given teeth, and defaulters, no matter how highly placed in society, made to face the wrath of the law.
It is pertinent to state that since the state House of Assembly did not define what a “Public Place” is but reportedly relied on the provision of the “criminal code” on what constitutes in public place, it behoves the law enforcement agencies in the state, precisely the Nigerian Police, Rivers State Command to embark on a public enlightenment as to what the term “Public Place” denotes.
The enlightenment on the clause should not be left for public assumption thus creating a presentiment for flagrant violation of the law, though, “ignorance of the law is not an excuse to indulge in crime or misdeamenour with the intention of escaping justice.
It must be sounded that the law on the Ban of Smoking in Public Places is the people’s law, it will protect children from the nuseating consequences.
The benefit of the law cannot be exhausted in this article: it will stimulate lack of interest in smoking thus curbing the tendency of breeding a generation of smoking youths, it will reduce the number of tobacco – related deaths especially the unsuspecting public who are vulnerable to such ailments through smoking in public places. It helps to domesticate and legitimatise the federal ministry of health’s warning on the danger tobacco smoking poses to health. The law also gives temerity and effeontry to every resident in Rivers State, who has reasonable proof that his life is threatened, to challenge or take necessary legal action on anyone who recaclitrantly violates the law.
And if the law is enforced, in course of time, smoking will be so unappealing that people who hitherto were smokers or would –be smokers, will jettison the practice as unfashionable and sheer waste of money even as dissidents would be viewed as law-breakers risking prosecution and imprisonment.
Kudos therefore to the Rivers State House of Assembly and the contributors to the public hearing on this bill for its passage into law.
The ball is now in the court of the law enforcement agents in the state, I hope they cannot fail and truncate a million dollar process to rid our society of the danger smoking in the public poses.
May the Nigeria Police in particular carve a niche for itself by enforcing this law to the letter within the nooks and crannies of the state.
The Police should ensure that the principle of equality before the law holds sway. They should endeavour to enforce this law and reduce the associated risks.
However, where there is reasonable evidence that this law is not enforced, the state House of Assembly should as a matter of public interest call on the relevant law enforcement agents to brace up to this challenge.
Otherwise, resources pooled to come up with this law would be deemed wasted.
Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
