Editorial
Combating Discrimination
To end racism and all types of racial discrimination, the United Nations General Assembly declared 21st March each year as the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. The day aims to remind people of the terrible outcomes of racial intolerance and encourages them to recall their enormous responsibility and sheer determination to combat the ill.
The theme of this year is: “Youth Standing Up Against Racism”. It engages the public critically through #FightRacism, which aims to foster a worldwide tradition of tolerance, equality and anti-discrimination and calls on each one to stand against racial prejudice and illiberal attitudes. Nations should, therefore, join UNESCO to reject racism and investigate its root cause.
The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination was established six years after an occasion known as the Sharpeville tragedy or bloodbath in South Africa which caught considerable international attention. This event concerned police opening fire and killing 69 people at a peaceful demonstration against the apartheid ‘pass laws’ on March 21, 1960.
Since then, many people are still racially abused daily. In 2020 alone, there were several racist attacks on ethnic minority groups, from the horrible murder of George Floyd by white police officers to the consistent unwarranted criticism and abuse of Chinese people over the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. That is why days like International Day against Racism are necessary as fight against racial discrimination goes on.
The UN General Assembly reiterates that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights and feature the capability to contribute constructively to the improvement and wellness of their societies. In its most latest resolution, the General Assembly emphasised that any doctrine of racial superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and hazardous and ought to be renounced.
The world body has remained concerned with this issue since its foundation. The prohibition of racial discrimination is enshrined in all core international human rights instruments. The principle of equality also requires States to adopt special measures to eliminate conditions that cause or help to perpetuate racial discrimination.
One of the robust bastions against racism is education, recognition of the inanity of racial pseudo-theories, and know-how of crimes committed in the name of such prejudices throughout history. UNESCO must work with teachers, museums and publishers to resist stereotypes that stigmatise individuals and peoples because of the colour of their skin, their origin or affiliation. The world strongly needs the tools and instincts to fight racism and condemn it anywhere it occurs, from humiliation to aggravated violence. Racism is a critical problem, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge its destructive effects only.
Discrimination is a risky temptation that inventors of hatred recognise all too well how to exploit. The “next person” is always a handy scapegoat, and racial discrimination a dangerous temptation to use. UNESCO has to compel citizens to react and pass on the values of solidarity, empathy and altruism. Despite the boom in acts and the growing reputation of statements that encourage racism and hatred of others, we must be prepared to respond well.
Though discrimination in Nigeria is not racial-based, other forms of it exists. States and local governments unlawfully segregate against non-indigenes in ways that contravene the Constitution and global human rights law. Sadly, the Federal Government has done nothing to cut down these practices or reform federal policies that are themselves discriminatory.
Article 42 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution states that no Nigerian, solely on grounds of their “community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall be subjected either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government to disabilities or restrictions to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions are not made subject.” This language echoes similar guarantees enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
Policies that deny Nigerians the same access to employment and educational possibilities because they belong to a community whose origins are said to lie in some other parts of Nigeria, stand in open violation of those guarantees. International human rights law prohibits discrimination on many grounds, along with race, ethnicity and religion.
There has been an irrevocable alteration in the world of work by a huge entry of women into paid employment because of their fight to obtain economic equality. However, women’s education and professional attainments are yet to translate into substantial improvement. There exists serious limitations dealing with them in the workplace. The question is, how good enough are the laws, statutes and judicial responses to problems regarding Nigerian women in the workplace?
Furthermore, there is active discrimination by people who consider themselves as the authentic inhabitants of their region against settlers from other states which results in many violations of the right to equal opportunities, in particular employment, education and housing. We must closely observe the persistence of the Osu Caste system in the Eastern and Southern parts of the country. Efforts have to be made to get rid of these forms of discrimination.
Lopsided federal appointments largely based on religious and ethnic considerations, are a misshaping of the goals most central to Nigeria’s unique edition of federalism. The constitution clearly underscores inclusiveness and autonomy to ensure that the advantages of national citizenship are shared equitably throughout our intricate expanse of ethnic, cultural and religious multiplicity. It similarly promotes interregional equity and inclusiveness.
In a world of remarkable diversity, knowledge and reverence for others represent the solely feasible path. Building walls to keep other people out often means keeping ourselves closed in. Our divergence is strength. Therefore, we should quickly realise ways to draw on it for the resources of inventiveness, creativity and peace. It will be mutually beneficial if we respect and understand ourselves.
The prolonged suffering of Rivers State pensioners who have remained unpaid since retiring in July 2025 demands urgent executive and legislative intervention. The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has rightly put its finger on the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) as the root cause of this crisis. The state government must now bite the bullet, dismantle this failed experiment, and bring the pensioners’ protracted ordeal to an end.
Since July 2025, the affected retirees have been left high and dry, their monthly pensions unpaid, and their dignity worn away. The NLC, under the leadership of Comrade Alex Agwuanwon, has also linked this deplorable situation to the political storm that engulfed the state, while expressing cautious optimism that the prevailing calm will pave the way for the payment of outstanding arrears. The Tide shares that optimism. However, optimism alone will not put food on the table for men and women who gave the best years of their lives to the service of the state.
The genesis of this crisis is not shrouded in mystery. The CPS was introduced in Rivers State in 2012 under the administration of former Governor Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, pursuant to the Rivers State Pension Reform Law of that year. The scheme was ostensibly designed to bring the state into line with the federal Pension Reform Act of 2004, which had established a contributory framework for retirement benefits across the country. What was sold as a progressive reform has, in truth, become a millstone round the neck of the very workers it was meant to protect.
The CPS has failed in the state, and it has failed spectacularly. Its fundamental flaw lies in the government’s chronic inability, or unwillingness, to honour its counterpart funding obligations. The arrangement was meant to be a joint endeavour: employees contribute a portion of their salaries, and the employer matches it. But the state has consistently failed to keep its side of the bargain, leaving the pension fund anaemic and unable to meet its obligations. The result is as predictable as it is unconscionable. Retirees are left with only their own contributions to fall back on, a mere pittance that cannot see them through their twilight years.
The human cost of this institutional failure is staggering. Men and women who devoted decades to the civil service now find themselves cast adrift, their legitimate expectation of a secure retirement shattered. The psychological toll of such betrayal is beyond measure. A pension is not an act of charity. It is a contractual obligation, a deferred wage for services already rendered. To withhold it is to break a sacred trust. The authorities must understand that every delay in resolving this crisis costs lives, both in the literal sense as elderly retirees struggle to pay for healthcare and sustenance, and in the figurative sense as the social contract between the state and its workforce wears thinner with each passing month.
This development does not show the government in a favourable light. For a state to allow people who served it with dedication and integrity to languish in penury after retirement is morally indefensible. It sends a chilling message to serving civil servants that loyalty will be repaid with abandonment. This is precisely why organised labour must not rest on its oars. The NLC’s call for the termination of the CPS is not mere grandstanding. It is a necessary corrective. The scheme, as presently administered, is irredeemably broken and must be done away with.
The most damning indictment of the CPS since its inception is its one-sidedness. The government has failed to pay its counterpart funding, reducing the scheme to a hollow shell. Of what use is a contributory arrangement when only one party contributes? Retirees cannot be expected to live on the meagre sums they themselves set aside, sums which have been steadily eroded by inflation and administrative charges. Workers have been short-changed, left to carry the can while the government looked the other way. It is a quiet expropriation of their future.
The time to put this right is now in the interest of justice, equity, and fairness. The NLC should push harder for the swift implementation of its committee’s report to Governor Siminalayi Fubara. That report contains a sensible and pragmatic recommendation: that the CPS should apply only to those employed in the year it was enacted, thereby allowing existing civil servants to remain under the Defined Benefit Scheme (DBS) to which they were originally entitled. This is not a radical proposal. It is a reasonable compromise that recognises the legitimate expectations of long-serving workers and rights the wrongs of the past.
The authorities must act with dispatch. Governor Fubara should, without further ado, send a draft amendment of the Pension Law to the House of Assembly for passage into law. With such legislative intervention, those who retired from July 2025 to date would be returned to the DBS, receiving pensions calculated on their terminal salaries and years of service rather than the paltry sums available under the failed contributory arrangement. The NLC, for its part, should keep its foot on the pedal through dialogue, advocacy, and, if necessary, peaceful protest. Pensioners deserve not just fine words but concrete action.
Rivers State cannot lay claim to be progressive while its retirees are forced to go cap in hand for their rightful entitlements. The measure of any civilised society is how it treats its elderly. By that yardstick, the present situation is a blot on the state’s escutcheon. The government must clear the backlog of arrears, scrap the CPS for the category of workers it should never have applied to, and restore the DBS in full. Nothing less will suffice.
The recent public health disaster in Ondo State, which claimed 48 lives and left 182 people severely ill, is a gloomy reminder of the dangers posed by unregulated beverages. According to NAFDAC Director-General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, the victims consumed contaminated local alcoholic and herbal drinks in communities in Odigbo Local Government Area. The drinks contained high levels of industrial methanol, while 11 of 15 samples also contained Cannabis indica. The substances were linked to organ failure, neurological deterioration, and permanent blindness. The tragedy should serve as a warning to the entire country.
The incident underscores the wider problem of unregulated and adulterated drinks across Nigeria. From roadside kiosks and motor parks to informal markets, unverified alcoholic and herbal products are readily available, often marketed as cheap alternatives or medicines. The World Health Organisation estimates that about 25 per cent of alcohol consumed globally is unrecorded. Such products operate outside formal regulatory control and may expose consumers to toxic substances and serious health risks.
The problem is compounded by deliberate evasion of regulatory requirements. Products under NAFDAC’s mandate must be registered and subjected to regulatory checks before manufacture, distribution, or sale. Yet some producers ignore these requirements for profit, while others falsify NAFDAC registration numbers and markings and use them on substandard products. Such practices deceive consumers and undermine public confidence in the regulatory system.
The reported arrest of 15 suspects linked to the Ondo distribution network is an important first step. Those found responsible should be prosecuted and, where convicted, appropriately punished. However, enforcement must go beyond responding to tragedies. NAFDAC should strengthen preventive measures through regular post-market surveillance, random testing at transit points, and intelligence-led inspections of informal production centres.
Consumers also have a responsibility to exercise caution. Economic hardship, high inflation, and declining purchasing power have created opportunities for unscrupulous producers to market cheaper but potentially dangerous products. Consumers should, therefore, avoid unlabelled drinks, suspiciously cheap products, and goods sold through unverified outlets. Public education and consumer vigilance can help deny unscrupulous traders the opportunity to put profit before human life.
The danger extends beyond alcoholic and herbal drinks to medicines. Counterfeit and substandard medicines have entered both formal and informal supply chains, causing treatment failure, poisoning, and avoidable deaths. The WHO estimates that at least one in 10 medicines in low and middle-income countries is substandard or falsified, although the prevalence varies. Ensuring the safety and authenticity of medicines is essential to protecting lives and maintaining confidence in the healthcare system.
Food safety is another concern. Poor practices in food handling, processing, and preservation expose consumers to serious health risks, particularly when commercial interests override safety. Concerns over the improper use of chemical agents such as calcium carbide to accelerate the ripening of fruits further demonstrate the need for stronger monitoring throughout the food-supply chain.
These challenges expose weaknesses in Nigeria’s regulatory system and reinforce the need to strengthen it. NAFDAC faces the enormous task of monitoring products across all 774 local government areas. Meeting this challenge requires greater operational capacity, reduced bureaucratic delays, and modern systems capable of tracking regulated products from production to the point of sale.
Inadequate personnel, laboratory facilities, equipment, and logistics remain major obstacles. NAFDAC field offices, especially those serving remote communities, need modern testing equipment, reliable screening tools, and adequate transportation. The Federal Government should provide sustained funding to recruit specialised personnel, upgrade laboratories, and deploy technologies capable of rapidly detecting dangerous substances such as methanol.
Preventing the spread of adulterated products also requires coordinated action by federal and state governments. The Federal Ministry of Health, NAFDAC, and other relevant agencies should intensify operations to remove unregistered alcoholic and herbal products from motor parks, transit centres, and informal markets. The National Assembly should review existing laws and strengthen penalties for deliberately producing, falsifying, or distributing toxic and unregistered food, beverages, and medicines.
NAFDAC should expand its digital verification systems to enable consumers to confirm product registration before purchase. State ministries of health, local government councils, and community institutions should intensify grassroots education on the dangers of unlabelled drinks, unsafe food practices, and counterfeit medicines. Traditional, religious, and community leaders can also help identify and report illegal production and distribution activities.
The Ondo tragedy must not become another statistic that is quickly forgotten. The loss of 48 lives and the permanent blindness suffered by some survivors are devastating and unacceptable. Nigeria must respond by strengthening regulatory institutions, providing adequate funding, enforcing the law, and educating the public. A sustained, coordinated effort is essential to protect the nation’s food, beverage, and medicine supply chains and prevent another tragedy caused by products that should never have reached the market.