Opinion
Ridding Civil Service Of Corruption
Corruption means “dishonest or illegal behaviour, especially of people in authority, or the act of making somebody change from moral to immoral standards of behaviour”.
The world “corruption” is as old as mankind. So we need not bother ourselves about its origin. The area of concern should be its spread in dimension in different parts of the world at various times.
In Nigeria context, corruption has been so institutionalized that many Nigerians, either by act of omission or commission, have come to see corruption as a way of life. This is with the effect that corruption has grown into a full blown cancer which has spread and eaten deep into the fabric of the nation’s socio-economic and political strata.
Corruption has dehumanized and debilitated us as a people so much so that the image of an average Nigerian is badly battered within and outside Nigeria. It is now common place to hear average Nigerians talk about “the Nigerian factor” which has become an alias for corruption.
The situation is so bad that it may not be wrong for anybody to assume that corruption is an official policy in both public and private sectors in Nigeria. That is why, the poverty level with its attendant widespread disease, hunger and low life expectancy is at its highest in Nigeria.
People erroneously tend to associate corruption with public office holders only. This is not so, because corruption, being a state of the mind, does not recognize public or private sector. Take the act of bribery for instance, it is not limited to the public sector. A person from the private sector who offers bribe to the public officer is as guilty as the receiver.
Basically, corruption takes the form of the following: bribery, nepotism, extortion, gratification, absenteeism from work, misappropriation, embezzlement and stealing or looting. It includes inflation of contract value, falsification of ‘official record, ghost workforce, examination malpractices, hoarding, bunkering, smuggling, admission racketeering, diversion of funds etc.
The effects of corruption are deadlier and more dangerous than HIV/AIDS. This is because HIV/AIDS only kills an individual, whereas corruption kills a nation. Corruption has the capacity to breed all kinds of vices and societal degeneration. It brings about poverty, diseases and social insecurity. The infrastructural and security problems we have in the country today are also borne out of corruption.
Corruption is so pervasive that it affects all sectors of the economy, especially the public service, the organized private sector, civil societies and even religious organisations.
Lack of policy implementation and policy inconsistency are products of political corruption. While religious organisations are neck deep in monetization, the proliferation of civil societies in Nigeria has become an avenue to attract international donors. These are all off-shoots of corruption.
Corruption literarily is synonymous with lack of development and progress because by breeding and feeding on inefficiency, it generally strangles the system of social organisation.
For instance, corruption increases the cost of doing business because of the attendant red-tapism, unnecessary bureaucracy, kickbacks and gratification involved. The totality of these escalates the cost of living beyond the reach of ordinary Nigerians, hence the society becomes poverty-stricken.
Similarly, corruption creates breeding ground for lack of transparency and wanton abuse of office. Government businesses are conduted as business as usual, money exchanges hands with reckless abandon as the ‘smart’ and crooks dominate influential positions and further saturate the system with unqualified, incompetent and dubious cronies and relations.
Now, how can we remedy the situation? Successive administrations in Nigeria, in an attempt to grapple with the problems of corruption, have put in place various policies to combat it, but the successful implementation of such policies remains an albatross.
We have had such policies like War Against Indiscipline (WAI) during the Buhari/Idiagbon regime. The administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo had to its credit the establishment of two anti-graft agencies namely: Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). This bold step was one of the highest points of Obasanjo’s administration between 1999 and 2007.
Shortly before the creation of ICPC, Nigeria was rated the second most corrupt country in the world by the Transparency International; but with the advent of ICPC, the corruption index of Nigeria improved immensely. Since its creation, the commission has received over 5,000 petitions, prosecuted many of them and secured convictions in a good number of cases.
It is in its effort to get everybody involved in the war against corruption that the commission created the National Anti-Corruption Volunteer Corp (NAVAC) and the Anti-Corruption and Transparency Units (ACTU).
The NAVAC is the platform where the commission enlists honest and credible Nigerians who are passionate about the war against corruption to contribute their quota to rid Nigeria of corrupt practices. The ACTU, on the other hand, is a monitoring unit established by the commission in the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) of government at the federal, State and local government levels. Members of the ACTU are career civil servants who have distinguished themselves in the area of discipline, transparency and credibility.
The war against corruption in Nigeria will make more meaning if civil servants are actively involved. This is because the civil service is the engine room of government’s policies. A corrupt civil service is tantamount to poor policy implementation and poor service delivery.
I, therefore, urge the civil servants in the country to join the war against corruption by enlisting in NAVAC and more importantly by establishing ACTU in all the State Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).
Markson is a student of Port Harcourt Polytechnic, Rumuola.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
