Connect with us

Business

Free Meal Policy: What Impact, How Sustainable?

Published

on

The President Muhammadu Buhari led Federal Government appears ready to implement one of its campaign promises – the provision of free meals for primary school pupils in the country.
What impact will the project have on the education sector? How sustainable  is  it? These were some of the questions our Deputy Editor (Features), Calista Ezeaku put to some members of the public. Our photographer, Ken Nwuieh captured their images.
Lady Onyinye Mgbemena – Lecturer:
Since independence, governments have always formulated sound policies which to all intents and purposes are meant to advance the nation development wise, but midway through implementation, the policies are left to go moribund or entirely jettisoned. Sometimes after serving a pre-determined purpose as a result of several factors traceable most often than not to lack of continuity, being that many of our leaders consciously have not come to realize that government indeed is a continuum.
This brings to mind another set drawback which is lack of political will to faithfully implement policies as well as paucity of funds. Of course, there is the almighty corruption which has sucked in a good number of policies. Shedding more light  on corruption, policies selfishly conceived on the face value may seem good, but upon a little scratch, the real intention of the formulation which is to feather personal and financial interest is revealed. It is against the backdrop of this that I am persuaded to enthuse that the free meal policy, much as it is good, I view with great cynicism over doubt of its sustainability, I want to be proven wrong.
The beauty of this policy cannot be over emphasised. The overwhelming poverty in the land is taking a heavy toll on over 70% of the country’s population, most of which live below the poverty line and therefore can hardly afford a decent meal a day makes the feeding policy very compelling and quite apt at this stage of our nation’s development. It will no doubt afford a child better frame of mind to study without much distraction, with a concomitant boost in education.
Thus, all hands must be on deck to ensure the sustainability of this project and this will be achieved when it is prioritized. On this nexus, I urge government to ensure product management of resources allocated to the project. The inclement economic climate which has seen the price of plummet abysmally in the international market, rendering our economy comatose, makes the prioritisation necessary. Be that as it may. There is the need to create more awareness on the part of parent to send their children and wards to school without necessarily luring them to school using meal as a bait.
In the final analysis government should show more than a passing interest to ensure that the project which has begun in earnest in some pilot states does not become a flash in the pan.
Mrs Osaghae – Teacher: It is a welcome development in the sense that we are presently going through a period of very high cost of foodstuff and other items alongside retrenchment/downsizing of the workforce in many organizations. The effect of this is that several average homes will have to cut down on the number of meals they can offer. This will in turn imply that a good number of children would likely  be sent off to school without breakfast nor a lunch pack; maybe only with a few biscuits to sustain them through the school day. The rigours of academic work which often involves a lot of physical activity as well as mental energy puts a heavy demand on a child’s total energy, which is an end product of proper nutrition. Children and even a good number of adults cannot function optimally when hungry. Serving a meal to school children would therefore ensure that they would be able to concentrate properly and learning would continue to take place irrespective of the prevailing economic circumstance in our nation.
However, the sustainability of this scheme is not certain since it is not addressing the key issue s of unemployment and poverty. Sustainability would therefore be determined by the government of the day. When another regime is in office, they could think and act otherwise.

Alhaji Usman Ibrahim, – Chairman, Arewa Counsultative Forum, Rivers State:
It is a very good policy but I think there are other more important issues in the country that should have been tackled before we start talking of feeding of the pupils. First of all, the primary schools are supposed to be equipped with modern infrastructure and teaching materials. This will boost the primary school education in Nigeria. We are  also faced with the issue of insecurity especially here in Rivers State and we expect the Federal Government to intervene in solving the problem.
However, I still believe the free meal a day to pupils is a good development as it will help the children to be more focused in school. It will encourage them to go to school. It will also make the children to stay in school till the school dismisses. There are instances where pupils go on break and do not return to school. This will be minimized. The free meal policy will also encourage parents to send their children to school. With the current economic situation of the country, many parents can hardly afford one meal a day. So if they are sure that their children will be given one meal a day in school, they will be eager to send them to school.
I pray the programme will be sustained beyond Buhari’s government because in Nigeria we have the problem of continuity of government projects and programmes in Nigeria. And for the free meal a day to pupils programme to be sustained, there must be a proper funding of it. At the same time, the state Universal Basic Education should be involved in the programme. They should be involved in supervising the feeding to ensure that the right things are done. I will also suggest that the national assembly should make a law, compelling all further administration, to implement the policy. I will also advice that effort should be made to empower the parents financially, so that they will leave up to their responsibilities of feeding and catering for the children adequately.

Mrs Pat Opuebi – Civil Servant:-
With the way things are going now, I don’t think the project is sustainable. You see all promises they’ve been making to us, we are not seeing their fulfillment. So the possibility of the realisation of the free meal a day to pupils is very slim. I also feel they are going to politicize the project. So it might not go according to how it was planned. The project is a good one but my fear is that it will not be sustained. It will help the children educationally because sometimes the children leave the house on an empty stomach. Sometimes some of them steal their parents’ money to buy something and eat in school. But having that assurance that they will be fed in school, it will go a long way to help them.
So, I will advise the federal government to put measures in place to ensure that the project is sustained even beyond Buhari’s government.

Mr Kingsley Nnebara – Civil Servant :-
It is a good development if government can abide by the rules of that policy, not tomorrow they cannot continue with it. If they can sustain it, it is good. It will help the children. It will make them to be strong. If they did not eat at home and in school you give them one meal, it is good for them.

Chief Achor Owhonda – Businessman:-
The policy is a good one but I don’t see the feasibility considering the current economic situation of the country. Everything is going down. So I don’t see the Federal government being able to bear such burden in all the public schools in the country. The Federal government has been crying that there is no money and every sector is down sizing. So for the Federal government to say billions of naira has been set aside for this project, it means they have been lying to us. It means there is money. But if there is money, we should even invest it in some other sectors that will yield income, not to feed school children. Feeding of school children shouldn’t be our priority. It should be the responsibility of parents to feed their children. There are some specific food children eat at home and the free meal provided in school might not cater for that. So it will be a waste for Federal government to fund such project.
To me, I will say that rather than helping the children to learn, it will even cause distraction   because there is time for the  food to be served and time for the children to eat the food. So these periods are shorting the time they will use to learn. So it will distract children from learning. Considering  the number of children we have in public schools, it is not possible that the whole children will be fed during break. I’m also certain that the Federal government cannot sustain it. They might be able to manage it for moment but after sometimes it will collapse. Another point is that some people will milk from it. Some people will use it as a means of making money. So I am discouraging it. They should look for other areas to invest our money, not in feeding school children.
As a parent I will not be comfortable for my child to eat the free meal. I was listening to radio sometime ago and a story was told of how a cook in a secondary school in Lagos would blow her nose  inside the food she was cooking for the students. The students saw it and protested. That made some of the students to jettison boarding. That discouraged some of us. For instance, I boarded when I was a student but my children will never board because of such attitude.
You don’t know how the food they give them in school was prepared. They are not prepared in very hygienic environment, sometimes.  So if care is not taken, the free meal a day project might lead to food poisoning because of how and where they are prepared.
So, since the federal government  has already budgeted for the project, they should go ahead and try it. If not I would have advised that they should drop the idea.

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria’s Inflation Drops to 15.06%

Published

on

Three States Record Lowest rates Published 16 Mar 2026 By  Dave Ibemere 3 min read The NBS has revealed that inflation rates dropped again in February 2026 The bureau noted that both headline and food inflation eased on a year-on-year basis Inflation was lowest in Katsina, Imo, and Ebonyi, while the highest was recorded in Kogi.
 Nigerian economy, the stock market, and broader market trends. The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has revealed that Nigeria’s inflation rate slowed further in February 2026. According to the bureau in its latest CPI report, the headline inflation dropped slightly to 15.06% from 15.10% in January 2026. Nigeria’s inflation eases to 15%, offering relief to households. It was 11.21 percentage points lower than the 26.27% recorded in February 2025. From breaking news to viral moments.  On a month-on-month basis, inflation stood at 2.01% in February, up from -2.88% in January, showing that prices rose at a faster pace than the previous month. Nigerian stock market records weekly gain as turnover hits N164.8billion Urban vs Rural Inflation NBS noted that urban inflation stood at 15.53% year-on-year, down from 28.49% in February 2025, while rural inflation was 13.93%, compared with 22.73% in the same period last year. Every month, urban inflation rose to 2.55% in February from 2.72% in January, while rural inflation eased to 0.71% from -3.29%. Food Inflation Food inflation dropped to 12.12% year-on-year in February, down sharply from 26.98% in February 2025. Monthly, food prices rose by 4.69%, higher than the -6.02% recorded in January. The NBS attributed the moderation to slower price increases in staples such as beans, cassava tuber, yam flour, crayfish, millet flour, cowpeas, and okazi leaf. The twelve-month average for food inflation was 19.08%, compared with 37.40% in February 2025. States breakdown for All Items The states with the highest all-items inflation rates were: Kogi (23.57%) Benue (22.85%) Anambra (22.09%) The lowest rates were recorded in: READ ALSO Naira appreciates by N27 against US dollar as external reserves cross $50bn Katsina (7.78%) Imo (11.66%) Ebonyi (11.71%) On a month-on-month basis, the highest increases were in Enugu (5.92%), Ogun (4.39%), and Anambra (4.11%), while declines were seen in Zamfara (-2.14%), Bauchi (-1.23%), and Katsina (-1.06%). Food staples contribute less to inflation as prices moderate in February. Photo: Bloomberg Source: Getty Images State Breakdown for Food Inflation Food inflation was highest in: Kogi (26.91%) Adamawa (23.12%) Benue (21.89%) The lowest food inflation rates were seen in: Katsina (5.09%) Bauchi (7.09%) Imo (7.65%) Month-on-Month Food Inflation The states with the highest month-on-month increases in food inflation were: Bayelsa (8.81%) Ebonyi (8.51%) Edo (7.72%) The states that recorded declines were: Katsina (-0.70%) Nasarawa (0.17%) Kano (1.39%) Food price changes across markets in Nigeria Earlier, The  Tide source reported that due to Ramadan, staple food prices across the country are recording sharp increases as Muslims begin the Ramadan fasting season Ramadan is not only a period of abstinence from food and drink, but also a time for ‘reflection, discipline and heightened devotion’ Several traders in Abuja, Taraba, and Kaduna states are taking advantage and have hiked price. The NBS has revealed that inflation rates dropped again in February 2026 The bureau noted that both headline and food inflation eased on a year-on-year basis Inflation was lowest in Katsina, Imo, and Ebonyi, while the highest was recorded in Kogi.
Continue Reading

Business

NDCCTMA, NDDC MDS Challenge Niger Delta Indigenes On Investment In The Region 

Published

on

The Nigeria Delta Chamber of Commerce, Trade, Mines and Agriculture  (NDCCTMA), and the Niger Delta Development Commission ( NDDC ) have challenged Niger Delta entrepreneurs to close the gap in Gross Domestic Products (GDP) differences between the region and that of the South Western part of the country by coming home to invest.
The bodies made the call at a Business Round Table organized by NDDCTMA, in Port Harcourt.
Chairman of NDDCTMA, Ambassador Idaere Gogo Ogan, said to close the gap between the south west region which he said has a GDP seize of about #59 trillion and that of the Niger Delta which is about #34 trillion was to massively invest in the region.
He said no other persons can  do this except sons and daughters from the region.
“For me I believe in statistics,I believe in data and everyday I looked at the data concerning development in Nigeria and from the GDP point of view, the South West has #59 trillion, that is the seize of the south west region economy, the second region following them is the Niger Delta region with GDP seize of #34 trillion,so there is a yearning gap of #25 trillion that separates the south west and the Niger Delta region, that is why we are here.”
Ogan said the region has the capacity to close the gap and even surpassed it but regretted that indigenes of the region have chosen to ignore it in terms of investment.
“We need to close that gap .If we close that gap and even surpassed it,all the negative problems of militancy and unemployment will automatically erase”, he stated.
Ogan noted that the event was organized to remind the people that past efforts of militancy and agitations have not led the region to any where saying “that is why we are gathered here in this room”.
Also speaking, the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, NDDC, Dr Samuel Ogbuku urged indigenes of the region not to use the problem of insecurity as an excuse to continue to deny the region of investment  as every part of the country have in one time or the other experienced crisis.
Ogbuku said most indigenes have displayed high level of unpatriotism towards the region by taking investments that would have benefited the people to either Lagos or Abuja.
“With little threat we have left the city, we have gone to Lagos,we have moved  our families to Abuja and Lagos. If you go round GRA all the property, you will see,”to let to let”most of them are now empty “he said.
The NDDC MD said despite the fact that people from the region are doing well in the oil and gas, banking and other sectors, its impact are not being felt at home because they are stationed outside the region.
By; John Bibor
Continue Reading

Business

Cash Handouts Unproductive For Sustainable Agricultural Development – Engineer Kii

Published

on

Rivers State by its natural disposition is gifted with strategic economic advantage, particularly in  agricultural potentials and fortunes. This informs successive governments’ interest in  developing the agricultural sector, such as the School to Land Program, the Shongai Project, among several others.
The objective is to engender and leverage the sector  beyond mere subsistence practices into a full thriving economy, with the engagement and involvement of the youthful and productive population.
The Farm to Future Agro Based Training for Rivers youths by the present administration is notably one of the most pragmatic efforts of the Rivers State Government to engage the prospective creative capital of both the natural and human resources in the agricultural sector for sustainable development.
The concept, premised on the imperative of maximizing the huge agrarian prowess of the state, targets creation of sustainable livelihood for the teeming youth of the state. The project is also intended to achieve the chore needs of food sufficiency and job creation in the state.
This implies a significant deviation from the acculturised norm of expectations of financial benefits as the outcome of government programs and policies.
The tenets of the program are expressly difined in concept and practice as shown in the phases of its execution.
However, some beneficiaries of the project recently staged a protest, allegdging unpaid largesse, diversion of funds and perceived slighting by the Rivers State Ministry of agriculture. The said protest has stirred up concerns among stakeholders about how people view  government policies.
Many see the protest  as an attempt to create tension around the program and sabotage its original objectives.
Stakeholders and commentators are of the view that the Rivers State is in dire need of development in every critical sector, as such the  Ministry of Agriculture and its partners should be given the benefit of the doubt to implement the project to its logical conclusion without being hauled with accusations.
The former Commissioner for Agriculture, Engineer Victor Kii who was at the fore of driving the program has in a press statement debunked the allegations and sued for calm, restraint and understanding. Engineer Kii assured the participants that the empowerment phase will be implemented as soon as administrative normalcy is restored.
He commended the participants for their commitment and discipline during the training and urged them to uphold the norms of the program rather than misrepresenting its intentions.
Some pundits who commented on the recent development decried the fact that many people  still hold on to the notion that  incentives billed to create sustainable impact through skills based programs, should be given out as  largess, without adroit supervision of its utility function. This practice  has however created a culture of economic doldrum, dependency and servitude in the past.
Thus the idea of seen the Rivers Farm to Future project  as a mere quixotic experiment for cash benefits  without achieving set goals is counter productive. Such opportunistic thinking have stunted government efforts  over the years in achieving long term objectives of development.
As disclosed by the former commissioner for Agriculture in his detailed explanation, the Farm to Future project was strategically designed to address this culpable deficit in institutional planning and consolidation of results.
The former commissioner gave an  explicit description of the nexus of operation of the program.
As revealed by him;  ” The program is a strategic intervention to equip young people in Rivers with practical skills and to nurture a new generation of agricultural entrepreneurs. 500 beneficiaries received intensive agri business training in the first phase.”
 He pointed out that the program was conceived and designed in line with global best practices which de emphasizes indiscriminate cash handouts for beneficiaries. Rather it promotes practical engagements in agricultural activities and business initiatives.
At the end of the training in February, beneficiaries were encouraged either individually or in cooperative clusters to identify value chain for establishment of viable businesses.
They were also asked to produce structured business proposals for perusal and review by the ministry of agriculture and appointed consultants, after which successful proposals would be forwarded to the Bank of Agriculture with Rivers State Government providing guarantees.
The strategies for implementation include field inspections and evaluation for beneficiaries who had already commenced practical activities in identified locations.
The approach was to discourage the commonplace ideology of diverting funds meant for specific projects for unrelated purposes, thereby undermining the conscious exploration of creative potentials into long term benefits.
The process was however temporary interrupted by the dissolution of the Rivers State Executive Council and the ongoing renovation of the Rivers State Secretariat complex but the profound optimism and positive expectations that are the hallmark of the project remains sacrosanct.
Engineer Kii assures.
By: Beemene Taneh
Continue Reading

Trending