Oil & Energy

Mixed Feelings Trail Power Supply In Rivers

Published

11 years ago

January 5, 2015

Consumers of electricity
in Port Harcourt and its environs have expressed mixed feelings about the electricity supply by the Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company (PHEDC) during the Yuletide and the New Year celebrations.
The Tide gathered that in Diobu area of Port Harcourt, there was light during the 1st January celebration compared to the Christmas period.
One of the residents, Jacob Williams, said there was light on the eve of the new year being 31st December, adding that during the New Year Celebration, there was enough supply that lasted for over five hours.
Williams who lives at Dim street in mile III said, “it was better at New Year than during the Christmas Day. I commend PHEDC, but the company need to keep on improving.”
At Ogbunabali, Nneji Nwokokorom said “the new year was better in terms of power supply.” We had light for hours and that enable those living there to celebrate the new year better.”
Nwokokorom, however, remarked that even the supply on the new year for which he commended PHEDC is not adequate for such a global celebration. “We deserve 24 hours power supply, and until we get there, the government and Power distribution companies must not relent.’
But at Choba, Raymond Akpan, a resident said he has nothing to commend PHEDC for because there was no power supply during the New Year just as it was during the Christmas celebration.
“A company that is responsible, company that deserves payment for services rendered but PHEDC does not render services but it is always interested in issuing bills to its customers it is fraud and display of irresponsibility.
I expect the government to call the firm to order or withdraw whatever licence given to it.”
At Federal Estate, Agip Road in Mile IV, another resident also said there was no light in the area during the Christmas and New Year celebrations.
Anthony Ukwouoma, a resident of the area said “there was light in the Estate on 24th December Night, no light throughout Christmas and no light on New Year. It was on Saturday, being 2nd January that we saw light.
‘Can you imagine any responsible business outfit that display such level of irresponsibility and inhuman treatment for which they request for payments”, Ukwuoma stated.
In Borikiri, the old township, the residents said there was light on New Year Day but the light lasted for only few hours and that since then, there had not been light in the area.
“One can say New Year Day supply was better than that of Christmas. But is few hours power supply enough to earn PHEDC any commendation; queried Mr Jackson Philip.
Philip said for over 14 years he has been living in Borikiri, the area has not experienced such embarrassing supply than during this era of PHEDC.
When Power Holding Company of Nigeria was in place, the supply was better that what we experience now. PHEDC is more interested in revenue and not service to the customers.
At Rumuokoro, Rumuola, and Rumukurushi, The Tide gathered that PHEDC supplied light during the New Year though the supply never lasted but said the situation was better than during the Christmas Day.

Oil & Energy

No Subsidy In Oil, Gas Sector — NMDPRA

Published

1 week ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has said there are no subsidies in the oil and gas sector as Nigeria operates a completely deregulated market.

The Director, Public Affairs Department, NMDPRA, George Ene-Italy, made this known in an interview with newsmen, in Abuja, at the Weekend.

Reacting to the recent reports that the Federal Government has removed subsidies or increased the price of Compressed Natural Gas (CBG), Ene-Italy said, “What we have is a baseline price for our gas resources, including CNG as dictated by the Petroleum Industry Act”.

He insisted that as long as the prevailing CNG market price conforms to the baseline, then the pricing is legitimate.

Furthermore, the Presidential – Compressed Natural Gas Initiative (P-CNGI) had said that no directive or policy had been issued by the Federal Government to alter CNG pump prices.

The P-CNGI boss, Michael Oluwagbemi, emphasised that the recent pump price adjustments announced by certain operators were purely private-sector decisions and not the outcome of any government directive or policy.

For absolute clarity, it said that while pricing matters fell under the purview of the appropriate regulatory agencies, no directive or policy had been issued by the Federal Government to alter CNG pump prices.

The P-CNGI said its mandate, as directed by President Bola Tinubu, was to catalyse the development of the CNG mobility market and ensure the adoption of a cheaper, cleaner, and more sustainable alternative fuel and diesel nationwide.

Oil & Energy

‘Nigeria’s GDP’ll Hit $357bn, If Power Supply Gets To 8,000MW’

Published

1 week ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Managing Director, Financial Derivatives Company Limited (FDC), Bismarck Rewane, has said that Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) could rise to $357b if electricity supply would increase from the present 4.500MW to 8,000MW.

Rewane also noted that Nigeria has spent not less than $30 billion in the power sector in 26 years only to increase the country’s power generation by mere 500MW, from 4,500 MW in 1999 to 5,000MW in 2025 though the sector has installed capacity to generate 13,000 MW.

In his presentation at the Lagos Business School (LBS) Executive Breakfast Session, titled “Nigeria Bailout or Lights Out: The Power Sector in a Free Fall”, Rewane insisted that the way out for the power sector that has N4.3 trillion indebtedness to banks would be either a bailout or lights out for Nigeria with its attendant consequences.

He said, “According to the World Bank, a 1.0 per cent increase in electricity consumption is associated with a 0.5 to 0.6 per cent rise in GDP.

“If power supply rises to 8000MW, from current 4500MW, the bailout shifts money from government into investment, raising consumption and productivity. And, due to multiplier effects, GDP could rise to $357 billion.”

The FDC’s Chief Executive said “in the last 30 years, Nigeria has invested not less than $30 billon to solve an intractable power supply problem.

“The initiatives, which started in 1999 when the power generated from the grid was as low as 4,500MW, have proved to be a failure at best.

“Twenty-six years later, and after five presidential administrations, the country is still generating 5,000MW. Nigeria is ranked as being in the lowest percentile of electricity per capita in the world.

“The way out is a bailout, or it is lights out for Nigeria”, he warned.

He traced the origin of the huge debts of the power sector to its privatisation under President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, when many of the investors thought they had hit a jackpot, only to find out to their consternation that they had bought a poisoned chalice.

Rewane, who defined a bailout as “injection of money into a business or institution that would otherwise face an imminent collapse”, noted that the bailout may be injected as loans, subsidies, guarantees or equity for the purpose of stabilising markets, protect jobs and restore confidence.

He said, “The President has promised to consider a financial bailout for the Gencos and Discos. With a total indebtedness of N4.3 trillion to the banking system, the debt has shackled growth in the sector.”

Rewane warned that without implementing the bailouts for the power sector, the GENCOs and DISCOs would shut down at the risk of nationwide blackout.

Rewane, however, noted that implementing a bailout for the power sector could have a positive effect on the country’s economy if Nigeria’s actual power generation could rise from today’s 4,500 MW to around 8,000 and 10,000 MW.

The immediate gains, according to him, would include improved power generation and distribution capacity, more reliable electricity supply to homes and businesses as well as cost reflective tariffs.

Oil & Energy

NEITI Blames Oil, Gas Sector Theft On Mass Layoff

Published

1 week ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has blamed the increasing crude oil theft across the nation on the persistent layoff of skilled workers in the oil and gas sector.

The Executive Secretary, NEITI, Orji Ogbonnaya Orji, stated this during an interview with newsmen in Abuja.

Orji said from investigations, many of the retrenched workers, who possess rare technical skills in pipeline management and welding, often turn to illicit networks that steal crude from pipelines and offshore facilities.

In his words, “You can’t steal oil without skill. The pipelines are sometimes deep underwater. Nigerians trained in welding and pipeline management get laid off, and when they are jobless, they become available to those who want to steal crude”.

He explained that oil theft requires extraordinary expertise and is not the work of “ordinary people in the creeks”, stressing that most of those involved were once trained by the same industry they now undermine.

According to him, many retrenched workers have formed consortia and offer their services to oil thieves, further complicating efforts to secure production facilities.

“This is why we told the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) to take this seriously. The laying off of skilled labour in oil and gas must stop”, he added.

While noting that oil theft has reduced in recent times due to tighter security coordination, Orji warned, however, that the failure to address its root causes, including unemployment among technically trained oil workers would continue to expose the country to losses.

According to him, between 2021 and 2023, Nigeria lost 687.65 million barrels of crude to theft, according to NEITI’s latest report. Orji said though theft dropped by 73 per cent in 2023, with 7.6 million barrels stolen compared to 36.6 million barrels in 2022, the figure still translates to billions of dollars in lost revenues.

Orji emphasised that beyond revenue, crude oil theft also undermines national security, as proceeds are used to finance terrorism and money laundering.

“It’s more expensive to keep losing crude than to build the kind of monitoring infrastructure Saudi Arabia has. Nigeria has what it takes to do the same”, he stated.