Opinion
Of Social Media And Friendship (II)
In fact, some of the criminals post pictures on Social Me
dia that disguise they are beautiful girls or women, and propose friendship, business deals or purported meetings of huge benefit even when it is obvious they don’t know each other. Thousands of Nigerians have lost hard—earned money or properties under similar circumstances. These are some of the reasons why most of those who use the Social Media agree that it is not a safe platform to make friends.
Cybercriminal elements also use the social media platforms to perpetrate their dastardly acts by harking into the Websites of business organisations, agencies and institutions, and posting dubious information to unsuspecting members of the public. For instance, many job seekers have fallen prey to recruitment scams on Shell Nigeria, Total, Chevron, Mobil, and Agip, among other websites, including governments’.
Even so, however, corporate organisations, institutions, human, environmental and community rights groups, government agencies, departments and ministries, including politicians, use the Social Media as an additional platform to reach out to a wider spectrum of the population in order to disseminate their messages far and ensure that set goals are achieved within targeted timelines. Some businesses, institutions, agencies use the Social Media platforms to reach a large number of people, and create deeper penetration of the necessity to patronize or key into their strategies for increased dividends, customer base or appreciation of and support for set objectives.
But increasingly, business organisations, governments and politicians are deploying key Social Media tools to attract more customers, curry citizens’ cooperation and support to achieve desired aims. It is for this reason that United States President Barack Obama’s former White House Communications Director, Anita Dunn said: “If you are not communicating with Social Media, you are leaving a growing part of the population out of the conversation. It is not Social Media versus the conventional press. These are not competitive channels. It is an additive process.” Former US President, George Walker Bush’s White House Press Secretary, Dana Perino, agrees no less with Dunn that government should communicate more aggressively, using the Social Media platforms. According to Perino, “it enables government to act fairly quickly in replying to any news development or political attacks.”
Perhaps, it is necessary to state that Web pages, Social Media and mobile technology hold great potential to enhance communication between governments, journalists and citizens, because, government spokespersons can get more information out faster to more reporters, who now can be in a virtual rather than physical newsroom to receive it. Of course, governments can use tweets and blogs to clarify information, deal with rumours, and counter falsehoods and misinformation, just as officials can present government information, pictures and videos directly to the public, without going through the filter of the news media. Through the Social Media, they can as well directly solicit opinions of citizens and get their suggestions on programmes and policies.
“The Web drives information, and the need to present a unified message across many platforms is here to stay”, Dunn said, adding that “the days of monologue have ended. If you are not engaged in dialogue – and this is true for any institution, universities, retail outlets, and everybody – if you don’t invite people to talk to you, they have a lot of places they can go and talk about you.” Indeed, the Social Media doesn’t change the relationship or mode of interaction between information generators (news makers), purveyors and receivers (audiences); it only enhances their access to truth and objective information that enables the system function more effectively and efficiently.
Increasingly, governments, politicians, celebrities, corporate business, agencies, groups, are breaking news on mobile and social media. For instance, Presidential candidate, Barack Obama announced Senator Joe Biden as his vice presidential running mate by communicating “directly” with voters who had provided their email and text addresses. The US White House Press Office has broken news, such as a delay in a presidential trip, on Twitter. President Obama has taken questions in a town hall meeting on Facebook, and some political candidates have announced their campaigns on that social network.
Here in Nigeria, Senior Special Adviser to President Jonathan on Media and Publicity, Dr Reuben Abati, has announced Presidency’s position on certain issues, official trips, and actions, on Twitter. He has also responded to many questions by Nigerians on the President’s Facebook Page. Former Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nasir el-Rufai, had announced a near crash of Lagos-bound plane en-route Abuja, on Twitter. The same el-Rufai also announced the seizure of former Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Malam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, now Emir of Kano’s international passport by men of the Directorate of State Security (DSS) in Lagos, on Twitter; just as former Education Minister, Dr Oby Ezekwesili has repeatedly announced, on Twitter, attempts by men of the State Security Service (SSS) to silence her opposition to the Goodluck Jonathan administration’s handling of military’s effort to rescue more than 200 abducted Chibok girls by the Boko Haram Islamic sect since April 14, 2014.
It is important to note that Social Media can be a veritable tool for spreading information and reaching a large population, especially for corporate bodies, businesses, governments, agencies, institutions, and their like. These bodies also have control mechanisms for tracking and blocking unfriendly access to their Social Media platforms. This serves as a check to curb abuse.
But for the individual, who may not have such content control tools, the Social Media platforms are not a safe place to make new friends. Even on Facebook, it is recommended that you connect to people you already know, not strangers. The cases mentioned above are enough examples of how the Social Media tools have become very dangerous channels for making friends with people you don’t know at person-to-person level. This is why it is not advised as a safe place to make new friends.
James is an SS2 Student of Fatima College Borokiri, Port Harcourt.
Pelagie I. James
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News11 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News11 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Niger Delta10 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers8 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education9 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education9 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
