Opinion
Time To Review NYSC Scheme
Certainly, the idea to set up the National Youth Service Corp (NYSC) scheme by Yakubu Gowon’s administration in 1973 was most noble. After the Civil War, there was need to foster unity among the various ethnic groups in the country, and the need to reconstruct and rebuild the country. NYSC was considered as a viable means of promoting cross-cultural exchanges and interaction.
Over the years, the scheme has helped in building a strong tie between different ethnic groups in Nigeria as young graduates are posted to states other than their states of origin to serve their fatherland for a period of one year. Within this period, they interact with members of their host communities, learn their culture and also help in developing these communities.
Members of these communities on the other hand, take the corps members as their own. They welcome, protect and assist them wherever necessary.
However, recent happenings in the country have led to the question of whether or not the scheme is still relevant.
Records have it that several corps members had lost their lives in some crisis-prone states.
It is still fresh in our memories how about 42 corps members were butchered in some Northern states in connection with the April 2011 general elections.
Youth corps members serving as adhoc Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) staff were at the INEC office in Suleja, Niger State on April 8, this year, to check their postings for election duties when a bomb blast there killed 11 people instantly, while about 28 others were injured.
In Bauchi, many corps members were killed and some others attacked by hoodlums in riots that followed the April 16, 2011, presidential elections.
The sectarian attacks in Jos, Plateau State and others had claimed the lives of many corps members.
As the Islamic terrorist sect, Boko Haram carries out its activities unabated especially in the North-Eastern states, lives of the residents continue to be in danger. Their clandestine mode of operation seems to be overwhelming the Nigerian security agencies who are not even spared.
The sect had claimed responsibility for the killing of the low and the mighty. They had rendered many people homeless, made many children orphans and many women widows.
What then is the guarantee that they will spare the youth corps members, custodians of the western education which they detest so much?
In view of the growing insecurity situation in the country, there is need to review the scheme as the objectives that necessitated the establishment of the NYSC programme seem to have been defeated.
According to the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, “the scheme put in place to foster unity and develop common ties among the nation’s youths has turned into an avenue for the slaughtering of innocent citizens. The government would no longer fold its arm and watch innocent citizens sent to their early graves by unscrupulous elements while serving their fatherland. Of what gain is it when a child is killed in national service when the parents must have spent so much training him or her from primary school to the university?.
Indeed, why should NYSC scheme and the Federal Government insist on corps members being posted to the violence – prone states when people who live there are fleeing? Why should our promising young ones be forced to risk their lives in service to a nation that wouldn’t even protect them?
I think, the Federal Government should be more proactive towards ensuring peace in the country. They should see that the activities of Boko Haram are brought under control so as to make the states conducive for all.
Safety of corps members and the entire citizenry should indeed be of utmost importance to the country. No doubt, national integration is one of the motives of the scheme, but for this to be achieved, corps members need to be assured of their safety. They have to be alive to achieve the unity of the nation.
In the face of the security challenges, the NYSC Director-General and other heads of the scheme should seek the support of security agencies to provide adequate security for the corps members.
Most importantly, the scheme should consider the request made by some concerned Nigerians especially parents and corps members that corps members should no longer be posted to volatile areas. A recurring view that corps members should serve in their geo-political zones should also be considered.
Although, security agencies in the country claim to be on top of the ugly situation, it is important that the posting of corps members to the volatile states in the North remain suspended until the poor security situation improves.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education5 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education5 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Rivers19 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News19 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
