Editorial
National Confab: A National Challenge
As President Goodluck Jonathan
inaugurates the National Dialogue
Conference later today, Nigerians will once again have the opportunity to determine the future of the country. Though the inherent challenge may be many and demanding, all patriots must contribute to its success because the alternative to dialogue is crisis.
Giving the wave of pessimism, even opposition of the convocation of the conference recently, the reality of today can only prove that there is the finger of God in this national project. This is also not a surprise because it is the right thing to do, especially when a greater number of Nigerians want it.
While we commend Nigerians for the courage for taking this path, though potentially risky, we think that the resolve of the Federal Government on this matter is most commendable. Indeed, when the people decide on a thing, especially on a worthy cause, no devil can stand in their way.
The Tide expects therefore that all the reservations against the conference be dropped in favour of its success. We expect also that all those who may have gone to court to frustrate the process and those who had held back their participation, even their delegation to the conference would support this national effort.
We have no doubt that everyone that had raised a word of caution on this matter may have done so in good faith. But democracy demands that the will of the majority be respected. Besides, that previous attempts yielded very little success does not mean that this one would also fail. For the records, if this one fails, all Nigerians are to blame.
We are glad that the support for the conference had grown beyond expectation. Ethnic groups and other interest representatives whose members are not accommodated must understand that the membership of the conference cannot be endless. Apart from the fact that the current membership covers every conceivable interests, even the civil societies, there still exists a window to pass across views through other delegates.
Perhaps, this point will be best appreciated when one realises that delegates to the conference are not essentially there for their petty sectional interest, especially where it conflicts with national interest. The delegates should understand the unique responsibility they carry: They must be seen to be true Nigerians on a rescue mission and not ethnic and sectional war lords.
The National Conference is a place of national consensus and not battle field for the different ethnic, religious and social groups. The intention for the conference must be clear in the minds of all. Indeed, the prayer of every Nigerian should be for the Creator to imprint on their hearts that it’s about Nigeria and generations unborn.
That Nigeria has gone through, and is still confronted with challenges is not strange, every nation goes through same. What will be strange is that a nation as blessed as Nigeria is not able to reason together and set the rules for her future progress. Certainly, not when the world presents a plethora of examples to chose from.
The Tide is not looking forward to the articulation of ideas for a new national consciousness and rules that would bring Nigeria at par with the First World of this age: Nigeria is uniquely different, and our delegates must be driven by divine instinct to evolve ideas that will fashion out a new national order and make Nigeria the envy of all.
The National Dialogue also presents an opportunity for all those who have found nearly everything wrong in Nigeria to contribute. It is easy and even cheap to criticise, especially with a view to pull down. The time to show ingenuity, patriotism and faith has come. Let no good thought, strategy and spirit be kept from the conference. Nigeria must become a place of pride.
Even as we do not have any reason to suspect that the government has an agenda for the conference or that it may be diverting attention, every Nigerian would need to see that nothing of that nature happens. For those who query the timing, the words of Nelson Mandela that says: “the time is always right to do right,” should be a guide.
For the delegates, this is a mission of no return. Not an era when people walk out because their demands are not immediately accommodated. The conference must go through all the issues presented and a review done to correct previous oversights than hurriedly walk out. This is a challenge we must leverage on.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
Politics5 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics5 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics5 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News5 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News19 hours ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business22 hours ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News19 hours agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business22 hours ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
