Editorial
Task Before New EFCC Chairman
To the relief of Nigerians, a new substantive helmsman, Abdulrasheed Bawa, was confirmed for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) by the Senate on February 24 this year following his nomination on February 16 by President Muhammadu Buhari. Born on April 30, 1980, Bawa who holds degrees in Economics and International Affairs and Diplomacy joined the EFCC as a cadet Assistant Detective Superintendent in 2004 and rose to Deputy Chief Detective Superintendent before his appointment.
In the about 18 years of the anti-graft agency’s existence, the new boss is the 6th in line and not just the youngest but also the only one from the ranks of the organisation and without a police background to head the agency.
Against the backdrop of the fact that one of his predecessors, Ibrahim Magu, who acted as chairman for five years and had his confirmation rejected by the Senate twice, Bawa’s smooth confirmation by the upper legislative chamber could be interpreted as a vote of confidence by the Nigerian people on his capacity and competence to steer the ship of the arrowhead of the anti-corruption war in the country.
With a track record of hardwork, diligence and high level performance on the job, the feeling in many quarters is that Bawa is the man for the assignment to lead the agency at this moment in time.
At just 40 years of age, the new anti-corruption czar’s appointment represents a confidence vote on the youth and their competence to contribute significantly to the development of the nation. While this vote also represents a test of the younger generation’s ability to take responsibility, it as well places a burden on the youth to determine the economic health of the nation going forward. Bawa, therefore, owes his generation a duty to discharge.
As a Certified Fraud Examiner (CRE); Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS) who has received training from various institutions such as the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN); the World Bank; the United Nations Office of Drug and Crimes and the United Kingdom’s Global Training Consulting, among others, Bawa’s technical and professional competence can be said to be solid. What is, however, needed of him is the skill to manage the men and materials at his disposal, majority of whom are police officers, to achieve set goals.
Though the EFCC may not be said to have failed in delivering on its mandate, the perception among many Nigerians is that it could do better, especially in such areas as being accountable to the public, management of resources and political interference in its affairs. Under Bawa, the EFCC must be re-organised and refocused to achieve results rather than playing to the gallery with emphasis on trying suspects in the media.
Especially in the last five years or so, the commission had been plagued with some issues bordering on reputation with cases of conflict of interest among staffers. Bawa will have to put his feet down to enforce strict discipline among his operatives and also refuse to be used by politicians to witch hunt political opponents.
It is on record that none of his predecessors lasted a full term in office in substantive capacity. The new EFCC boss must do well to change that narrative. To achieve this, he must be independent-minded and avoid getting too close or familiar with politicians. To achieve desired results, Bawa must also remain resolute and refuse to pander to sectional interests or such other considerations that will compromise his integrity.
To this end, he must continue on the path of pursuing corrupt politicians, the recovery of stolen assets and conviction of tainted government officials and their allies with even renewed vigour and determination. Nobody should be considered too big or too powerful for the EFCC to investigate and prosecute whenever there is a need for it. The EFCC must be built into an organisation that sends shivers down the spine of corrupt-minded Nigerians, irrespective of their status and position in the society.
The expectation among Nigerians is that Bawa will not rest on his laurels as the head of the EFCC’s investigations of Diezani Allison-Madueke (from 2015 till date) that recovered millions of dollars’ worth of property in Nigeria, the United Kingdom, USA and UAE; supervision of the investigations of Atlantic Energy Group that led to the recovery of assets in Nigeria, the UK, USA, Switzerland, the UAE and Canada and such other successes.
It has been observed that corruption might kill Nigeria if nothing is done to kill it and even though President Muhammadu Buhari made it a cardinal objective to fight corruption to a standstill, there is a preponderance of evidence that the effort of his administration has not yielded heart-warming results. Only in January this year, Transparency International published a report indicating that Nigeria recorded a decline in her Corruption Perception Index for the year 2020. Out of 180 countries, Nigeria came a dismal 149, grossing merely 25 points out of 100.
From government Ministries, Departments, Agencies and Parastals to the private sector, it is widely believed that corruption still pervades the system in the country while there is very little being done to reverse the trend. It is also a commonly held view that the government of the day is either shielding corrupt officials from prosecution or simply lacks the will to walk its talk of fishing out and bringing corrupt personnel to book.
Finally, The Tide thinks that, to make the desired impact of reducing corruption in Nigeria, Bawa’s EFCC must initiate and promote measures to prevent corruption in addition to detecting and sanctioning corrupt officials and their activities.
There is no doubt that the fight against corruption in Nigeria is a herculean one but with the requisite political will, courage, determination and channelling of needed resources, the Leviathan can be contained and Nigerians given a fresh lease of life. Bawa stands at the threshold of history of giving his compatriots an anti-graft agency they can be proud of.
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
