Opinion
Toward New School Curricula
Education has long been
identified as the bedrock of individual and societal development. Be it formal education in the primary, secondary and tertiary institutions or informal education, which involves one being a journeyman to a qualified tradesman for a number of years, like in the making of a roadside auto mechanic, welder or auto electrician, to mention just these, the goal is the same.
It is through any of these forms of education that one could improve himself and then his family and society. Without one form of education or the other, survival in a modern society, particularly in the urban centres becomes an uphill task.
If one is not usefully engaged either as a self-employed person, or an employee of one organization or the other, he or she cannot raise the resources to pay his or her rent, pay the steadily rising electricity bills, and other utilities as well as feed himself and family. This accounts for the more than passing interest government at all levels pay to the education sector.
The objective of educating the youth in a manner that makes majority of them to be self-employed, and even employers of labour has become more imperative now than ever before in view of the acute unemployment situation in the country.
For example, the rising crime rate has been attributed to frustration on the part of the unemployed, and in some cases, unemployable graduates of our tertiary institutions, whose ranks continue to swell at the end of each academic session.
This position, therefore, makes it necessary for government to rethink its education curricula in order to evolve a strategy that would yield graduates or youths that, in the main, could be self-sustaining.
It is in this connection that plans by the Rivers State Government led by Rt. Hon Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, to unveil a new domesticated curricula for schools by September 2011 becomes relevant.
Happily, since the plan is envisaged to lay a solid educational foundation for youths at the formative and most difficult years of their lives during the primary and secondary school years, it is pertinent to suggest that the curricula be technical education-oriented.
That the Rivers State Government is very interested in the education and development of youths is not in doubt as underlined by the huge and extensive infrastructural facilities now being put on ground at the primary and secondary school levels.
In fact, the government’s vision, which is anchored on the more than 350 state-of-the-art model primary schools and 23 world-class model secondary schools, being built across the 23 local government areas of the state, is premised on this policy framework. Although some of these schools, especially the model primary schools, have been equipped and tastily furnished, what is left now is the provision of equipment for the remaining schools, with adequate staffing to drive the dream of government, to build a human capacity base that meets the increasing demands of the ever dynamic and competitive 21st century world.
But, we have seen that over time, the existing grammar schools dotted across the length and breathe of the state, have failed to produce skilled manpower that would be helpful in the technological advancement of the country, hence the need for emphasis to be placed on technical education for youths.
Indeed, the Osun State Governor, Gbemi Rauf Aregbesola, made the point crystal clear recently when he advocated a national policy on job creation and poverty alleviation through the use of vocational technical education to tackle rising unemployment, and the consequent high criminality profile in the land.
In his message last week to the 17th National Conference for Schools of Business Studies at Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Aregbesola noted that the policy, when in place, would ensure that education would offer less of books but more of bolts and nuts training, adding that upon completion, and with some help from government, products of vocational technical education would be equipped to practice their trades.
Aregbesola, in his address for the conference with the theme, “vocational technical education and national development”, also said that rising unemployment among the nation’s teeming graduates calls for the adoption of this type of education to address the problems.
From the foregoing, one could assert that adequate funding and rehabilitation of our existing technical schools, plus the raising of new ones in each of the 23 local government areas of Rivers State, would be money well channeled in the interest of the youths in particular and society at large.
At at now, the existing technical schools include the Government Technical School in Tombia, Government Vocational Training Centre (GVTC), Port Harcourt, Government Technical Secondary School, Oginigba, among others. In fact, at the higher level of education, the Rivers State University of Science and Technology (RSUST), Nkpolu, and the Rivers State Polytechnic, Bori, where the students who show exceptional ability or who excel in academics could go for their degree programmes in technical courses.
That vocational technical education is the way out of this massive youth unemployment is not in doubt, especially for youths in Rivers State, where there is ample opportunity for technically-trained persons to assist themselves, their families, communities and state, through the provision of much-needed services to the ever-increasing range of oil and gas industry players in this hub of hydrocarbons business in Africa.
The state government is, therefore, encouraged to explore this option in view of its potential advantages in engaging the youths in meaningful endeavours, and thus, arresting the bourgeoning spectre of militancy and other social vices now ravaging the society.
Moreover, it is high time the youth realized that the future of the country is in their hands, and this places on them enormous responsibility to ruminate on their future, which is fast approaching an epic stage.
Methinks that the Rivers State Government is equal to the task, but it is necessary to insist that all stakeholders, including parents, religious institutions and faith-based organisations, community leaders and mentors should impress on the youths the need to embrace vocational technical education for a better tomorrow. This is even more important now than ever before because of the growing trend toward world’s reliance on innovation, creativity and ingenuity to advance human and social development of society.
The events that unfolded in Abuja on Tuesday November 11, 2025 between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom Wike and a detachment of soldiers guarding a disputed property, led by Adams Yerima, a commissioned Naval Officer, may go down as one of the defining images of Nigeria’s democratic contradictions. It was not merely a quarrel over land. It was a confrontation between civil authority and the military legacy that still hovers over our national life.
Nyesom Wike, fiery and fearless as always, was seen on video exchanging words with a uniformed officer who refused to grant him passage to inspect a parcel of land alleged to have been illegally acquired. The minister’s voice rose, his temper flared, and the soldier, too, stood his ground, insisting on his own authority. Around them, aides, security men, and bystanders watched, stunned, as two embodiments of the Nigerian state clashed in the open.
The images spread fast, igniting debates across drawing rooms, beer parlours, and social media platforms. Some hailed Wike for standing up to military arrogance; others scolded him for perceived disrespect to the armed forces. Yet beneath the noise lies a deeper question about what sort of society we are building and whether power in Nigeria truly understands the limits of its own reach.
It is tragic that, more than two decades into civil rule, the relationship between the civilian arm of government and the military remains fragile and poorly understood. The presence of soldiers in a land dispute between private individuals and the city administration is, by all civic standards, an aberration. It recalls a dark era when might was right, and uniforms conferred immunity against accountability.
Wike’s anger, even if fiery, was rooted in a legitimate concern: that no individual, however connected or retired, should deploy the military to protect personal interests. That sentiment echoes the fundamental democratic creed that the law is supreme, not personalities. If his passion overshot decorum, it was perhaps a reflection of a nation weary of impunity.
On the other hand, the soldier in question is a symbol of another truth: that discipline, respect for order, and duty to hierarchy are ingrained in our armed forces. He may have been caught between conflicting instructions one from his superiors, another from a civilian minister exercising his lawful authority. The confusion points not to personal failure but to institutional dysfunction.
It is, therefore, simplistic to turn the incident into a morality play of good versus evil.
*********”**** What happened was an institutional embarrassment. Both men represented facets of the same failing system a polity still learning how to reconcile authority with civility, law with loyalty, and service with restraint.
In fairness, Wike has shown himself as a man of uncommon courage. Whether in Rivers State or at the FCTA, he does not shy away from confrontation. Yet courage without composure often feeds misunderstanding. A public officer must always be the cooler head, even when provoked, because the power of example outweighs the satisfaction of winning an argument.
Conversely, soldiers, too, must be reminded that their uniforms do not place them above civilian oversight. The military exists to defend the nation, not to enforce property claims or intimidate lawful authorities. Their participation in purely civil matters corrodes the image of the institution and erodes public trust.
One cannot overlook the irony: in a country where kidnappers roam highways and bandits sack villages, armed men are posted to guard contested land in the capital. It reflects misplaced priorities and distorted values. The Nigerian soldier, trained to defend sovereignty, should not be drawn into private or bureaucratic tussles.
Sycophancy remains the greatest ailment of our political culture. Many of those who now cheer one side or the other do so not out of conviction but out of convenience. Tomorrow they will switch allegiance. True patriotism lies not in defending personalities but in defending principles. A people enslaved by flattery cannot nurture a culture of justice.
The Nigerian elite must learn to submit to the same laws that govern the poor. When big men fence off public land and use connections to shield their interests, they mock the very constitution they swore to uphold. The FCT, as the mirror of national order, must not become a jungle where only the powerful can build.
The lesson for Wike himself is also clear: power is best exercised with calmness. The weight of his office demands more than bravery; it demands statesmanship. To lead is not merely to command, but to persuade — even those who resist your authority.
Equally, the lesson for the armed forces is that professionalism shines brightest in restraint. Obedience to illegal orders is not loyalty; it is complicity. The soldier who stands on the side of justice protects both his honour and the dignity of his uniform.
The Presidency, too, must see this episode as a wake-up call to clarify institutional boundaries. If soldiers can be drawn into civil enforcement without authorization, then our democracy remains at risk of subtle militarization. The constitution must speak louder than confusion.
The Nigerian public deserves better than spectacles of ego. We crave leaders who rise above emotion and officers who respect civilian supremacy. Our children must not inherit a nation where authority means shouting matches and intimidation in public glare.
Every democracy matures through such tests. What matters is whether we learn the right lessons. The British once had generals who defied parliament; the Americans once fought over states’ rights; Nigeria, too, must pass through her own growing pains but with humility, not hubris.
If the confrontation has stirred discomfort, then perhaps it has done the nation some good. It forces a conversation long overdue: Who truly owns the state — the citizen or the powerful? Can we build a Nigeria where institutions, not individuals, define our destiny?
As the dust settles, both the FCTA and the military hierarchy must conduct impartial investigations. The truth must be established — not to shame anyone, but to restore order. Where laws were broken, consequences must follow. Where misunderstandings occurred, apologies must be offered.
Let the rule of law triumph over the rule of impulse. Let civility triumph over confrontation. Let governance return to the path of dialogue and procedure.
Nigeria cannot continue to oscillate between civilian bravado and military arrogance. Both impulses spring from the same insecurity — the fear of losing control. True leadership lies in the ability to trust institutions to do their work without coercion.
Those who witnessed the clash saw a drama of two gladiators. One in starched khaki, one in well-cut suit. Both proud, both unyielding. But a nation cannot be built on stubbornness; it must be built on understanding. Power, when it meets power, should produce order, not chaos.
We must resist the temptation to glorify temper. Governance is not warfare; it is stewardship. The citizen watches, the world observes, and history records. How we handle moments like this will define our collective maturity.
The confrontation may have ended without violence, but it left deep questions in the national conscience. When men of authority quarrel in the open, institutions tremble. The people, once again, become spectators in a theatre of misplaced pride.
It is time for all who hold office — civilian or military — to remember that they serve under the same flag. That flag is neither khaki nor political colour; it is green-white-green, and it demands humility.
No victor, no vanquish only a lesson for a nation still learning to govern itself with dignity.
By; King Onunwor
