Editorial
Atiku And The Power Sector Reforms
The call by the former Vice President of Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar for the reversal of the privatisation of the power sector, raises a lot of suspicion. This is moreso when the management of the sector by government in the country over the years did not yield the desired result.
This is against the backdrop of the immense demand for power as a cardinal imperative for socio-economic development of the country. Even so, examples from other countries have shown that the key to a functional power sector is in the hands of the private sector.
That perhaps informed the decision of the President Olusegun Obasanjo government to spend trillions of Naira to privatise the power sector before now. The failure of the Electricity Power Sector Reform Act of 2005 challenged ex-President Goodluck Jonathan to launch the Roadmap on Power in 2010.
In line with the roadmap, the government of Goodluck Jonathan completed the handover of the country’s electricity generating companies (Gencos) and electricity distribution companies (Discos) to new private sector operators on November 1, 2013.
This singular act was widely acclaimed as one of the most transparent privatization exercises in Africa. In fact, the world sees the privatisation of the power sector by ex-President Jonathan’s government as one of the greatest achievements of the administration and the best impetus for growth in Nigeria. This is because the power reform is seen as a catalyst to the country’s economic transformation.
The power sector reform, we believe will improve electricity supply to homes and businesses, create more jobs, promote higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and lead to increased household incomes. It will also improve standard of living, youth employment and social security.
Indeed, to dislodge the cabals massed against a sustainable public power supply and meet the needs of former PHCN workers among other challenges to privatise the sector was by no means easy. But to reverse it will be of greater cost and waste for Nigeria.
Two years into the privatisation and coming on stream of the Gencos and Discos, there is no doubt that electricity generation has increased significantly from 2800mw in 2011 to about 4517mw, resulting in more hours of power availability per day in major cities across the country.
Similarly, electricity transmission lines in the country is also known to have increased from 4.550km in 2010 to 15,760km in 2015, while transmission substations have also increased from 121 to 162 in spite of some teething problems and the deliberate sabotage of electricity installations.
The distribution capacity of the power sector is said to have almost tripled from 3,658mw in 2010 to 9,200mw in 2014 due to the inauguration of the National Integrated Power Project (NIPP) distribution projects. Over 4,000 rural communities have since 2010 been connected to the National Grid.
But the sector has not yet achieved its full potentials because of the activities of saboteurs, especially power and gas pipeline vandals who are said to attack pipelines networks across the country at an average of once every four days.
In addition to the sponsorship of dealers of electricity generators, the alleged involvement of political opponents has become a challenge.
Having failed to deter the government through the various acts of sabotage, the use of some national figures to stop the privatisation cannot be ruled out.
It is therefore sad that persons who have seen the benefits of privatisation in the telecoms industry and the broadcast industry among others would ask the President Muhammadu Buhari government to reverse the process. It is callous, unpatriotic and unprogressive.
If this retrogressive proposal is considered, Nigeria would have lost the time and resources deployed in settling workers of PHCN, providing the base for private sector participation among others. The move will also mean the victory of a few cabals who rip-off Nigerians in that sector and a sure return to the era of darkness.
We therefore urge the new government to do what will give the greatest number of Nigerians joy, and that is steady electricity. The government must remove all obstacles in the way of the power companies including sabotage to enable the sector grow in private hands.
Nigeria must make progress and not suffer the age-long motion of “one step forward, two steps backwards”.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics4 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics4 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics4 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics4 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics4 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
