Oil & Energy

Lawmakers Task Coys, Nigerians On Solutions To Adulterated Fuel

Published

2 years ago

August 5, 2024

Following the influx of adulterated fuel products into Nigeria, the House of Representatives’ Joint Committee on Petroleum Resources (Midstream and Downstream) has called on oil companies and stakeholders in the nation’s oil and gas sector to among other things submit proposals highlighting how to address and combat the menace.
The proposals are needed ahead of the lawmakers’ public hearing, following the committee’s forensic investigation into the challenges affecting the midstream and downstream petroleum sectors in Nigeria.
The call was made in a Press Release signed by the Spokesman of the committee, Rep. Akin Rotimi, and published on the Committee’s Facebook page on Thursday, August 1.
According to the release, Chairman of the Joint Committee of the House, Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere, disclosed that the joint committee was investigating allegations of production and importation of substandard fuel products and non-supply of crude to domestic refineries.
He said the initiative was empowered by Sections 88 and 89 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), which authorizes the National Assembly to conduct investigations.
Ugochinyere also stated that the investigation followed a resolution of the House on July 9, 2024, mandating the inquiry to address issues within these critical sectors.
“In view of this, the Joint Committee (Midstream and Downstream) invites stakeholders, petroleum industry experts, private oil companies, and the general public to submit memoranda to assist in this comprehensive investigation”, the statement partly reads.
It continued that “Issues each proposal should address include: Resurgence of fuel queues at petrol stations; unavailability of fuel stock for downstream domestic refineries; disruption of the distribution of PMS products; unfair subsidization of PMS and other petroleum products, racketeering, and favoritism in the Pro Forma Invoice (PFI) system; Indiscriminate issuance of licenses and importation of refined petroleum products.
“Alleged return of PMS price intervention; Allegation of product unavailability to marketers from NNPC Retail, endless shifting of timelines for refinery rehabilitation, and nefarious activities at petrol depots; unavailability of laboratories to check adulterated products; influx of adulterated products into the country; allegation of non-domestication of profits realized from crude marketing sales in local banks, and abuse of the PFI regime.
“Importation of products already being produced in Nigeria; use of international trading companies to resell fuel stock to local refineries.
“Also is the allegation of the return of subsidy on downstream PMS products; Unclarity about the exact landing cost of PMS reduction in retail price and its impact on downstream operations; Allegation of importation of substandard products and high-sulphur diesel into Nigeria; sale of petroleum products below fair market value impacting downstream and local refineries, and sources of funds for price interventions; Lack of support for local crude refiners”.

It also included “high cost of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and lack of clarity on PMS landing costs; Allegations of unfair subsidization, racketeering, favoritism in the Pro Forma Invoice (PFI) system, and abuse of the PFI regime.

“Presence of middlemen in trading; Importation of locally produced products like jet fuel and AGO; alleged return of PMS subsidy and issues surrounding the subsidy regime; Importation of substandard/high-sulphur diesel; failure of regulators like the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) to enforce compliance and standards; forward sales, revenue from it, and its impact on domestic crude availability; sustainability of the ongoing endless turnaround maintenance of refineries.

“Alleged non-completion of the merger of OVH and NNPCL retail, and other challenges in the merger; Allegation of introduction of monopoly in petroleum products production; Sharp practices at depots and non-availability of petroleum products after payment; main causes of fuel availability crises, high costs, and alleged racketeering by marketers; demand for a ban on the importation of PMS and other petroleum products”.

The lawmakers stressed that the memoranda should highlight concerns, challenges, and proposed solutions to the issues.

“Submissions must be delivered in 10 hard copies, accompanied by two flash drives, to the office of the Clerk, Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream), Room HB. 44, White House, National Assembly, Abuja, by Wednesday, August 14, 2024.

By: Lady Godknows Ogbulu

Oil & Energy

NERC, OYSERC Partner To Strengthen Regulation

Published

4 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

THE Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has stressed the need for strict adherence to due process in operationalizing state electricity regulatory bodies.

It, however, pledged institutional and technical support to the Oyo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (OYSERC).

The Chairman, NERC, Dr Musiliu Oseni, who made the position known while receiving the OYSERC delegation, emphasised that the establishment and take-off of state commissions must align fully with the law setting them up.

Oseni said that the NERC remains committed to partnering with State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERC) to guarantee their institutional stability, operational effectiveness and long-term success.

He insisted that regulatory coordination between federal and state institutions is critical in the evolving electricity market framework, noting that collaboration would help to build strong institutions capable of delivering sustainable outcomes for the sector.

Also speaking, the Acting Chairman, OYSERC and leader of the delegation, Prof. Dahud Kehinde Shangodoyin, said that the visit was aimed at formally introducing the commission’s acting leadership to the NERC and laying the groundwork for a productive working relationship.

Shangodoyin said , the acting members were appointed to provide direction and lay a solid foundation for the commission during its transitional period, pending the appointment of substantive members.

“We are here to formally introduce the acting leadership of OYSERC and to establish a working relationship with NERC as we commence our regulatory responsibilities,” he said.

He acknowledged NERC’s readiness to provide technical and regulatory support, particularly in the area of capacity development, describing the backing as essential for strengthening the commission’s operations at this formative stage.

“We appreciate NERC’s willingness to support us technically and regulatorily, especially in building our capacity during this transition,” he added.

Oil & Energy

NLC Faults FG’s 3trn Dept Payment To GenCos

Published

4 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Association of Power Generation Companies have engaged in a showdown over federal government legacy debt.

NLC president Joe Ajaero has faulted the federal government’s move to give GenCos N3 trillion from the Federation account as repayment for a power sector legacy debt, which amounts to N6.5 trillion.

In a statement on Thursday, Ajaero said the Federal Government proposed the N3 trillion payment and the N6 trillion debt as a heist and grand deception to shortchange the Nigerian people.

“Nigerians cannot and should not continue to pay for darkness,” Ajaero stated.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, APGC, Dr. Joy Ogaji, said Ajaero may be ignorant of the true state of things, insisting that the federal government is indebted to GenCos to the tune of N6.5 trillion.

She feared the longstanding conflict could result in the eventual collapse of the country’s power.

According to her, the federal government’s N501 billion issuance of power sector bonds is inadequate to address its accumulated debt.

Oil & Energy

PENGASSAN Rejects Presidential EO On Oil, Gas Revenue Remittance ……… Seeks PIA Review

Published

4 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

The Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria(PENGASSAN) Festus Osifo, has faulted the public explanation surrounding the Federal Government’s recent oil revenue Executive Order(EO).

President of the association, Festus Osifo, argued that claims about a 30 per cent deduction from petroleum sharing contract revenue are misleading.

Recall that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, last Wednesday, February 18, signed the executive order directing that royalty oil, tax oil, profit oil, profit gas, and other revenues due to the Federation under production sharing, profit sharing, and risk service contracts be paid directly into the Federation Account.

The order also scrapped the 30 per cent Frontier Exploration Fund under the PIA and stopped the 30 per cent management fee on profit oil and profit gas retained by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

In his reaction, Osifo, while addressing journalists, in Lagos, Thursday, said the figure being referenced does not represent gross revenue accruing to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

He explained that revenues from production sharing contracts are subject to several deductions before arriving at what is classified as profit oil or profit gas.

Osifo also urged President Bola Tinubu to withdraw his recently signed Presidential Executive Order to Safeguard Federation Oil and Gas Revenues and Provide Regulatory Clarity, 2026.

He warned that the directive undermines the Petroleum Industry Act and could create uncertainty in the oil and gas industry, insisting that any amendment to the existing legal framework must pass through the National Assembly.

Osifo argued that an executive order cannot override a law enacted by the National Assembly, describing the move as setting a troubling precedent.

“Yes, that is what should be done from the beginning. You can review the laws of a land. There is no law that is perfect,” he said.

He added that the President should constitute a team to review the PIA, identify its strengths and weaknesses, and forward proposed amendments to lawmakers.

“When you get revenue from PSC, you have to make some deductibles. You deduct royalties. You deduct tax. You also deduct the cost of cost recovery. Once you have done that, you will now have what we call profit oil or profit gas. Then that is where you now deduct the 30 per cent,” he stated..

According to him, when the deductions are properly accounted for, the 30 per cent being referenced translates to about two per cent of total revenue from the production sharing contracts.

“In effect, that deduction is about two per cent of the revenue of the PLCs,” he added, maintaining that the explanation presented in the public domain did not accurately reflect the structure of the deductions.

Osifo warned that removing the affected portion of the revenue could have operational implications for NNPC Ltd, noting that the funds are used to meet salary obligations and other internal expenses.

“That two per cent is what NNPC uses to pay salaries and meet some of its obligations.The one you are also removing from the midstream and downstream, it is part of what they use in meeting their internal obligations. So as you are removing this, how are they going to pay salaries?” he queried.

Beyond the immediate impact on the company’s workforce, he cautioned that regulatory uncertainty could affect investor confidence in the sector.

“If the international community and investors lose confidence in Nigeria, it has a way of affecting investment. That should be the direction. You don’t put a cow before the horse,” he added.

According to him, stakeholders, including labour unions and industry operators, should be given the opportunity to make inputs at the National Assembly as part of the amendment process saying “That is how laws are refined,”