Editorial

Edugate: Intensifying Anti-Graft War

Published

2 years ago

January 17, 2024

The prompt order issued by President Bola Tinubu to Nigeria’s anti-graft agencies for a comprehensive investigation into the financial operations of the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation is not only commendable but a much-needed step towards tackling the systemic corruption prevailing in the nation. The resultant suspension of its minister, Dr Betta Edu, further signifies the gravity of the issue and the commitment towards rectifying it.
However, the scandal has evoked an underlying decadence that seeped deeply into the country’s socio-political fabric, demanding far more than sporadic actions to deal with isolated incidents. The President should seize the opportunity presented by the uproar arising from the opprobrium to instigate a full-scale anti-corruption crusade. He should conduct a thorough scrutiny of every government department and their financial affairs.
Edu reportedly directed the Accountant-General of the Federation, Oluwatoyin Madein, to execute a transfer of N585million to a private account. This account allegedly belongs to Bridget Oniyelu Mojisola, purportedly identified as the Project Accountant for Grants for Vulnerable Groups by the ministry. The matter took a new turn when Madein said she declined Edu’s request, citing the regulation that public money cannot be paid into private accounts.
The suspended minister was implicated in yet another leaked memorandum for allegedly authorising N72million to her aides as part of the 2023 grant for the vulnerable group programme in Kogi State. This funding was intended for expenses such as flight tickets, airport taxis, local running costs, and Duty Tour Allowance, even though the state does not have an airport. Moreover, several companies were reportedly paid about N3billion as consultancy fees for the verification of the National Social Register (NSR). More worrisome is a leaked memo indicating that the Chief of Staff to the President actually approved the expenditure of N3billion from the COVID-19 Palliative Fund for the payment of consultants hired by Edu to verify the NSR.
This raises numerous ethical questions: Why invest so much money in consultants when the nation struggles with fiscal deficits? Why hire consultants while local talents remain underutilised and jobless? And more importantly, is there a tangible return on investment that can be traced to these expensive consultancy services? The absence of satisfactory answers to these questions indicates a blatant erosion of governance’s ethical elements — fairness, justice, empowerment, and most essentially, accountability.
The reverberations caused by Edu’s conduct and her subsequent suspension by Tinubu, bring to the fore the ongoing tumult in the nation’s political architecture. This uproar presents a stark reminder of the corruption and lack of accountability that has pervaded the political space. Tinubu, compelled, perhaps by the commotion resonating across the country, suspended Edu. Following this, penultimate Tuesday, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) interrogated her in Abuja. These events are emblematic of a renewed call for transparency in governance.
The President’s swift response may underscore his commitment towards promoting accountability in governance. But it also presents an opportunity for a cogent critique of the seemingly hasty action taken. Was this move just to assuage the outraged citizenry, or is it a signpost towards a sustained campaign against corruption and bad governance? While Tinubu’s action resonates with Nigerians and civil society organisations, it also raises questions about the transparency and accountability measures within his administration. That his Chief of Staff gave the nod for such expenditure leaves too many unanswered questions.
Even so, the EFCC’s subsequent interrogation of Edu in Abuja marks another noteworthy turn of events. This approach suggests a maturing investigative process geared towards achieving justice and equity. Simultaneously, it also indicates a potential shift in the fight against corruption within Nigeria. Again, we could argue that while such practices may lend credibility to the government’s commitment to transparency, they also expose underlying political intentions.
It is alleged that New Planet Project Limited, a company owned and operated by the Minister for Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, has been linked to Edu’s malfeasance. Ojo was awarded a contract worth N438.1million to serve as a consultant for the reputedly fraudulent National Social Register project, which aimed to verify 11 million homes in Nigeria within a month. The anti-graft agency must investigate him to ascertain the level of his involvement. Like Edu, Ojo should be suspended to facilitate a thorough inquiry.
Scrutinising the Tunji-Ojo scandal earnestly might lead us to various contemplations. We might start by questioning the ‘conflict of interest’, as the line between Ojo’s private and public interests seems blurred. As Interior Minister and proprietor of New Planet Project Limited simultaneously, it spills the question of whether national interest is sacrificed for personal gain. The contract might as well have been a smokescreen to siphon public funds, hence harnessing the wheels of corruption.
The Humanitarian Ministry has arguably been bedevilled with corruption allegations. The immediate past minister, Sadiya Umar-Farouq, is being probed by the EFCC, over an alleged N37billion fraud. The funds, intended for the betterment of Nigerians, were laundered through a contractor’s 38 different bank accounts. In 2020, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) said it uncovered N2.67billion meant for the ministry’s school feeding programme in private bank accounts.
Unfortunately for Nigeria, a bulk of the poverty alleviation funds are loans. The country had borrowed $800million from the World Bank to cushion the removal of petrol subsidies through cash transfers to 50 million vulnerable citizens. The leveraging of loans for poverty mitigation programmes puts the nation in a precarious financial position, primarily if these funds are not appropriately utilised or fail to yield the expected socio-economic outcomes. As William Feather once noted, “borrowed money is the most potent form of mythology”, and Nigeria’s increasing reliance on loans to fund poverty alleviation schemes epitomises this concern.
The Edu case presents an arduous challenge; however, it is a challenge that offers a momentous occasion for reform. The choices made by the President will either bring about a promising dawn or cast an ominous shadow over the nation’s retrospective reputation. Tinubu must remember that his decisions will not only affect him but also the future of an entire country. If he takes a firm and rightful stand on these corruption matters, he can reassure Nigerians and the international community that the fight against corruption has truly begun.
And honestly, Mr President must not leave anyone found culpable in his government, no matter how highly placed.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

6 days ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 weeks ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.