Connect with us

Opinion

Behind Current Global Insecurity

Published

on

Taking the current situation in Afghanistan as a peg, any intelligent analyst of global events would be able to draw some far-reaching conclusions that would be quite rational. A conclusion can be deemed rational if it is based on historical antecedents without myopic or prejudicial analysis and judgment. Earliest conflicts in human history can be traced to territorial or land-related encroachment, usually by wandering or nomadic groups looking for pastures.
Behind encroachment on lands is the issue of hustling for natural resources, whereby groups with weapons of coercion usually become the aggressors. Despite cultural and language differences, aggression has its own culture and language which can be understood without an interpreter or mediator. Behind the aggressive and acquisitive temperament lies human vanity which gives impetus to the exploration of weapons of coercion and conquest. Occupational lifestyle can also give impetus to the acquisition of weapon of coercion to cow others.
Occupational lifestyle which demands wandering from one place to another usually requires possessing means of coping with the unexpected. Means of coping with unexpected encounters include weapons of coercion and the use of wit and cunning. Ancient Buddhist travelling monks developed judo and karate as weapons of self-defence. For other wandering or nomadic groups like the Moors of old, concealed daggers and poisoned arrows and bows became common personal accoutrements. Mass production of destructive weapons for warfare and conquest purposes came much later in history.
Historically, ancient Assyrians were the most dreaded and hated of all nations of antiquity, because of the unspeakable cruelties and agonies which their soldiers were noted for. Assyrian soldiers were not satisfied with conquering territories but took delight in skinning prisoners of war alive and cutting off their sex organs, just for the sadistic joy and pleasure. Ruthless military culture began with aggressive territorial conquests and proselytisation, then later as means of commerce and colonialism.
Spain in particular, among other European nations, was notorious for the sufferings and agonies brought upon the Jews and the Moors. The Black race suffered the worst forms of dehumanisation in the hands of supposedly superior White races. A study of atrocities committed by aggressive groups against other groups that they could prey upon, would be quite shocking. Questions to ask would include what accounts for man’s destructive aggressiveness, and if those who cause pains and agonies to others, do get away with their activities. It would not be enough to talk about Nemesis and Kama rather, it is imperative to understand their modus operandi.
The perplexing issues and challenges of life cannot be explained or appreciated without taking into account the operational mechanism of Nemesis or Karma, as well as the controversy about repeated life on Earth. We rarely have adequate idea about what magnanimity and grace contained in the opportunity provided for human salvation, individually and collectively. Neither do we know clearly the mechanism of the idiom that those who go by the sword, perish by it; for those who cause pains must bear pains to resolve imbalances.
Away from ancient times and atrocities committed by humans, perhaps out of vanity and ignorance, the present era has a duty to understand what lies behind current global insecurities and other challenges hard to deal with. The pillars or foundation provided by human vanity and ignorance must be dismantled, if we must have a better understanding of what lies behind current experiences. It would also require a good deal of humility rather than belligerence, to be able to work out a road map for a sustainable change for the better. Personal responsibility is a valid doctrine.
Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) can serve as a peg for exploring the trends of current global experiences. As leader of the National Socialist Party in Germany, he became a dictator from 1934, and from membership of 7 persons in 1920, Hitler’s party became a titan. Elected into power in 1932, he destroyed all other political parties and changed the direction of his country in accordance with the Nazi creed. Having annexed Austria in 1938, he occupied Czechoslovakia in 1939 and then sought to invade Poland which resulted in World War II. Hitler committed suicide when faced by defeat. Nazi creed saw the Germans as “Called People” (Master race).
Despite controversies about how Hitler’s life ended and his worldview, current global experiences have been shaped by his role in modern history. Despite all controversies about how he died and what notes that he left behind, he was alleged to have predicted that the two leading religions of mankind (Christianity and Islam) would play leading roles in global instability and insecurity. He was also alleged to have predicted beginning of global and devastating judgement. Such records were destroyed, and part of his personal memoir Mein Kamf.
Among sketchy records that could be put together by researchers, there were allusions to three issues of global significance. The first was that the light arising from the Jewish nation was taken over by power merchants and abused. The second allusion pointed fingers at the “Support Light from Arabia” being used for holding the human mind hostage through dogmatism. Then a third allusion pointed towards the “German race as providing the light for the new era”. More significant in Hitler’s lamentations was an allusion to himself as “a Moses who would not reach the promised land”.
Whatever speculations that may arise from the enigmatic life and allusions of Adolf Hiller of Nazi German and the dream of a new world, a vital summary is that World Wars I and II marked a turning point in global history. Whether or not the New Global Light took off in Germany, the evidence is that “The Light Shineth in Darkness; and the Darkness Comprehended It Not”. Similarly, the fact that the light arising from the Jewish nation and the one from Arabia, have become instruments of division, gives a testimony that the Darkness holds humanity hostage.
It is a pity that religion should become a means of global insecurity rather than unity. The situation in Afghanistan is a clear evidence that religious dogmatism and intolerance fuel global insecurity. Rather than broaden the minds and world view of humans, politics and commerce have used religion as instruments of narrow-mindedness and vanity, creating divisions among humans.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending