Business
Experts Want Strict Enforcement Of Tax Laws
Some tax experts have called for stricter punishment for tax defaulters, to make funds available for the provision of critical infrastructure and growth of the economy.
The experts, in separate interviews with The Tide source in Lagos, Monday also called for a probe of the tax records of politicians.
The experts spoke against the background of the recent revelation by the Federal Inland Revenue (FIRS) that close to 7,000 billionaires had defaulted in payment of tax.
Consequently, the FIRS said it would go after the defaulting taxpayers who were raking in billions in Nigeria and not paying taxes.
“This category of Nigerians has deprived the country of huge sums of money needed to build roads, hospitals, schools and others.
“Most developed and developing economies rely on tax for infrastructural development. There is need for stricter punishment on tax evaders in the country.
“Tax evaders are sent to jail in other climes,” Prof. Sheriffdeen Tella, a Senior Economist at the Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago, Iwoye, said.
The economist insisted that the FIRS should probe the tax records of politicians who were spending millions of naira to collect forms for their party primaries.
The Director, Legal Services, Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS), Mr Seyi Alade, also attributed incessant tax evasion in Nigeria to non prioritisation of taxation by the Federal Government.
Alade said the federal government did not prioritise the issue of tax which could be used to develop infrastructure.
Alade explained that the revelation that more than 6,772 billionaires evaded tax meant that there was less revenue available to the government to fund critical infrastructure.
According him, such huge tax evasion was partly responsible for the level of the country’s rising external debt, because government is borrowing more to take care of the infrastructure gap.
“Taxation is a tool for economic management and development and should support sustainable growth and infrastructural development at all times.
“Payment of taxes is a civic responsibility of all legible tax payers and evasion of taxes is tantamount to depriving the economy of its sustainable means of economic development.
“Tax evasion is the bane of the tax system and it is also a criminal offence and should be strongly decried.
“Of course it will lead to tangible economic loss more so as revenue from oil is no longer stable,” Alade said.
The Assistant Director, Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), Mrs Oso Afolake, advised the federal government to streamline the taxation system for more revenue generation.
Afolake blamed the rampant tax evasion in the country to weak taxation system, which she said was fixable by the government.
She called for more stringent application of the nation’s tax statute by tax authorities against tax defaulters and also against entities that have statutory duties to remit taxes.
According to her, for multinationals like MTN and many others operating in Nigeria to evade tax, means lots of economic loss on the country.
She said it would impact on the economy negatively; making the tax to GDP ratio to remain low.
“Tax evasion results to reduction in revenue obtainable from taxes and this will deprive government the required resources to perform its statutory duties.
“Our government usually doesn’t give priority to the issue of tax, may be because of the resources at their disposal.
“It behooves on the government to restructure the tax system such that every legible taxpayer will be compelled to pay tax as at when due,” Afolake said.
The president, International Centre for Tax Research and Development, Mrs Morenike Babington-Ashaye, urged government to lay emphasis on building Nigerians’ attitude towards voluntary compliance to tax law through processes and procedures.
Babington-Ashaye argued that using the banks to go after defaulting taxpayers was not a legitimate process.
“Actually, I don’t believe the FIRS should be going beyond the law. The process by the FIRS is turning to be a military system.
“The only way they can do that is if they go through the judiciary process by taking the defaulting taxpayers to court. Then, the court makes a judgement that they pay penalty and interest,” she said.
Babington-Ashaye, also a founding member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), described the FIRS’s process of asking the banks to seize money as ‘going through the back door’.
This, the president said might lead to customers not saving their money in the banks, thereby reducing their resources for operation.
“It will also encourage some individuals and companies to be transacting businesses in another companies’ names. So, the process is not legitimate.
“In the first instance the banks are not direct agents and do not have any judiciary position between the FIRS and the taxpayers,” she said.
A Tax Leader, PwC West Africa, Mr Taiwo Oyedele, described the process as unconventional, and that executing such order should be in accordance with the law to avoid negative impact on businesses and ease of paying taxes.
Oyedele advised that tax payers to pay attention to their tax affairs and discharge their tax obligations as and when due.
Banking/ Finance
Ripple Survey Reveals Appetite for Digital Assets
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.
