Connect with us

Politics

Political Ambition Should Not Be At People’s Expense – Mrs Tepikor

Published

on

Mrs. Tepikor Anastasia
was the candidate of the National Conscience Party (NCP) in the April, 2015 governorship election in Rivers State. Mrs. Tepikor is also the state chairman of the NCP. Now she serves as a caretaker committee member in Oyigbo Local Government Area.
Opaka Dokubo met with her in Port Harcourt and she spoke about her ambition to be governor, her service at the local government council and other political developments in Rivers State and Nigeria at large.
Excerpts
Why take up both positions as chairman and governorship candidate of the party?
People actually indicated interest to fly the flag of the party in the governorship election but I took it upon myself to consider what they were up to. If I interviewed you and saw you were not up to any business and the you really wanted to contest, you really wanted to win, nothing stopped me from giving you the ticket. I tried as many that came who wanted the ticket of the party and I asked them to find out their vision for Rivers State, what they wanted to do for the state or they just wanted the ticket to go and look for settlement. I discovered many were not serious.
We decided as a party that anyone that must run on our platform must see it as an opportunity to serve and not to be selfish. That was why at the final moment, I decided to take it up. I also believe that what a man can do, a woman can do better.
So, how did the election go for you?
I thank God, first and foremost because if you have not been involved in something, you may not have what to say about it. My involvement was not a mistake neither is it something to regret about.
I tried and  I thank God. It is not everyone that will  win at the same time. That I did not win did not mean the end to life. I think there are other areas that I can be of assistance to society and I should focus on that.
Someone must emerge winner and once that happens, there shouldn’t be problems because no matter how many times you do it, only one person will emerge winner at a time, someone has emerged and we thank God for that.. what I think is needed of everyone else is to rally round and support His Excellency.
I didn’t take it as a do-or-die affair from the beginning but if I had decided that I want to die for it based on certain statements I may have made, indeed I would want to die with the outcome. But it is selfishness that will make someone to say I want to die over an issue that you know that it is people who give the mandate. If you know that it is the people who give the mandate and they did not give to you this time, it does not mean that they would not give to you next time.
What is your own take about the conduct and outcome of that election?
See, I am a Christian, I don’t believe anyone can achieve and sustain anything with his strength. The Bible says “the arm of flesh fails”. So, if your trust is on God, then you will wait on God and if He wants you to be, one day you will be. Whatever God has not given to you, you cannot take it upon yourself.
Coming back to what you have asked, some people say the election process was marred, it was flawed.
The election took place and I voted in my area. In fact, I was the first to vote in my unit. As a candidate, I was given that opportunity and it was peaceful.
One thing is certain, there is no election, whether in Nigeria, Africa or any other part of the world that is free of issues. If that be so, then ours should not be seen as out of place.
I know that gradually we will overcome the challenges that come with elections because I know that the last election was an improvement on previous ones. The difference is clear and it is obvious that we’re maturing. I am looking forward to the future when we will embrace electronic voting system where you vote with your system and it captures you, one man one vote. With that one, no one can rig.
But for now, the system is not so adequate for us not to observe the challenges that we have, they will happen.
Did anybody or party induce you to take that outcome of the election the way you have taken it?
Nobody lured or induced me with anything. Who doesn’t want a good thing anyway? If I had emerged as governor today, infact, my rapport  with you will be a different one, it will not be at this level. I would have  loved  it.
Truth is that if you were not serious from the outset, you would not be expectant. People often asked me “madam, what if you win” and I had always said “that’s what I’m expecting”.  If I don’t have the mind of going to win, why should I come out in the first place?
Nobody settled me and nobody lured me into acceptance of any settlement. I came out believing that it will work out the way I wanted but since it didn’t work out, I shouldn’t be fighting. As I said earlier, in the end, we should be looking forward to how we can make the state work in which ever way we can be of service. And that is way we have said to his excellency “you have tried, you won’. Of course, somebody must win. The tradition in other spheres is that when somebody wins, others go round to congratulate the person and if this happens elsewhere, it should happen in politics too.
In the event of a governorship re run, would still be part of it?
When we get to that bridge we will cross it. I want to be silent about that for now. But let me use the opportunity to clear the air about the appointment I have to serve at the local government as a member of the caretaker committee. That appointment was given to me in my capacity as the chairman of my party in the state. Many state party chairmen were so appointed and I appreciate that.
How do you feel being a member of a local government caretaker committee when you wanted to be Governor?
I will still come back to tell you the God factor. If you don’t have God settled in your heart, you will never be at peace, you’ll never be contented. It is that discontentment that makes people to fight and kill themselves.  It you are a peace loving person, you will not allow people to die because you want to be there. If it is about the people, then it must not be about you. It must not be about you at the detriment of the people you want to serve.
If it is really about service that made you come out in the first place, then you should be ready and willing to serve at whatever level even as a cobbler or whatever. I believe that whatever I am given, I should do it well. God knows how to promote me from there. It is God that makes people.  I am looking forward to a bigger position.
Is your governorship ambition forgotten or is it still alive?
My governorship ambition is very much alive. Just as you asked, how do you reconcile a situation where someone who wants to be a governor takes up a position as a caretaker committee member of a local government, sometimes I also reason like that too. But as I told you, I have peace.
If you look at human reasoning, you will think and get worried over things. But God sees your heart and He knows what you really want and He knows how to take you there. It doesn’t matter how He goes about it. I think I am happy the way I am and happy that I am moving forward. There is nothing that cannot happen. I still have that ambition. I am working and packaging myself.
What would be your recipe for acceptable legislative rerun elections in Rivers State?
I will like to tell everyone to have a mind that is settled. This coming elections will not be a do-or-die affair. If that is settled, people will know that their votes will count. One thing I want to advise is that they should take away the mind of winning at all cost. I insist that the huge presence of the military during election scares people and it doesn’t make the process free because some people will not come out at all to vote.
The presence of the military or the prevalence of force also sometimes brings out what is latent in people. Many times, someone who is criminally minded may not wake up to it until an atmosphere is created for it. The presence of force all over the place may make others to also want to use violence. That is the angle I am looking at it. I pray that coming elections will be free of violence.
I think that if Rivers State is relatively free of the heavy presence of the military, everyone will be encouraged to go out and vote. That does not mean there should not be security made available. But such security that will become a threat is no more security and as such should be reduced. Looking at what happened in Bayelsa and the rest, it is very likely that too much military presence will affect the electoral process negatively.
What is the position of your party on this fight against corruption so far?
This is my opinion as chairman of the party in the state because I will not speak for my national headquarters: Naturally I hate corruption and that’s the reason I joined the NCP in the first place. NCP is known to have a very high integrity especially when we had our founder, the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi.  He was  somebody that had integrity and didn’t like corruption.
It is true that corruption has eaten deep  into the fabric of our nation and if someone has come to say he wants to fight corruption it is not a bad thing. But how do you fight and whom do you fight is the next question.
The only challenge I have with this issue of corruption being fought by our president is that  it seems skewed. Charity, they say, should begin from your own home. When you begin from there, then people will take you more seriously.
I go back to the Bible which says that judgment will start from the church. Whenever I see my children and others doing wrong, I usually begin with my children to set example for the others. That is how it should be. On this issue of fight against corruption in Nigeria, I will speak out loud to say that it is skewed, it is biased kind off. Look at the people that have been really dealt with, it has just been one sided and that is not a good way of fighting corruption. If you must fight corruption, let it touch every angle. I am not happy about this selective fight against corruption.
And what’s your take on the military operations against suspected criminals in Rivers State?
Again the question is how? Fight against crime and criminals is a welcome development anywhere because we need peace and security. But how do you go about this? Prior to this time we’ve never had a situation where the federal authorities will give instruction and before you know it, security men will invade everywhere. Indeed, if it is the federal government that is doing this,, permit me to say that it is very bad. I think that anything that has to do with the security of the state should come from the state. This very one that is happening is very political and it is not too good. Even when the situation was intolerable, we did not experience it this way. If it is a security matter, they should go after them but not individual men that are politicians that should be hunted.

Mrs. Tepikor Anastasia

Mrs. Tepikor Anastasia

Continue Reading

Politics

FG’s Economic Policies Not Working – APC Chieftain

Published

on

A senator who represented Taraba Central, Mr Abubakar Yusuf, has declared that the economic policies of President Bola Tinubu are not yielding the expected results.
His comment is one of the strongest internal critiques yet from within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
The comment underscores the growing dissatisfaction within sections of the ruling party over the direction and impact of the administration’s economic reforms amid rising living costs and fiscal pressures across the country.
Mr Yusuf, who served in the Senate between 2015 and 2023 under the platform of the APC, made the remarks during an appearance on national television.
Responding to a question on whether the administration’s economic direction, often referred to as Tinubunomics, was working, Mr Yusuf answered in the contrary.
“For me, it is not working. I am a member of the APC. I would be the last person to hide the facts”, he said.
He said while the government might be operating diligently within its policy structure, the framework itself is ill-suited to Nigeria’s current realities
“Within the policy framework, yes, they are doing their best, but it is not the framework that is suitable for Nigeria at the point in time that President Asiwaju came into power,” he said.
Mr Yusuf criticised the immediate removal of fuel subsidy on the day the president was sworn in, arguing that the decision lacked sufficient consultation and planning.
“I am one of those who say President Asiwaju ought to have waited. Not on the day he was sworn in to say subsidy is gone. On what basis?”, he asked.
He urged broader engagement before major fiscal decisions are taken.
“Sit down with your cabinet, sit down with your ministers, sit down with your advisers,” he said, dismissing the argument that subsidy removal was justified solely on grounds of corruption.
The former lawmaker identified “structural flaws” in the country’s budgeting system, particularly the envelope budgeting model.
“One of the basic problems is that before you budget, you should have a plan. The envelope system we have been operating has been you budget before you plan. That has been a major issue”, he said.
He argued that allocating spending ceilings without aligning them to concrete development strategies inevitably weakens implementation and delivery.
“If you give me an envelope which is contrary to my plan, whether it is plus or minus, there is no way I am going to implement my plan. It is bound to fail,” he said.
Mr Yusuf called for the scrapping of the envelope budgeting system, noting that he had consistently opposed it even during his years in the National Assembly.
“It is not good for us. It is not going to work well for us,” he said.
He further blamed poor capital releases and persistent deficit financing for undermining budget performance over the years.
“We could not meet 60 percent of our capital budget in all these years. No releases. If you make a budget and the release is very poor, there is no way the budget will be executed”, he stated.
According to him, weak fund disbursement mechanisms and reliance on deficit financing have entrenched a cycle of underperformance.
“Our budget ought to have been a surplus budget, but all our budgets have always been deficit financing budgets,” Mr Yusuf added.

Continue Reading

Politics

Reps To Meet,’Morrow Over INEC’s 2027 Election Timetable

Published

on

The Nigerian House of Representatives has resolved to reconvene for an emergency session tomorrow February 17, 2026, to deliberate on issues arising from the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) release of the timetable for the 2027 general elections.
The decision was disclosed in a statement issued by the House Spokesman, Rep. Akin Rotimi, who described the electoral body’s announcement as one of “constitutional and national significance.”
INEC had fixed February 20, 2027, for the Presidential and National Assembly elections.
According to the statement, members of the Green Chamber were notified of the emergency sitting through an internal memorandum from the Speaker’s office.
The session is expected to focus on legislative matters connected to the newly released timetable, reflecting the House’s resolve to act promptly on issues affecting the nation’s democratic process.
Rep. Rotimi noted that all related businesses would be treated with urgency and urged lawmakers to prioritise attendance in view of the importance of the deliberations.
INEC had on Friday formally unveiled the comprehensive schedule for the 2027 polls, including timelines for party primaries slated for July to September 2026, as well as the commencement of Continuous Voter Registration in April 2026.
The development comes amid ongoing consultations and proposed amendments to the Electoral Act ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Politics

Group Continues Push For Real Time Election Results Transmission

Published

on

As the controversy over the transmission of election results continues across the country, the Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), a pro democracy organisation in the country, has criticised the National Assembly for not giving express approval to real time transmission of elections results.
To this end, the group is calling on all civil society organisations in the country to mobilise and push for a better Electoral Reform in the country.
This was contained in a press statement titled, “Defence For Human Rights and Democracy Demands Real Time Election Transmission of Result”, a copy of which was made available to newsmen in Port Harcourt.
The group described the refusal of compulsory real time transmission of result results by the Senate as undemocratic, adding that the situation will give room for election manipulation, rigging and voters apathy.
It said that the provision of mandatory real time transmission of election results would have significant improvement on the nation’s democracy.
According to the statement, “Since the return of democracy in 1999 to date, it is 27 years, so our Democracy has metamorphosed from being nascent and as such significant improvement should have been recorded.
“Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), is really disappointed at the National Assembly, especially the upper chamber (Senate) for not approving ‘Real Time Electronic Transmission of Election Result’.
“This undemocratic act of theirs, if not tamed, will give room for election manipulation and rigging’”.
Signed by Comrade Clifford Christopher Solomon on behalf of the organisation, the statement further said, “The Defence For Human Rights and Democracy unequivocally supports real time transmission of election result”, stressing that his group will resist any act by the National Assembly to undermine the nation’s democracy.
“DHRD,unequivocally supports ‘True Democracy’, which is Government of the people, by the people and for the people.
“Therefore, anything that will crash the hope of Nigerians to Freely, Fairly and Transparently elect candidates of their choice in any given election should and will be vehemently resisted because good governance begins with leaders elected through credible process. By so doing, leaders have entered a social contract with the citizens to equitably manage their affairs and abundant resources”, the statement added.
It urged the National Assembly to revisit the issue in order to avoid civil unrest.
According to the DHRD, “To avoid civil unrest,voters apathy, election rigging and manipulation, rather to promote citizens participation, advancing our Democracy and entrenching free, fair, credible and acceptable electoral outcome, the National Assembly should amend the electoral act in a manner that will deepen our democracy and boost citizens confidence.
“On this note, The Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), is calling on all other civil society organisations (CSOs) to mobilise, organise and push for a better electoral act amendment by the National Assembly”.

By: John Bibor

Continue Reading

Trending