Opinion
For Traditional Rulers’ Constitutional Role
The clamour for a constitutional role for tra
ditional rulers in the 1999 constitution is getting stronger by the day, following their relevance and closeness to the people.
The call comes at a most suitable time as the constitution is being reviewed. I think at this point the call can no longer be ignored. Because of the important role traditional rulers play in stablising the polity, there is need for the constitution to define these roles and legalise them. This will make them to be part of the governance of the country. Such constitutional provisions if granted, will state which tier of government they will participate in, local government, state or federal and whether they will operate in advisory capacity.
Prior to the colonization of our country by the British, traditional institution was very powerful. In fact, chiefs had what I may refer to as “absolute” power which they exercised unrestrained before the British colonial masters cut short their powers. Now the institution has been relegated to the background. It is virtually non-existent. Technocrats and politicians have taken over its place.
The near extinction of this institution has had negative impact on the society. First, it has led to widespread insecurity in the country as traditional rulers can no longer restrain their subjects. It has also resulted in total breakdown of traditional values which had preserved our society before the advent of Western system of government.
If I am asked to compare the way we fared when we were under our traditional institution and how we fare now, the answer is not far-fetched. We were better off under our traditional heads. This is because the traditional system guaranteed close association with everyone in one’s immediate society.
There was no hiding place and everyonewas known and properly identified.
I think if our traditional institution had remained intact, the security challenges currently faced by the country, would not have gone far or even sustained to this point.
That is why the institution has to be resuscitated for effective partnership with the government in the business of governance. I believe if this partnership works, the chiefs or traditional rulers are capable of proferring solutions to the smooth governance of the country. It will also facilitate the development of the various communities.
If Nigerians apportion roles to our traditional rulers in the 1999 Constitution currently undergoing amendment, it will impose limitations on the actions and excesses of traditional rulers who hitherto play God in their various domains. Rather they will be made to account for their actions or inactions to the people.
Like their elected counterparts in government who are subjected by legislation to operate within checks and balances, a constitutional role for our traditional rulers may produce similar effects. The institution may have to be properly structured in a way that the usual checks and balances may be achieved.
Indeed, time has come when the traditional and religions institutions are given their proper places in our statute books. The reason is that these are the oldest institutions the world has ever known and they had preserved society long before the institution of what is today known as government.
However, with the advent of the current Western government came all sorts of vices which included the denigration of the traditional institution. This has exposed the once highly revered institution to undue political influence. Today, instead of remaining as custodians of our traditions and value system, our chiefs have turned politicians hence exposing the traditional institution to all manner of political influence.
This was an institution that was once immuned from politics which also stood on truth and justice. Although some persons are opposed to granting constitutional roles to traditional rulers in the country, I think such views are unfair to the rulers. The antagonists of this position have failed to consider the fact that traditional rulers are the closest to the people and so deserve that role. They have more control over the people than a million government soldiers put together can have.
If traditional rulers were not important, why was there a House of Chiefs in the old regional government? The house was established to play advisory role to the government of the day. The same thing can be replicated in principle in our time.
Agomuo, a Public Affairs Analyst, wrote from Omuma.
Godspower Agomuo
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Sports4 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports4 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports4 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports4 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports4 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports4 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports4 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics4 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension