Connect with us

Politics

Challenges Before Election Petition Tribunals

Published

on

The April 2011 general elections have come and gone with the good people of  Rivers State looking forward to a successful inauguration of Governor Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi on May 29.

The political and electoral ripples from the elections are yet to settle down as opposition political parties’ candidates are challenging and ventilating their electoral grievances  over the unsatisfactory conduct and outcome of the April general elections before Election Petition Tribunals in the state.

However,  defeated candidates of the opposition political parties are challenging the declaration of the (PDP) candidates declared winners in the April 9th National Assembly Election and April 26th Governorship/House of Assembly elections.

On the Governorship, four opposition political parties candidates of All Grand Progressive Alliance (APGA), Sir Celestine Omehia, Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) Dr. Abiye Sekibo, Action Alliance (AA) Chief Hon. Aleruchi William, and African Political System (APS) Chief Hon. Felix Amadi are challenging the election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi of the PDP.

In Election Petition No. EPT/Gov./PH/27/2011 filed by legal counsel C.O. Ejezie Esq. of J.C. Ezike & Co. c/o Omehia & Associates 2A Ikwerre Road for Sir Celestine Omehia & APGA as Petitioners against Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi and three others as respondents, APGA and its candidate’s  grounds for their Petition are that contrary to S.182 (1) (g) of the 1999 (CFRN) & the Electoral Act S.138 (a) 2010 as amended, the first and second respondents being Governor Amaechi & Deputy Governor  Tele Ikuru are not qualified being  persons employed in the public service of Rivers State and therefore did not resign or withdraw or retire from the said employment thirty days to the date of the Governorship election held on April 26th, 2011.

Secondly, that by Provison of the S.138 (b) (c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended, that the election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi is invalid by reason of corrupt practices or non compliance with the provision of this Act and that the 1st and 2nd respondents were not duly elected by majority of lawful votes cast at the election.

In Election petition No. EPT/GOV/PH/21/2011 filed by G.O. Tamuno Esq. for Dr. Abiye Sekibo and ACN as the petitioners against election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi, PDP and INEC as respondents, are challenging the Election based on S. 138 (b) & (c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.

Dr. Abiye Sekibo further averred that there were widespread irregularities and malpractices that substantially affected the outcome of the election in his favour, coupled with the fact that Ad-hoc staff of INEC were substituted for supporters of the respondents.

In the election petitions No. EPT/GOV/PH/37/2011, Chief Hon. Felix Amadi, candidate of the African Political System (APS) filed by Ahameke Ejelam Esq. of Principles law Partnership and Chief Hon. Aleruchi William, candidate of Action Alliance in Election Petition No. EPT/GOV/PH/39/2011, filed by M.N. Nnamani Esq c/o St. Michael Solicitors, they are separately challenging their unlawful exclusion from the Governorship Election of April 26th in the State in accordance with S. 138 (d) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.

Chief Hon. Felix Amadi and Chief Hon. Alurechi Williams and their political parties respectively are seeking for the nullification of the April 26th Governorship election by reason of unlawful exclusion, an order for bye-election or re-run, or fresh Governorship election, an order canceling or withdrawing the certificate of Return issued to the Governor-elect and an order restraining the Governor-elect from being sworn in or acting as Governor or performing the functions of Governor of Rivers State.

Awanen Jas Esq, legal practitioner said, “the Petitioners having presented their petitions and grounds of the facts of the petition, the legal fireworks have started and behold their respected Justices of the Tribunal are to sip through the facts and arrive at their findings”.

However, Rivers State like other states of the Federation has two Election Petition Tribunals. The Governorship Election  Petition Tribunal and the National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal.

The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal was formally inaugurated on Friday, 20th May 2011 in High Court 16 Port Harcourt with Justice (Mrs) A.A. Wambai (Chairman), Justice O.N. Anyachelelu and Justice A.B. Abdul Kareem as members.

Justice A.A. Wambai promised that the tribunal shall be transparent and honest in all their dealings and advised counsel to always conduct themselves with utmost decorum while appearing before the tribunal without unnecessary delay.

Prior to the formal inauguration in Port Harcourt, having been sworn in, in  Abuja, the Assistant Secretary of the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal in Rivers Abubakar  Mohammed, said that the Tribunal had entertained two Ex Parte Motions brought by two defeated Governorship candidates in the state and the Ex parte motions were granted for the inspection of the Electoral materials used by the INEC for the April 26th Governorship Election in the state.

Mr. Sulieman, Assistant Secretary, National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal said “that the Tribunal is yet to be inaugurated in Port Harcourt and therefore the names of the Tribunal chairman and members are not yet available”.

Mr. Sulieman further said that in accordance with S.285 (5) of the 1999 Constitution as amended for election Petition to be filed within 21 days after the date of declaration of result of the election, the National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal in the State received (9) nine House of Representatives and  five Senate Election Petitions, challenging the winners of the Elections of the National Assembly conducted on 9th April 2011. while out of the 32 seats in the state Assembly, election of 22 members are being challenged before the Tribunal with only 10 members having their election not being challenged.

Meanwhile, Emmanuel C. Ukala (SAN) Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) section on Legal Practice said “Election Petitions are regarded in law as “Sui generis” in nature, meaning they are neither civil proceedings nor criminal proceedings strict sensu but are rather in a class of their own with special regulator regimes which requires strict compliance”.

The Tribunals are generally ad-hoc in nature and are to be constituted not later than 14 days before the election and when constituted, open their registries for business 7 days before the election per section 133 (2) (a) & (b) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.

In view of the past controversies that had trailed several Election Petition Tribunals and their judgements, members of the various Election Petition Tribunals have been enjoined to ensure transparency in the midst of the mounting challenges.

Awanen Jas Esq., legal practitioner, said Justices of the Election Petition Tribunals should hold high the integrity of the bench by discharging their responsibilities in a way, that will restore confidence and credibility to the Judiciary.

Abbiye Suku Esq., legal practitioner based in Port Harcourt and a law lecturer, said justices of the various Election Petition Tribunals should ensure that judgements are dispensed with a sense of justice.

They must work within the limit of the timelines to ensure justice is done without unnecessary legal technicalities by counsel.

However, members of the tribunal must ensure that Justice is not only seen to be done but must be done based on facts by the petitioners and Respondents, only then can the Judiciary be the last hope of the common man to restore confidence in the Electoral processes.

Philip-Wuwu Okparaji

Continue Reading

Politics

CSO Seeks Review Of Judgment Sacking Zamfara Rep For Joining APC

Published

on

A coalition of civil society organisations has called for a review of the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which sacked Hon. Abubakar Gummi, the lawmaker representing Gummi/Bukkuyum Federal Constituency of Zamfara State, for defecting from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Operating under the umbrella of the Coalition of Civil Society Network, the group described the ruling delivered by Justice Obiora Egwuatu as unfair and contrary to the spirit of democracy, urging the judiciary to consider the will of the people in its final determination of the matter.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, had on Thursday, October 30, sacked Gummi for defecting from the PDP, which sponsored his election, to the APC.

In his ruling, Justice Egwuatu held that it was morally wrong for a politician to transfer votes from one political party to another, stating that “political prostitution must not be rewarded.”

He declared that voters elect candidates based on the manifestos and ideals of their political parties. Therefore, it was both legally and morally unacceptable for an elected official to abandon that platform without relinquishing the mandate.

The court also restrained the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, from recognising Hon. Gummi as a member of the House, and ordered him to refund all salaries and allowances received from October 30, 2024, to the date of judgment.

Justice Egwuatu further directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a fresh election within 30 days to fill the vacant seat.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1803/2024, was filed by the PDP and its Zamfara State chairman, Jamilu Jibomagayaki, who argued that Hon. Gummi’s defection violated Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as there was no division within the PDP to justify his action.

But convener of the coalition, Lukman Muhammad, who addressed journalists at a press conference in Abuja on Saturday, said Hon. Gummi’s defection was a direct result of the unresolved internal crisis within the PDP, which, according to him, crippled the lawmaker’s ability to effectively represent his constituents.

He said: “We believe the court’s decision was unjust and failed to consider the circumstances surrounding Hon. Gummi’s defection. Gummi’s decision to join the APC was necessitated by the unresolved internal crisis within the PDP, which hindered his ability to effectively represent his constituents.

“We affirm that Hon. Gummi’s right to choose his political affiliation is protected by the Constitution and should be respected. We stand for democracy and the rule of law, while also urging the judiciary to consider the will of the people and the greater good”.

He urged Justice Egwuatu to review the judgment, stressing that the ruling could set a dangerous precedent that undermines the principle of fair representation and the rights of elected officials.

The coalition further noted that the judgment has broader implications for Nigeria’s democratic process, as it raises questions about the extent to which lawmakers can exercise their constitutional freedom of association without fear of losing their mandate.

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP, NNPP, Others Blame Tinubu For Defections To APC 

Published

on

Opposition parties have accused President Bola Tinubu of using public resources and anti-graft agencies to pressure opposition members into joining the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The parties stated that the APC was on the verge of collapse following the recent wave of defections from opposition parties into its ranks.

In separate interviews with The Tide source, spokespersons for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), and the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) —Debo Ologunagba, Oladipo Johnson, and Mark Adebayo – respectively, said an implosion was imminent in the APC.

But the APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, stated that recent defections to the party were voluntary and inspired by the ruling party’s achievements, not through coercion. He added that the APC was well-structured, capable of managing its internal affairs effectively, and therefore would not experience any internal crisis.

In recent months, the ruling APC has continued to receive several high-profile politicians from opposition parties, particularly the PDP. Among those who have joined the APC are Akwa Ibom State Governor, Umo Eno, Delta State Governor, Sheriff Oborevwori, and the PDP’s 2023 vice-presidential candidate, Ifeanyi Okowa.

Most recently, members of the Enugu State Executive Council defected to the APC, a move followed by Governor Peter Mbah’s official declaration for the ruling party on October 14 in Enugu.

On October 15, Bayelsa State Governor, Douye Diri, announced his resignation from the PDP. Although he has yet to join another party, speculation is rife that he is on his way to the APC.

Similarly, Taraba State Governor, Agbu Kefas, confirmed last Wednesday that he would be joining the APC.

Numerous other politicians, including several lawmakers, have also abandoned their parties to align with the ruling APC.

In his reaction, Hon. Ologunagba predicted an imminent crisis within the APC, expressing confidence that those who defected would eventually return to the PDP.

He stated, “This is the major political party (PDP), and it is the only democratic party in the country. It has structures cutting across all the local governments, all the wards, and of course all the states. In every home, there are members of the PDP, and that is why the APC are jittery, and that is why they are coercing our members, using state resources and state agencies to force members of opposition parties to join the ruling party.

“But in all this, we are sure and confident that very soon, the APC will implode because it is a multipurpose political vehicle that is not going to last. It is going to implode.

“Many Nigerians will see through it and know that the party is not a political party that protects the interests of the citizens. So, they are going to leave the party and move to the major political party, which is the PDP. We are optimistic that before 2027, many Nigerians will join us because this is the truly democratic party and the only party that is out there to protect their interests.”

On his part, Mr Johnson of the NNPP lamented that the wave of defections posed a serious threat to the country’s democracy.

Mr Johnson said, “This is bad for democracy. For our type of democracy, it is important to have a proper and effective opposition. Already, we’ve seen a blurring of lines between the legislature and the executive; some would even say the judiciary. I hope not. I think many people are observing the trend and are unhappy. However, we need to be a bit more patient and see what happens soon.

“When the PDP was in power for 16 years, it was the party many people rushed into. Over time, it imploded, and many of those who joined it turned against it. So, I see that happening to the ruling APC. Definitely. This is because of the nature of Nigerian politicians; many are driven by personal interests. I always say that Nigeria can never truly be a one-party state. Even if only one party exists, it will become factionalised, with different interests and power blocs. Those pushing the country toward a one-party system may not have studied Nigeria’s political history carefully.”

In his remarks, CUPP’s Adebayo stated that the pattern of defections among politicians, particularly governors and lawmakers, was a deliberate strategy by the ruling party to transform the country into a one-party state.

Mr Adebayo said, “It is not accidental; it is a deliberate and strategic effort to entrench a one-party dictatorship. Whether these defections are forced or coerced, one thing is clear: it is an intentional action driven by the ruling party, particularly the President.

“This development is unhealthy for our democracy. It is shameful and stands against everything democratic principles represent. It is inimical to the growth and development of Nigeria as a democratic nation and poses a grave threat to our political stability.

“The implosion of the APC will come before or once it loses power. Most Nigerian politicians lack ideological grounding or principles; their loyalty lies only with the party in power. Political affiliation is tied to ideology and conviction, not convenience. However, the ideology of most politicians is simply the ruling party. If tomorrow the ADC, Labour Party, or SDP wins the presidency, many of these same politicians will abandon the APC overnight. They have no shame, no conviction, and no conscience. Their only motivation is proximity to power.”

In response, Mr Ibrahim of the APC maintained the APC would not face any internal crisis, asserting that it has the capacity to effectively manage its affairs, unlike the opposition.

He stated, “The fact that the opposition are not organised and they cannot organise primaries, neither can they manage their parties, does not mean we are on the same boat with them. Our party, the APC, has been conducting primaries successfully and rancor-free.

“So, the fact that they don’t know how to manage their party does not mean that is the way we run our own party. The APC does not coerce anyone to join. Those joining are doing so willingly because of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope achievements. Our party is fully prepared. It’s not going to implode; it’s not going to have any issues similar to the issues they have been having.”

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Ndume Blames FG, Senate For Nigeria’s ‘Country Of Particular Concern’ Designation By Trump

Published

on

Former Senate Chief Whip and current Senator representing Borno South, Ali Ndume, has blamed the President Bola Tinubu’s administration and the Senate for the tagging of Nigeria by the United States President, Donald Trump, as ‘Country of Particular Concern’.

Senator Ndume, in a statement on Saturday in Abuja, accused both the executive and legislative arms of complacency, saying their failure to proactively engage the United States government on the alleged persecution of Christians in Nigeria led to the development.

The senator recalled that he had earlier sponsored a motion in the Senate on “Christian genocide” in the country. The motion, he said, led to resolutions mandating the Nigerian government to engage the U.S. with verified facts and figures.

President Trump, last Friday, announced the designation of Nigeria as a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ over alleged persecution of Christians.

President Trump made the announcement via a post on his Truth Social platform, which was also shared on the official White House X handle.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter,” President Trump wrote.

But the Nigerian government swiftly rejected the claims, insisting that President Trump’s assessment did not reflect the true situation in the country.

However, Senator Ndume accused the President Tinubu’s administration and the Senate of treating the allegation raised by US lawmaker, Riley Moore, with complacency, prior to President Trump’s declaration, and urged the federal government to take urgent steps to engage the US government with facts and figures on the activities of terrorists organisations which, he noted, were blind to faith.

“I have alerted the government, I even moved a motion. Nigeria is a sovereign state, it isn’t about what the United States can do to us, but about the misconception and the ripple effects of classifying us as a country of concern.

“We should engage the American government by presenting facts and figures. By engaging the US government, we should demand that they hear the other side of the story from the Nigerian government and the Muslim community. Muslims have been killed too. The genocide isn’t against Christians but Nigerians generally,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

Trending