Opinion
Controversial Issues In Nigerian Education System
Education stands for the general process of inculcating knowledge, ideas, skills, etc. into an individual. Therefore, it is relevant and proper to trace the origin of education in Nigeria beyond the early days of colonialism in West African sub-region. What the whites brought to us could be termed as formal education, whereas informal education was in active existence prior to the arrival of the imperialists.
We had a situation where the male children were trained on wide areas of vocation like farming, hunting, fishing, etc. by their fathers, while their female counterparts often help their mothers at home in performing some chores like cooking, sweeping, washing, etc. as some were also trained on petty trade by their mothers.
A logical analysis/comparison of our native system of education and the one introduced to us by the westerners, unveils the fact that the former is more practical-oriented than the latter. Behind every meaningful and sustainable development in science and technology, and otherwise, there must be a practical-driven form of education. The enormous industrial and technological achievements of the Western world and some Asian countries-India, China, and South Korea, cannot be separated from their systems of education. If England for instance, has recorded huge success today in terms of development, why then Nigeria still struggles with under-development since she inherited her system of education from them? Change remains the only permanent force in nature. It is safe to assume that England recognised the need to change her hitherto theoretical system of education so as to adapt to the fast transformation of global activities to science and technology. Unfortunately, Nigeria tends to be myopic and static with her system of education. The overall inefficiency inherent in all the sectors in Nigeria today, boils down to our faulty and obsolete system of education.
There are many challenges confronting our present education system. Consider a sitatuon where a child will spend twelve years in primary and secondary schools respectively, just to basically prepare himself for the almighty WAEC and JAMB examinations. Meaning that those who cannot afford to go beyond the secondary school level are bound to be useless to the larger society. Even though most of the subjects taught in secondary schools much as Introductory Technology, Home Economics, Wood Work, Food and Nutrition, etc, are practical-oriented, hardly do you see the students being educated on the practical aspect of those subjects.
The minds of the pupils and the students alike are saturated with theoretical teachings and this runs counter to the basic principles of teaching and learning which upholds that the learner should be developed on the bases of Cognitive Domaiu (Head), Affective Domain (Heart) and Psychomotor Domain (Hand).
Certainly, it is difficult for our economy to foster and flourish when our higher institutions produce half-baked graduates. The cause of this ugly trend can only be traced to the preceding circumstances surrounding the entry of our candidates into the Ivory Towers. The majority of the public school heads and more than 98% of the private school owners have entirely commercialised education in this country. The menace is more devastating in private schools where discipline, integrity, principle and quality have been crucified at the alter of profit maximisation. Teaching and learning are carried out in uncconducive atmosphere while teachers are employed not on the basis of qualification but based on utmost consideration to cost minimisation so as to increase profit. Imagine a situation where a single teacher takes more than five subjects. Or worse, still, s situation where some who red English language is employed to teach Mathematics and other science subjects.
The examination bodies like WAEC, NECO and JAMB do not help issues as they collect money from the candidates and expose the questions to them before the examination takes place. Despite that, the parents on their own side are willing to pay any amount of money to the examination supervisors and mercenaries alike in order to secure good grades for their children. Little wonder, the proliferation of miracle centers in our society today. Somebody who does not run a school will collect huge amount of money from different people and give some proportion of the money to a school owner who will in turn allow him register the candidates in his school, and during the examination the middle man will simply go to the school, pick up the question papers and the answer scripts of his candidates and go to a near-by private house where the examination exercise of his special candidates will take place.
Sadly, it is our economy in general that bears the brunt of the flaws in our educational system. Actually, I don’t mean to suggest that nothing is entirely good with our system of education. As a matter of fact, some aspects of our national Policy on Education, especially the 6-33-4 ideology are quite expedient. But the problem deeply lies with the implementation of such ideas. There is need to precisely define areas of priority in our school system. Instead of wasting time and resources teaching a child those subjects that cannot earn him a living in the larger society, I think more attention should be focused on core skill acquisition programmes. A child who is properly trained on the practical aspect of subjects like Wood Works, Introductory Technology, Home Economics, etc. must not go to university before he becomes useful and functional to the society. More so, areas of study should be introduced based on the present need of Nigerian economy. Our utmost need for the diversification of our economy, proffers a challenging atmosphere for us to through our school system train those that will provide quality services to industries and factories.
Our 21st century dream of robust economy will only become a reality if the government realises the urgent need to allocate more funds to the education sector so as to re-brand it to become more practical-driven at all levels. To achieve success in this dimension, overseeing the affairs of the schools should not be left in hands of the school heads alone. Rather there should be a team of well qualified and experienced educationist from different fields that will frequently monitor and evaluate the performances of both public and private primary and post-primary schools for the purposes of accreditation and de-accreditation of areas of study so as to sustain quality standard in our schools.
Further more, since the examination bodies are also culprits in the crime of examination malpractice, the top officials and the rank and files of the examination bodies in the country should henceforth be held accountable and punished severely whenever there is leakage of question papers prior to the examination. Concerning the miracle centers, government should device a means of getting first hand facts by having its own candidates confidentially registered in any private/public schools suspected to be involved in the perpetration of this anti-development crime. The owner/head of any school found to be guilty in this direction should be jailed without option of fine, the school closed down permanently and its property confiscated by the government.
The time to act is now, No price can be too big to be paid in order to rescue the mother or the starting point of our development – Education – from the shackles of decadence, theoretical ideas and general stagnation.
Ego is a student of Mass Communication Dept.
RSUST, Nkpolu.
Ndukwu Ego
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Rivers5 days ago
Shippers Council moves To Enhance Service Delivery At Nigerian Ports
-
Nation5 days agoCommunity Health Practitioners Marks 2025 Week
-
Rivers5 days agoRivers Community Absolves Kingsman of Land Grabbing Allegations, Gives Seven-Day Ultimatum
-
Nation5 days agoOgoni Cleanup Programme, Enabling Pathways To Development Of Ogoni – Zabbey
