Editorial

Insurance Cover For Nigerian Journalists

Published

4 years ago

November 8, 2021

The age-long demand by right-meaning Nigerians for all journalists in the country to be provided with insurance cover to protect and bolster them to discharge their responsibilities effectively was reiterated by the President, Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE), Mr Mustapha Isah, during an interview with reporters in Abuja.
Isah indicated that such an insurance policy would motivate journalists to go the extra mile to pick up credible stories and disseminate reliable information. According to him, “insurance cover for journalists in the country was an urgency and would promote their resolve, increase performance and productivity in the media enterprise. Journalists in Nigeria are practising in a complicated and occasionally dangerous atmosphere, putting their lives on the line.”
“Some of us were infected in the process. Also, some journalists lost their lives in Kano and Abuja during the Shi’a protest. As we speak now, a reporter from Vanguard Newspaper is missing and has not been found. Journalists should have insurance cover. CNN would not take you without getting an insurance cover for you. That is why their journalists would be audacious to report even from the war front,” the NGE president declared.
Last year, the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) made an identical proposal to the Federal Government and diverse stakeholders to procure life assurance for journalists, who are on the frontline in the coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic. The union also called for the provision of sufficient and effective Personal Protection Equipment (PPEs) and palliatives to mitigate the suffering these journalists encounter daily while on their various duties.
The National President of the NUJ, Chris Isiguzo, stated: “We call on the federal and state governments to take note of the fact that journalists, like in conflict situations, are daily exposed to grave danger as a result of their professional calling. Accordingly, we call for life insurance for journalists, who are on the frontline in the coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic, provision of adequate and effective Personal Protection Equipment (PPEs) and palliatives to ease hardships they daily encounter while on their respective assignments.”
Many vocations are acknowledged to pose no actual danger to the wellbeing and contentment of their practitioners. However, the same cannot be said about journalism. Being a practising journalist is among the most precarious tasks that anybody could undertake in, not in the least because of the environment in which journalists labour.
Because journalists traverse any height to investigate and uncover facts and publish the same, some of which may be delicate and at variance with certain vested interests, they usually discover themselves in conditions that pose considerable risk and peril to their wellbeing, and indeed lives. This is besides the impediment of meeting deadlines to enter reports and stories to their media organisations.
A UNESCO report of the International Programme for Development of Communication (IPDC) titled, “Journalists’ Safety Indicators (JSI) — Related Project in Nigeria 2014 — 2015″, initiated a survey known as “Baseline Audit on State of Safety of Journalists in Nigeria” showing that “a total of 47 attacks against journalists were documented during the time; the attacks affected journalists from 22 national and foreign media channels; four of the 47 attacks were directed against female journalists”.
Reporters Without Borders in a 2012 report entitled “Daily Abuses Suffered by Nigerian Journalists” chronicled various designs and proportions of challenges encountered by journalists in the practice of their occupation, either functioning as freelancers or as employees of their media organisations. These stretch from harassment, threats, arrests, incursions, confinements, confiscation, and destruction to equipment and other assets, consisting of premises, to homicides, and civil suits for defamation and slander.
Recent developments in the national, cross-border and global polity have placed a lot of attention on the safety, sustainability, value, rights and moral status of the average journalist. Nigerian journalists put themselves through arduous, often uncharted channels to ensure that democracy has its loftiest expression. That is why we identify with the request for members of the profession to be granted insurance cover by their employers, whether government or private.
During the nationwide anti-SARS protests in October last year, journalists took notable risks to report the incident. Many of them would have been assailed or shot at while covering the riots. Such journalists could have become martyrs. What would have been the fate of their families with no insurance coverage? Members of the Fourth Estate of the Realm have the right to better treatment given that they toil very hard to keep the nation informed and endanger their lives in the process. Their ideas have boosted democracy in the country and held us united.
We request the National Assembly to pass a law that would make it imperative for all Nigerian journalists to have insurance cover. The NUJ must equally make it mandatory for all journalists to be insured. This is crucial because of the hazards linked with the occupation. Nigerian journalists are repeatedly at the fore, and it is the duty of the nation to safeguard them and their households. Therefore, insurance coverage would guarantee the future of the family of every journalist, if anything goes awry.
It is not about eulogising members of the press in the land, but if they must perform in the manner they should, there is a need to cater for them and the initial step is to provide them with insurance cover. The Fourth Estate of the Realm is profoundly significant to the socio-economic development of Nigeria. So, it is time the nation stopped fiddling with the lives of journalists.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.