Opinion
The Problem With ASUU Strikes
Whenever the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) embarks on its usual strike actions the questions that willingly assail my mind are when shall we see an end to these strikes? When will ASUU engage other means to press home their demands? When will the Federal Government observe pacts it signs with the academic union?
When will our government take quality education passionately and see the essential nexus between sound education and national development? When will the authorities move from paying lip service to the funding of education to the actual financing of the sector? I wish finding answers to these questions would dominate deliberations between the striking lecturers and the federal authorities.
ASUU says the latest strike action is over the non-implementation of the Memorandum of Action (MOA) it signed with the Federal Government in 2017. Its National President, Professor Biodun Ogunyemi, affirmed it and said the strike would be total and cover both federal and state-owned universities. Truly, most public institutions are already incapacitated.
The problem with ASUU is their predilection for doing one thing over and again and expect a different result. No, sir. Since strikes have failed to produce the desired results, why not develop a better means of communicating grievances?
For remarkably obvious reasons industrial actions have never solved any problem bedevilling university education in the country. And since Nigeria is the most populous nation in Africa, frequent trade disputes will surely negate its reputation in the comity of nations.
Given the multitude of problems public universities encounter and the frequent face-off between lecturers and the government over numerous unresolved issues, one is not consternated that the strike came at this time. ASUU was already standing by waiting for the least inducement to commence the industrial action.
As always, ASUU has good reasons for commencing their strike action, particularly given that universities in our clime are completely bereft of some welfare schemes their counterparts in more developed countries take for granted.
For instance, there is gross variation of academic calendar that observes the closing and resumption of universities at different periods. The quality of graduates is abysmally low; indigent students are denied loans while funding of higher institutions is poor. The question is why did previous strikes fail to address those issues?
I believe if both ASUU and the Federal Government are sincere and appreciate the issues at stake, they can be talked over. They have to realise the immeasurable damage failure to do so will cost the nation’s education. First, academic calendars will be disrupted and may be adjusted to the disadvantage of the students and systematically disparage them.
Some of the students may join crime venture to keep themselves busy while awaiting resumption. Such students may get prosecuted and jailed or even killed outrightly. Those and many more are some of the evil incessant strikes by lecturers can wreck education at tertiary level.
The Vice Chancellor of Benue State University, Prof. Msugh Kembe, while reacting to the current strike advised that it was causing a great disservice to university education and distorting the academic calendar of universities in the country.
Prof. Kembe said, “Let me emphasise here that due to ongoing strike by ASUU, we have asked our students to go back home and this will surely truncate academic calendar of the university.
“For instance, when a student is coming from a foreign country to study in Nigeria for a course of four years, he ends up spending more years due to strikes; this is causing disservice to the universities, particularly the public universities. At the end of the day, private universities will be enjoying the patronage of foreign students more than the public universities,” he stated.
The eminent professor simply stated the immediately obvious. A requirement for assessing universities worldwide is consistency in running their academic calendars and the presence of foreign students in such universities. But strikes discourage such students from patronising public-owned tertiary institutions.
Certainly, lack of commitment on the part of government is at the very root of this perennial crisis. It is embarrassing how government could take delight in starving the varsities of funds while throwing huge sums of money on politics and unbeneficial matters.
It is time the Nigerian government thought seriously about the lingering issues it has with ASUU and address them once and for all to save the country from discomposure. Education has so much to do with the future of a country.
Failure to resolve the conflict only indicates that the authorities are not interested in public universities because the children of top politicians and rich Nigerians patronise private universities at the prejudice of public institutions.
By: Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
