Opinion
Sharing The Recovered Fund
It is no longer news that Nigeria is currently the poverty headquarters of the world. In a recent report by the Brooklings Institution, Nigeria is said to have overtaken India as the country with the highest number of extreme poor people in the world.
According to the report, Nigeria now has over 87 million people living in poverty and every minute, six more Nigerians become poor.
In 2016 The National Bureau of Statistics had painted a worse picture when it reported that no fewer than 112 million Nigerians live below the poverty line.
Why this high rate of poverty in Nigeria? Three major reasons have been deduced by experts. They are income inequality and unemployment, ethnic conflict/ civil unrest, political instability and corruption. It is therefore expected that any responsible government both at the federal, state and local government level who sincerely wants to tackle poverty will start by tackling these key problems. Such government should invest greatly in human capital development and prioritize infrastructural development as these will increase economic growth and of course reduce poverty.
On this premise, it is therefore surprising that the federal government decided that the best way to alleviate poverty in the country is to share recovered looted fund to some selected poor people. The federal government had indicated that the $322 million repatriated from the accounts of former Head of State, late General Sani Abacha in Switzerland will be distributed to “vulnerable Nigerians”. The Federal Government had said it would commence the disbursement of the fund through Conditional Cash Transfers to 302,000 poor households in 19 states this July. The states include: Niger, Kogi, Ekiti, Osun, Oyo, Kwara, Cross River, Bauchi, Gombe, Jigawa, Benue, Taraba, Adamawa, Kano, Katsina, Kaduna, Plateau, Nasarrawa, Anambra and Internally Displaced Persons Camps (IDPS) will benefit from the fund leaving 17 other states with nothing.
Not a few Nigerians have expressed concerns on not only the choice of sharing the fund but on the criteria for selecting prospective beneficiaries and their states. Questions like how will government prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the so-called 302,000 names on the list are truly the right people? Won’t there be ‘ghost’ poor people involved? Won’t there be cases of funds diversion to politicians’ accounts? What is even the guarantee that the so-called 302,000 poor households are not cardholders of political parties, especially at a time that elections are just around the corner? For how long will the benefiting households receive the monthly stipend of N5, 000 each? What happens to the poor people when the recovered money is exhausted?, have been asked.
One reason for high poverty rate in the country as earlier stated is ethnic conflict/ civil unrest. Is it not worrisome that if the federal government insists on going on with the fund’s sharing formula where some geopolitical zones have more benefiting states than the other, that it may create some bad blood among the citizens and might even lead to more conflict or unrest in the country?
It is therefore advisable that the federal government listens to various advices given by different people on the controversial issue. It’s true that many people in the country are hungry and in need of “stomach infrastructure” but is giving them peanut at the end of the month a lasting solution to their predicament? Come to think of it, what can N5000 really do for a family of five or six in today’s Nigeria? Besides, is life all about having food to eat? What of other need like education, health care, water and others? So why not create the enabling environment that will make these poor Nigerians especially the young and strong ones be gainfully employed and thereby being useful to themselves, their communities and the country at large? What about teaching them how to fish instead of always giving them fish?
It has been often said that when the country eventually gets it right with the issue of poor, there will be an economic boom and virtually every other sector of the economy will start to thrive. Nigerian youth are very creative, hardworking and industrious. What they need basically is constant power supply and a little support from government and they will turn things around positively for the country. So instead of spending the over N100bn on temporary palliative, why not invest it on power project and make sure that it is completed? Or rather as some people have suggested, pump it into the moribund Ajaokuta Steel company which is said to have the capacity to employ ten thousand graduates in addition to thousands of other junior workers and at the same time manufacture steel for the country’s need. What about plunging it into agriculture which will not only ensure food sufficiency in the country but also create plenty of jobs for the people?
So, it good that the federal government wants to help the poor but the right thing should be done. The recovered fund should be invested in a project(s) that can make more impact on the poor, project that will lift more people out of poverty across the nation. It is also important that the citizens be informed of how the millions of dollars repatriated from Switzerland since 2005 and other recovered looted funds have been utilized. The monies belong to the people and they deserve proper accountability.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Politics2 days agoAPC Releases Adjusted Timetable For Nationwide Congresses, Convention
-
Business2 days agoCustoms Seek Support To Curb Smuggling In Ogun
-
Sports2 days ago
DG NIS Wants NSC Board Constituted, Seeks Increased In Funding
-
News2 days ago
Police Bust Kidnapping Syndicate In PH
-
Sports2 days agoSWAN Rivers Set-up Five Functional Committees
-
Sports2 days ago
NSC Disburses N200m Training Grants To 26 Athletes
-
Sports2 days ago
‘NTF Will Build On Davis Cup Success For Brighter Future’
-
Sports2 days ago
Falcon Players Prepare For Title Defense
