Oil & Energy
PIB: Eight Years In Limbo

President Muhammadu Buhari and Senate President Bukola Saraki
When President
Umaru Yar’adua, of blessed memory, assumed office in 2007, the unending crisis rocking the nation’s oil sector, could be said to be at its peak.
He was welcome into office by a turmoil occasioned by mass protest over an overnight and unwarranted increase in the pump prices of petroleum products, inherited from his predecessor, ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo.
As expected of a leader who has the feelings of the people at heart, Yar’Adua, reverted the new pump price to normal, rendering the land mine on his administration impotent, and the masses, ended the protest.
But, he also had the problem of the then Niger Delta militancy (the freedom fighters as they chose to be called), confronting him. There is no gain saying the fact that the colossal destruction caused by the activities of the Niger Delta militants on the nation’s oil and gas infrastructure in the region, brought Nigeria’s economy on its knees.
Again, as expected of a peaceful and caring leader, Yar’Adua intrdocued his famous Amnesty Initiative. Consequent upon this, the staccato sounds of the militants’ guns and the booms of their bombs stopped thereby giving way for peace.
Apparently, after giving a deep thought on the oil sector, considering the fact that it is the lifewire of the nation’s economy, Yar’Adua initiated the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) as a master plan towards bringing sanity in the sector.
The PIB which Yar’Adua presented to the National Assembly as Executive Bill in 2008 stirred up wide jubilation amongst natives of oil-bearing communities because it promised them 20 per cent of equity in oil production. The bill equally promised other goodies to other stakeholders.
However, like a pregnant woman happily welcome into the labour room, eight years after, neither the voice of the child nor that of the mother has been heard as the National Assembly members are yet to agree on issues concerning the PIB. The euphoria that greeted the idea of PIB has given way to anxiety, suspicion and fear.
Is it that the PIB idea is bad and contradicts all expectations of the National Assembly? Such that the lawmakers cannot find any useful thing in the bill? Is it that the alleged cartel that determines what happens in the Nigerian oil sector is not happy and has decided to frustrate and kill the people’s bill? What exactly is the matter with this bill which in many analysists’ views holds a lot of promises to the people?
When Nigerians waited till the end of the sixth National Assembly (2007-2011) and did not see the bill transform into an Act of the Parliament, the impression then was that, because of the high level of importance attached to the bill and the need for the law makers to do thorough work on the bill, it could not be concluded.
But when the then Senate President, David Mark was concluding activities of the 7th National Assembly in 2015 and hurriedly ‘passed through’ his basket full of bills, concerned Nigerians were disappointed that the PIB was not one of the many bills that graduated to Acts of Parliament.
A group, the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) expressed dismay over the failure of the National Assembly to pass the bill, attributing it to politics.
Executive Director of the group, Godwin Ojo, had during a press conference in Lagos accused some of the lawmakers of falling prey to the influence of the oil multinationals who fear that the PIB would rob them of so much unabridged fortune they have been having as far as the nation’s oil industry is concerned.
To Ojo, “some of them became the mouth piece of Shell and other oil companies that threatened to pull out of Nigeria’s oil and gas operations if the PIB was passed.
“They not only betrayed the wishes of the people but succumbed to cheap blackmail of the oil companies that the PIB would render the oil and gas industry unviable”.
It would be recalled that apart from the one submitted by President Yar’Adua, which did not attract the attention of the lawmakers, ex-President Goodluck Jonathan re-introduced the bill to the National Assembly in 2012, which could also not attract the attention of the parliament.
The National Co-ordinator, Niger Delta Youth Coalition (NDYC). Prince Emmanuel Ogba, regretted the attitude of members of the National Assembly to the bill, saying their standing on the way of such a bill shows that the interest of the people was not the main business of those up there, and urged the present senate, led by Bukola Saraki, to make a difference.
Ogba expressed the view that giving 10 per cent of the equity to the host communities would go a long way in bringing peace both for the community and the oil multinationals. This according to him, would provide the conducive atmosphere for better oil operation that would benefit the host, the oil companies and the government.
The youth leader blamed the Federal Government for shortchanging the oil-bearing communities by not providing social amenities as road, water, schools, health infrastructure etc.
“You see, because the oil companies are the ones the community people always see physically, they transfer their grievances to the companies for not providing the infrastructure while in the actual sense of it these should not be the responsibilities of the companies.
In his own reaction, the publisher of News Africa Magazine, Mr Moffat Ekoriko, described the PIB as a National disgrace in that the sixth and seventh National Assemblies could not give Nigerians any explanation as to why they were not able to pass the bill.
“If we are to believe what we got from the grapevine, two factors were responsible for trauncating the bill. Inducement by the multinational oil companies and ethnic interest. Ethic, in the sense that most provisions of the bill were seen as being more favourable to host communities”, he said.
Ekoriko, in an interview with The Tide, said the oil multinationals were uncomfortable with the aspect of the bill which gives 10 per cent equlity to the host communities and the incentive for deep offshore.
“If we are to believe those rumours, it then calls to question the sense of patriotism of the Sixth and Seventh Assemblies”, he said.
The News Africa publisher advised President Muhammadu Buhari to invest his political capital in getting the bill passed, noting that since APC controls both Houses of the National Assembly, there is no reason why a president who is so fair as Buhari cannot wield his party into line.
Another alternative, he said, is to break up the bill so that the non-contentious aspects can pass. He suggested that Buhari should consider leaving the 10 per cent equity to host communities and the incentives for the deep offshore operations and pass the other less contentious aspects of the bill.
“Over the years, the government has been failing the oil communities. They collect tax and always fail to provide amenities. What the oil firms should do is to provide ‘jara’, but ‘jara’ can’t substitute the real thing”, he said stressing that oil companies cannot translate into government of the Niger Delta such that you expect them to provide water, road, healthcare and wondered what should be the responsibilities of the government.
Ekoriko also blamed the interventionist agencies as the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) for lack of clear focus on what to provide.
“While NDDC goes into skills acquisition agriculture, primary healthcare what should go to LGAs and state government, it becomes Jack-of-all-trade and master of none”, he explained.
He said what the region needs is infrastructure as rail line connecting Niger Delta, good road network to make the economy of the region to take off and challenged the Niger Delta Ministry and other relevant agencies to be focused on their statutory responsibilities.
The PIB which should serve the interest of well-meaning Nigerians and stakeholders in the oil sector is one that would fairly address their peculiar needs and fears since it is by so doing that all stakeholders would work as partners in progress.
This spirit will bring to an end the so much acrimony where communities see the oil firms as those short changing them.
The Federal Government which defined and enjoys 60 per cent equity in the joint venture, should be alive to its expected responsibilities to the host communities.
Nigeria desires a PIB that would take definite stand on the issues of gas flaring , oil spill clean-up, local or Nigerian content particularly on expatriate quota, contract awards and also bring an end to the enigma of casualisation in the oil industry.
Those who are so worried about the ubiqiutous influence of the oil multinationals should also know that as stakeholders, the multinational oil companies would not fold their arms on an issue that affects their business interest in Nigeria.
But what one expects is that members of the National Assembly, particularly those from the Niger Delta region should stand up in the interest of Nigeria and not allow themselves to be bought over by other forces protecting their own interest since they are voted to serve their people.
If a thorough job aimed at providing an effective PIB, fair to stakeholders, is done the fear is that there might be a PIB that would be watered down such that it would lose its essence.
The initiator of PIB, Yar’Adua, was a Niger Delta friendly President, same way Goodluck Jonathan was a Northern friendly President and did more for the north. Buhari should declare his position on PIB.
Chris Oluoh
Oil & Energy
The Tofu Brine Battery That Could End the Lithium Era
Researchers in Hong Kong and China have developed a new form of battery that is more eco-friendly and longer lasting than lithium ion batteries – and it runs on tofu brine. The new water battery is still in research phases, but if the technology proves to be scalable enough to hit commercial markets, it could be a game-changer for the energy and tech sectors.
“Compared with current aqueous battery systems … our system delivers exceptional long-term cycling stability and environmental friendliness under neutral conditions,” the research team, composed of scientists from the City University of Hong Kong and Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, Guangdong, said in a paper published this month in Nature Communications.
The researchers found that their battery model can be recharged over 120,000 times. “At over a hundred thousand cycles, this could mean a single water-based battery could last at least a decade or so,” states a recent report on the breakthrough from Interesting Engineering. “For applications like grid storage (solar farms, wind balancing), that’s extremely valuable,” the article went on to say.
This kind of lifespan would represent a drastic improvement over the battery technologies that dominate today’s market. Lithium-ion batteries degrade after between 1,000 and 3,000 charge cycles. This could prove revolutionary, as finding an alternative to lithium-ion batteries to power rechargeable devices is a major priority for Big Tech and the global energy sector.
Moreover, these tofu-brine batteries could prove safer and more environmentally friendly than lithium-ion batteries. According to the study authors, the full cells are environmentally benign and nontoxic and can be directly discarded to environments according to various standards.” Water based (also called aqueous) batteries can also potentially be cheap to produce as they rely on ingredients that are less rare in addition to being less hazardous.
Lithium is environmentally harmful to extract, prone to fires, and its supply chains are geopolitically fraught. Currently, China alone controls half of the global lithium market, and is rapidly increasing its stake. In 2024, more than eight in ten battery cells on the planet were made in China. This means that finding a battery model that can compete with lithium-ion batteries in applications like grid-scale energy storage and electric vehicles would have revolutionary implications for global markets.
Researchers around the world have been racing to develop battery models that could diversify the market and make it more competitive and resilient. These models range widely in size, components, and application, with models currently under development for next-gen sodium-ion batteries, quantum batteries, nuclear batteries, and even sand and dirt batteries.
Of course, the irony is that the leading alternatives to lithium-ion batteries are also being developed in Chinese labs. If this new tofu-brine battery proves scalable and applicable outside of a laboratory environment, it could just be another step toward Beijing’s goal of near-total domination of clean energy technology value chains and status as the world’s first and premiere ‘electro-state.’
China’s extreme advantage in global battery making gives it a major point of leverage in global economies as the world continues to electrify at a rapid pace. It is estimated that European demand for lithium in batteries will reach kilo tonnes (thousands of tonnes) of Lithium Carbonate Equivalent by next year, and North American demand will reach 250 kit LCE. it’s all but certain that the vast majority of that demand will be supplied by China.
Other nations are aware of the risk of this dependency, and are taking pains to protect and promote domestic battery manufacturing, but these efforts may be too little, too late. “For globally competitive battery manufacturing industries to emerge outside of Asia over the next ten years, companies will need to do far more than ensure regulatory compliance,” summarizes a McKinsey & Company report released in January. “Challenges will need to be overcome on multiple fronts spanning supply chains, talent management, operations and technology.”
By: Haley Zaremba
Oil & Energy
REA TO Spend N100bn On Hybrid Mini-grids For Govt Agencies In 2026
The Rural Electrification Agency (REA) says it will spend N100 billion in 2026 to deploy hybrid mini-grids for government agencies within and outside Abuja.
The Managing Directors, REA, Abba Aliyu, disclosed this while addressing newsmen on the sidelines of the 2026 budget defence session
The approved funds form part of the National Public Sector Solarisation programme, a component of the agency’s broader N170 billion budget proposal for 2026.
The initiative is designed to improve electricity reliability for public institutions while reducing operational costs and easing pressure on the national grid.
Aliyu explained that the agency’s total proposed budget for 2026 stands at N170 billion, with N100 billion of the amount dedicated specifically to the solarisation initiative targeting government agencies.
He said the hybrid mini-grid systems combine solar power with complementary energy sources to ensure an uninterrupted electricity supply.
“The total budget size for 2026 operations is N170 billion, out of which N100 billion had been approved for National Public Sector Solarisation.
Aliyu cited the National Hospital in Abuja as an example where similar infrastructure had been deployed to ensure stable power and cut operational expenses.He added that beyond the Solarisation
Recall that earlier in February 2026, REA signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to deploy solar power systems to 15 public institutions across Nigeria.
The project will be implemented under the Regional Off-Grid Electricity Access Project (ROGEAP), a World Bank-supported initiative aimed at expanding off-grid electricity access across West Africa and the Sahel.
ECOWAS will provide a $700,000 grant to fund the installation of solar photovoltaic systems in selected rural health centres and schools in the Federal Capital Territory, Niger, and Nasarawa States.
Oil & Energy
PIA: TotalEnergies Transfers OLO Oilfield HCDT Obligation To Aradel ……Says HCDT Enabled Completion of 100 Projects In 2 years
In his remarks, the Community Affairs Manager, Aradel Holdings Plc, Blessyn Okpowo, affirmed the company’s commitment to honouring all PIA obligations and continuing Total Energies’ community engagement approach.“We want to say that in line with the PIA, we will honour commitments and duties required of the settlor and we want to work very smoothly with the way TotalEnergies has worked with them,” he stated.
He recognised the Commission’s role in approving the Community Development Plan (CDP) before project start, underscoring regulatory excellence.The parties noted that between 2023 and 2025, the trust has enabled the completion of more than 100 community projects, spanning water supply, electricity, road infrastructure, education, and healthcare with a further 40 projects currently ongoing.
-
News5 days agoDon Savours Inaugural Lecture Presentation, Commends VC
-
News17 hours agoPolice Arrest Nigerian, Two Others For Kidnapping In Edo
-
Business7 hours agoNigeria, AFC sign $1.3 billion deal to build alumina refinery
-
Nation19 hours agoPerm Sec Explains Success Of FGM Elimination Programme In Rivers
-
News17 hours agoNDLEA Arrests Ex-Councillor With 40kg Skunk, Recovers Drugs In Diapers
-
Rivers6 hours agoLGSC Boss Commits To Better Service Delivery
-
Rivers6 hours agoKENPOLY Rector Promises To Prioritise Students’ Welfare
-
Rivers6 hours agoADIAFRICA Flags-off Free Eye Screening Outreach In PH
