Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Strategising For Rivers Electricity Grid

Published

on

It is inexplicable that despite the
abundant sources and resources of energy at Nigeria’s disposal, it is still
difficult for the citizens to enjoy efficient power supply. About seven years,
after the Power Sector Reform Act 2005, we are yet to move to the point of
counting our benefits.

What baffles one most is that despite all
the efforts made by the Federal Government in this regard and the huge amount
sunk into the power sector to revamp it, there is no remarkable improvement. A
total of $16 billion has been poured for 10 years, yet the whole business is
stinking, not much has changed, sounding like a hoax every passing day.

It is the exclusive responsibility of the
federal government to give the people the opportunity to enjoy affordable and
accessible stable electricity. What the nation needs at this time are scores of
compact micro-schemes to deliver power off grid to take the hook off the inept
Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN).

So, as the PHCN is warming up for
privatization before the end of this year, it is pertinent that state
governments and private investors take over the distribution and transmission
of electricity in Nigeria. There are gas, coal and water resources available
for exploit to the advantage of the power sector. Independent Power Projects
(IPP) will enable state governments deliver services that are so critical to
the welfare of the people.

It is high time we began to question the
reasoning behind retaining any monopoly in the value delivery chain which is a
negation of the liberal mantra of the present administration under President
Goodluck Jonathan. The Power Holding Company of Nigeria originally christened
Electricity Corporation of Nigeria (ECN) and later called the National
Electricity Power Authority (NEPA) has outlived its usefulness.

The corporation or organization is not
living up to its bidding both in distribution and transmission, so it is good
enough for privatisation. Current realities show that  transmission suffers the auctioneers hammer.
There is a drastic and constant drop in the power supply ocean. Obviously, not
much has changed in the power scene, the chain remains as unreliable as ever.

The Rivers State Government during a press
conference in Port Harcourt recently called on the Federal Government to
dispose of its distribution aspect to the private sector operators so that they
can run them as business, bring in efficiency and make power available to our
people.

The Commissioner for Power, Hon. Augustine
Wokocha who addressed the conference said: “We are prepared, as a government to
invest into distribution despite  the
fact that it is not part of our responsibility. People are tired of hearing
megawatts, megawatts, they want to see just one watt. The issue of power
distribution is the exclusive property of the Federal Government via the PHCN”.

According to him, the government’s
objective is to provide regular power for the people. “Our driving force is not
to make profit but for our people to make profit for themselves and the
improvement of the economy of the state to be independent and self-sustaining”.
The government, as he puts it, is acting as a catalyst to the industrial and
economic development of the state, noting, however, that it will partner with a
private sector outfit that will buy the generation aspect, of which discussion
is on-going.

The commissioner disclosed that the state
government is strategising itself towards creating own grid in the state such
that “all our generation will be on that grid and the power supply not from
one, generation point. However,  he added
we are conscious of the fact that at the beginning, the demand will jump up, so
we are determined to establish a reasonable capacity and to ensure that other
Nigerians can enjoy what we are doing”.

He explained that for now, the Rivers State
Government has a sharing arrangement with the PHCN to the ratio of 70:30,
pointing out that the governor in 2008 had said that about N22 billion arose
from that agreement for which PHCN has not paid anything and it is running into
N100 billion by now. “The amount is based on what we have generated from the
70:30 formula and given to PHCN”. The government has 70 while PHCN takes 30.

On the way forward, Wokocha explained that
the state is not going to depend on the sharing any more as a modality for
power purchase agreement is being worked out whereby PHCN will buy what the
government is generating and pay for it.

Many states including Rivers State are
anxiously waiting for the whistle to blast for them to invest their resources
in power generation. But it is worthy of note that the situation where states
would invest their hard-earned money in power generation only to have the
output wheeled into the national grid by an arrogant Federal Government is not
encouraging.

Federal Government should allow states move
into the venture of power distribution and transmission if we are to have a
durable framework for captive power generation. From its four gas turbines, the
Rivers State government under the IPP has 180 megawatts of electricity and
hopes to increase if given the free hand.

Today, the Lagos State Government has
delivered the Akute Power Project – a 12 MW Plant dedicated to the state water
corporation with another IPP to deliver 15 MW in two phases to serve the
Central Lagos Business District on course, and many more which are off-grid
underway.

There are reports that limited gas supply
is one of the major challenges facing the eight gas turbines in the country –
NIPP Power Plant, Egbin Power Plant, Olorunsogo Plant, Alaoji Power Plant,
Ihovbor Power Plant, Calabar Power Plant, Gbarain  Power Plant and Omotosho Power Plant. The 304
MGW installed capacity eight gas turbines power plants in the country built and
inaugurated about five years ago have practically packed up and six of them
broken down.

The issue of gas needs in this country is
one that the Federal Government has not given adequate  thought. Until this matter is sorted out and
bound to impact the power sector, the problem of power shortage and outage
would continue to rear its ugly head. The issue of gas supply slow down the
operations of most of the turbines in the country.

In 2010, government’s efforts at improving
power supply got a boost with the commencement of gas supply to the PHCN
facilities. Pan Ocean Oil Corporation (POOC), operator of the NNPC Pan Ocean
Joint Venture commenced supply of gas to the Nigerian Gas Company (NGC) to be
conveyed eventually to PHCN power generating plants. It supplied 50 million
standard cubic feet per day (mmscf/d) of gas to the NGC from its Ovade-Osharefe
gas processing plant.

The flares out directive of the Federal
Government must be adhered to by oil and gas companies. With the gas processing
plants and pipelines which transverse the country, one would think that the
challenge of gas supply is no issue. Oando has so far expended more than N18
billion to develop a 128KM cross-country gas pipeline traversing Akwa Ibom and
Cross River States and has an installed capacity of 100 mmscfd of gas.

The move by the Federal Government
currently to facilitate the supply of gas to companies should be intensified
and implemented to the letter. A team is on a weeklong tour of gas
installations for this purpose. This will go a long way to actualise the hope
that 75 per cent of electricity can come out from natural gas. Nigeria has past
the stage of Kainji and shortage of gas to generate electricity. We have more
than enough gas resources for power generation, so the Federal Government must
be alive to its responsibility by ensuring that sufficient gas is supplied to
power our turbines at all levels.

If the Federal Government means that its
plans for improved power  supply must
come to fruition, it must afford to compromise handing over the power busiess
to investors and be serious about the Power Agenda. It should ensure that
whoever gets the power generation, transmission and distribution assets must be
an investor who has the will-power to improve on it and  not the type that would further resell to
another investor thereafter, thereby compounding the power problem being
suffered by the citizens. The new tariff billed to commence from June 1 should
be put on hold until the power supply improves.

Federal Government investment in power has
not been able to translate into stable power because of lack of accountability
but if the government had done the right thing to design a mechanism to restore
confidence in the power sector, a good result would have been recorded before
now. Statistics show that the power generation target set for 2011 was 5,000
Megawatts, achievement was 4420MW while target for 2012 was 6,000MW but has
crashed to 3200MW resulting in the sacking of some top officials of the PHCN
recently. The uncooperative attitude of some staff of PHCN reveals that there
are major threats to the actualisation of the new power reforms.

To ensure sufficient gas supply for our
power, not just international oil companies should participate in the gas
project of this country but also indigenous firms should be given priority
attention or consideration. Gas to power distribution is a boost the country
badly needs and there must be a corrupt-free national strategy for managing the
gas revenues because the worry about monies generated from the oil ad gas
sector in this country is the ‘course’ of embezzlement and misappropriation. We
must try to avoid the mistakes of the past. Nigeria is a democracy everybody is
watching, so it is expected that there is going to be improvement in the power
sector with the Power Road Map of the present administration. President
Jonathan should exert the political will to actualize the programme.

Our power sector needs a lot of gas, so
there should be concerted efforts to develop our gas resources as never done by
past administrations. Nigeria has large gas resources and so should subsidise
the product for easy reach and domestic consumption. Nigeria is adjudged the
world’s seventh largest producer of high grade gas with zero per cent surplus
and rich in natural gas liquids. It is a universal knowledge that no country
attains the status of industrialization without the impacting influence of
power supply.

 

 

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Resource Wars Are Here and Oil Is the First Casualty

Published

on

In just over a year, the world saw several instances of a choked supply of commodities indispensable for today’s economies and military capabilities.
From China’s restrictions on rare earths and critical minerals supply to the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz, policymakers and analysts began to realize that the control of oil, critical minerals, rare earths, and magnets is as important as building and maintaining stockpiles of advanced weapons. It also became clear that without these resources, defense and military capabilities could be weakened. The actual arms race goes hand in hand with the new battle for the resources that underpin economic, manufacturing, and advanced military development.
“Great-power competition has returned to basics: who controls the physical resources that modern economies and militaries run on,” Alice Gower, a partner at London-based political-risk advisory firm Azure Strategy, told the Wall Street Journal.
“Energy, critical minerals and industrial capacity are leverage, not just economic assets,” Gower added.
The war in the Middle East and the blockage at the Strait of Hormuz laid bare the reality of choked energy supply. The world’s most vital oil and LNG chokepoint, through which 20% of daily global trade flowed before the Iran war, has been essentially closed for most tanker traffic for more than three weeks.
The massive supply shock, the worst disruption in the oil market in history, showed that the world is dependent on energy resources, and that geography and actual physical supply matter. With so much oil and gas stranded in the Middle East, oil prices spiked to above $100 per barrel, natural gas prices in Europe doubled, and Asian spot LNG prices hit multi-year highs.
The precarious situation in the Middle East is reverberating across Asia, the region most dependent on oil and LNG supply from the Persian Gulf. Asian refiners pay sky-high premiums for non-Middle Eastern crude, many are considering cutting or have already cut processing rates, and countries have started to enact fuel-preserving measures, from four-day work weeks to bans on fuel exports.
In Europe, the gas refilling season will be the toughest yet, as Asia is outbidding Europe for spot LNG supply after Qatar’s LNG is effectively sidelined and full capacity may not return for up to five years following Iranian missile attacks last week.
Even the ‘energy independent’ United States, the world’s top oil producer, is not independent when it comes to global supply shocks of such magnitude.
The national average price of gasoline is approaching $4 per gallon nationwide, more than $1 a gallon compared to a month ago, before the start of the war.
Oil is a global resource, traded on a global market, and prices reflect fundamentals, although they have been driven by hectic trading activity on geopolitics in recent weeks. But the fundamentals show that there is no resource available to plug the gap that has opened in Middle Eastern supply. Producers are slashing output due to a lack of storage capacity, which further delays a rapid recovery in supply when this mess ends.
All this goes to show that whoever controls the Strait of Hormuz has enormous leverage on inflicting global economic pain.
While the world is focused on the Strait of Hormuz, the race for rare earths and critical minerals continues, with the U.S. and Western countries scrambling to dent China’s dominance.
Since China restricted exports of rare earth elements early in 2025, Western countries have raced to create mine-to-magnet supply chains to reduce dependence on Chinese supply in the key military and automotive industries.
China holds a 59% share of the mining of rare earths, 91% in refining, and a whopping 94% in magnet manufacturing, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates.
The U.S. has responded by taking stakes in minerals mining companies, the launch of a U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve, known as Project Vault, and is leading efforts to break the Chinese stronghold on the pricing of these minerals critical for the defense and auto industries and national security.
Chinese dominance could be eroded, but it would take years.
Still, rising neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) supply from countries like the U.S. and Australia is set to reduce China’s market share to 69% by 2030 from 90% in 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence (BI) said in new research this month.
“We’re seeing a surge in rare-earth investment as modern technologies demand more critical materials,” said Jack Baxter, Global Metals & Mining Analyst at BI and co-author of the report.
“That said, we anticipate a significant shortfall in supply due to trade uncertainties, with lead times as long as 10 years to get new material out of the ground,” Baxter added.
“This will give pricing power to the few producers that currently are able to supply critical materials outside of China, fracturing the globalized market.”
Amid fractured markets and high geopolitical uncertainty, one thing is certain – the next arms race, alongside the actual arms race, will be for control of key resources such as oil and critical minerals.
By Tsvetana Paraskova
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Transcorp Energy, Renewvia Partner On Renewable Energy Gap

Published

on

Transcorp Energy Limited and Renewvia Solar Nigeria Limited have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly develop renewable energy projects across Nigeria.
The move is aimed at addressing the persistent power deficit that has crumble businesses in the nation.
The agreement also outlines a longer-term plan to expand operations across Africa, positioning both firms to tap into growing demand for clean and reliable electricity.
The partnership would target commercial, industrial and residential consumers, as well as underserved communities, through a mix of off-grid and grid-connected energy solutions.
Beyond electricity provision, the collaboration would explore the aggregation and monetisation of Renewable Energy Credits generated from the projects, adding a commercial layer to the clean energy rollout.
The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Transcorp Energy, Chris Ezeafulukwe, said the initiative aligns with the company’s broader strategy to expand access to sustainable power.
He noted that combining grid and decentralised energy systems would enable the company to deliver reliable electricity directly to end-users across different segments of the economy.
Chief Executive Officer of Renewvia, Trey Jarrard, described Nigeria as a critical market for the company’s African ambitions.
According to him, the partnership provides a platform to scale operations rapidly by leveraging established infrastructure and local expertise, while delivering cost-effective and resilient energy solutions.
Both companies said the agreement lays the foundation for a scalable pan-African renewable energy business, capable of supporting diverse markets and accelerating the continent’s transition to cleaner power sources.
The collaboration comes amid increasing pressure on governments and private sector players to deploy sustainable energy solutions to bridge electricity gaps, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and support economic growth across Africa.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

IYC Tasks Niger Delta Governors On  Oil Field Bidding  ….Decries Exclusion of Host Communities

Published

on

The Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide has raised concerns over the continued exclusion of host communities from the governance of oil resources, urging Niger Delta governors to take decisive steps by bidding for oil blocs and marginal fields.
The council warned that failure to act would allow external interests to continue dominating the region’s oil assets, despite their location within host communities.
Secretary-General of the council, Maobuye Nangi-Obu, started this at the stakeholders’ meeting organised by the Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited , with participants drawn from Rivers, Abia and Imo States, in Port Harcourt, recently.
“It is time for state governments in the Niger Delta, especially Rivers State, to form oil companies that can bid for marginal fields within their territories”, he said.
Nangi-Obu expressed concern over the reported listing of about 25 marginal oil fields for allocation, noting that many were located in host communities but allegedly being assigned to non-indigenes.
In his words “They sit in Abuja and decide what happens in our region, yet we are not part of the oil governance of our own resources”.
He explained that marginal fields, though considered uneconomical by major oil firms, remain viable for indigenous operators, adding that their allocation had continued to fuel grievances in the Niger Delta.
The IYC scribe also warned of the implications of directional drilling, describing it as a growing threat to host communities.
“There could be oil wells in your community, and somebody elsewhere could be drilling that oil without your knowledge,” he cautioned.
On environmental concerns, Nangi-Obu condemned the persistent gas flaring in the region, blaming both international and local operators for failing to invest in gas processing infrastructure.
He, however, commended Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited for its engagement with host communities.
“Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited is doing the right thing by engaging stakeholders. Not all companies are doing what they are doing,” he stated.
Traditional rulers at the meeting, further acknowledged improvements linked to the company’s activities in their areas.
The Eze Ekpeye-Logbo, King Kevin Anugwo, represented by Dr Patricia Ogbonnaya, noted that “aquatic life that disappeared due to pollution is gradually returning,” attributing the development to improved environmental conditions.
Similarly, Chairman of the K-Dere Council of Chiefs, Chief Batom Mitee, said, “There is now peace in our community,” stressing,  increased oil production must translate into tangible benefits for host communities.
By: King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Trending