Editorial
The Hepatitis Scourge
The world marked the 2010 World Hepatitis Day, recently and as has been the practice, it afforded medical experts an opportunity to raise global awareness on the nature of hepatitis, particularly its prevention, diagnosis and treatment.
World Hepatitis Alliance (WHA), a global interventionist group of professionals united in the struggle to check the mortality caused by this killer health condition, says while about 170 million people worldwide have hepatitis B or hepatitis C, approximately 1.5 million people die every year from either of the two viruses.
According to this group of experts, one out of every 12 persons lives with either hepatitis B or hepatitis C globally, making the disease a more common health problem than HIV/AIDS or any form of cancer. It is, indeed, for this singular statistic that the 2008 World Hepatitis Day campaign slogan, ‘Am I Number 12?’ still remains relevant.
Bringing the figures closer home, another group of experts which addressed newsmen on the eve of this year’s celebration, the Society for Gastroenterology and Herpetology of Nigeria (SOGIll1\T), estimates that about 20 million people in Nigeria are infected with hepatitis, out of which five million are on the verge of dying due to late diagnosis.
Hepatitis is an inflammation of the liver resulting in soreness and swelling. Physicians refer to inflammations that last for less than six months as acute hepatitis while those that last longer than six months are known as chronic hepatitis.
Some of the common causes of hepatitis include excessive drinking of alcohol, obesity, poison, inadequate blood supply to the liver, injury to the liver, taking of herbal mixtures and other self-administered medication.
In the event that anyone of hepatitis B or C is left untreated or unmanaged, it can lead to advanced liver scarring (cirrhosis) and other complications which may include liver cancer, liver failure and eventual death.
·While it is true that liver reacts in different ways depending on the cause and duration of its infection, some common symptoms of hepatitis have been said to include jaundice (yellow colouring of the skin and eyes), fatigue, fever, nausea and vomiting.
Experts have also described hepatitis Band C as silent killer viruses. This is because people can live with these viruses for many years without a manifestation of the symptoms, a condition described as asymptomatic. Again, the situation becomes even trickier as a good number of the symptoms are also common to other ailments and, as such, people are wont to ignore them or wrongly attribute such to any less harmful infection.
While hepatitis B which traces can be found in all major body fluids of infected persons, including blood, saliva, urine, sweat, tears, semen and vaginal fluid, is amenable to prevention through vaccination, there is no known vaccine, as yet, for hepatitis C even though doctors say an effective treatment option exists for infected persons.
The Tide is, however, worried that apart from what medical experts read out to their audiences on World Hepatitis Days, not much is being achieved in the campaign to raise and sustain awareness concerning the hepatitis scourge in Nigeria. It is apparently for this reason that the general HIV/AIDS awareness level has consistently overreached that of hepatitis, even when the two viral infections are known to be equally deadly.
We believe that it is now time for the federal, state and local governments, while working in tandem with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and other international health agencies, to step up the hepatitis awareness campaign, especially in the rural communities.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics2 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics2 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
