Opinion
FG’s Amnesty: Hopes And Uncertainty
Okere Chimezie
From June, 2009 to date, the media have been awash with an array of opinions and views concerning the Federal Government’s amnesty offer to Niger Delta militants. What exactly it means, its importance, success and perhaps failures.
This period is a period of grace and pardon to insurgents who repent from their actions and surrender arms to the Federal Government within the stipulated time, say two months, within which such persons would have nothing against them in relation to their past activities.
The deadline for Federal Government’s amnesty offer ended 12 midnight Sunday, 4 October, 2009. After that date, fanatics maintain that it would remain business as usual. Maybe the more readily determined to combat crime by federal government, the more offensive the insurgence.
Between the duo, the ordinary man is locked opinion wise to discern who actually pardons who. This is evident in Federal Government amnesty offer to militant.
In view of the foregoing, it is not wrong to say that as much as parents have the responsibility to pardon their children whenever they err, so do children have the audacity to forgive their erring parents. As humans, we are bound to err, but it takes divinity to forgive.
But then, are these militants naturally cantankerous? No I say with all conviction. As history reveals that Niger Deltans, especially the Ijaws are naturally endowed with means of survival rather than being offensive to others.
Evidently, the armed struggle to fight and live by the present Niger Delta agitators, may not be unconnected to the prophecy of one of the earliest agitators of Niger Delta, Isaac Adaka Boro. In his posthumously published book The Twelve-Day Revolution, Isaac Boro held that the need to have a Niger Delta State created out of what we had then presents a logical case owing to the peoples’ distinct history.
He then furthers his demand for the creation of Niger Delta in view of the peoples’ viability. In what would have been an act of militancy, by today’s definition, he declared that “if Nigerian government refuses to do something to drastically improve the lot of the people, certainly a point of no return would be reached; them evil is a foot.”
As Isaac Boro was not the only voice as at his time, there were others who approached the issue in a more ‘gentlemanly’ manner like T.N. Paul Birabi, Melford Okilo, Chief Harold Dappa-Biriye and other champions of Niger Delta freedom?
Ironically, the reason behind government’s outrageous refusal to the demands of Niger Delta people more than half a century ago was Ipso facto, that we then had an economy that was a little bit diversified. If not for oil, other sectors could serve. With the advent of mono-economy now in place, no oil, no economy, no revenue, and no allocation. What a sorry state!
In the crisis rocking Nigeria’s only deltaic region, the role of the seven-sister ol companies – who claim to have come to develop Nigeria, but must on condition write the agreement for landlords to sign – are left out in the whole matrix.
According to Civil Liberty Organisation (CLO), Shell for instance, is particularly mentioned. In petition number 1467, Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP), at the Port Harcourt sitting of the Pout Panel, adduced evidence that Shell set Ogonis against one another and instigated the government to crush Ogoni resistance to Shell’s method of doing business.
Though Shell denied the allegations, but admitted it bought 107 berretta pistols for use by Police assigned to guard its property against criminal action 23 years ago.
In February 2000, 27 communities in Bayelsa alone accused Shell of fueling crisis among them.
In the meantime, militancy, kidnapping and other social vices are not the best option to resolving the crisis or have demands heeded to. Neither would militarizing Niger Delta hold water. The demand for 100 per cent resource control as a condition to seize-fire is good, but not the summon bonum, as enjoying what we have alone, and become obsessed will not best define us a distinct people.
Nevertheless, ammon avis is for the majority tribes to accept the realities of the nation’s diversities and operate true federalism, by seeing that at least 50 per cent derivation formula is approved.
If true, the statement credited to Dr. Atuboyedia Ibianeme, the INC President by the media that Federal Government amnesty was a display of executive arrogance, which means there is a war of wit between the government and militants concerning amnesty. The I should not be seen as unpatriotic fellow if imminent failure of amnesty programme is extrapolated.
But then, as the people keep faith in God to see an end of the crisis one day, militants and Federal troops should have the axiom that, where two elephants fight, it’s the grass that bears the brunt. He who fights and runs must certainly come back to fight.
In the words of John F. Kennedy, “If a man refuses to put an end to violence, violence will put an end to man”.
Chimezie is of the Dept. of Mass Comm, RSUST PH.
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Sports5 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports5 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports5 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports5 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports5 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports5 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports5 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics5 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension