Connect with us

Politics

2015:How Prepared Is INEC?

Published

on

Post-election disputes
have been a serious challenge to Nigeria’s electoral system and indeed a shackle on the nation’s development.
Most of the military interventions Nigeria had witnessed were not unconnected with post-election disputes arising from election rigging and other sundry irregularities, as was the case with 1964 and 1983 general elections.
Save for the annulled June 12, 1993 presidential election won by the late business mogul, Chief M.K.O. Abiola, and which was adjudged the freest and fairest in Nigeria’s electoral history, Nigeria has had the chequered history of conducting questionable elections.
In the last 14 years since Nigeria returned to democratic path, the country had conducted four general elections. Each of them reeked of fraud. The fairest of them which was the 2011 general elections was not spared of some  irregularities either.
The 2007 general elections conducted by Prof. Maurice Iwu led Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) were particularly a rape of democracy. The highest beneficiary of the election, late President Umar Yar’Adua acknowledged the electoral fraud and quickly inaugurated an Electoral Reform Committee (ERC) headed by Justice Muhammed Uwais (rtd) to review the elections, the nation’s electoral law, and make recommendations on how to improve on future elections.
Unfortunately, there was little progress in the adoption of ERC’s reports before Yar’Adua died in 2009. As soon as Yar’Adua’s successor, Jonathan took the driver’s seat as the Acting President, he announced his support for the ERC’s recommendations and eventually sent them to the National Assembly for onward review and adoption. Notwithstanding the series of delay suffered by the amendment, the electoral act review scaled the legislative hurdles after the harmonised version of the act was voted on, on July 30, 2010 by the Senate.
In spite of the success recorded by the Electoral Act 2010, many people believe it is not yet Uhuru for Nigeria’s electoral system. It is against this background that INEC reviewed the act and made some recommendations to the National Assembly after the 2011 general elections.
The INEC chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega said the commission had reviewed the existing Electoral Act since after the 2011 general elections, and had passed its recommendations to the National Assembly on the need for amendment. This, according to the INEC boss, is to improve on the legal framework for the 2015 general elections to be conducted by the commission.
“There is very likely going to be an amendment to the existing Electoral Act. As a commission, we have reviewed the existing Electoral Act since after the 2011 general elections and we have made recommendations to the National Assembly on the need to make certain amendments in order to improve the legal framework for the elections,” Jega said.
Some of the INEC’s recommendations to the National Assembly include those bordering on its operational independence, the electronic voting and being at the forefront of the establishment of an Electoral Offences Tribunal or Electoral Offences Commission.
Although nobody, including the INEC, is sure of when the amendment would be done, there are indications that the National Assembly is committed to amend the existing Electoral Act within a sufficient time for INEC to be able to fathom it into its preparations for the 2015 elections.
Penultimate week, the Senate began some far-reaching moves to amend the electoral act. The moves were in line with the recommendations of the Senate Committee on Review of the 1999 Constitution led by the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu.
Among the recommendations of the committee include, the proposal to transfer the powers to appoint the INEC secretary on renewable four year tenure from the INEC chairman to the President, lifting of embargo on electronic voting system, transfer of powers to fix and sequence election dates from the INEC to the National Assembly, extension of the conduct of governorship and presidential run-off elections from seven to 21 days, and empowerment of the INEC to de-register any political party which fails to win a seat from local government to presidential elections.
Other proposals include the conferment of the exclusive jurisdiction to try offences relating to violation of the Electoral Act on the Federal High court, and a proposal to mandate the clerks of the National Assembly and state houses of assembly to notify INEC in writing of the existence of vacant seats in the legislature, arising from death, resignation or vacation of such seats within seven days of such vacancies.
Although, all the amendments proposed by Ekweremadu’s committee had already passed their second reading in the Senate, most of them had generated heated debate and controversy.
For instance, the proposal to transfer the power to fix and sequence election dates from the electoral body to the federal legislature was described as very curious and self-serving. Political analysts punctured the arguments put forward by the proponents of the amendment that, resting such powers on the INEC amounts to relinquishing the fate of Nigeria’s democracy on the INEC chairman. According to them, the legislature cannot be an umpire in an election in which it is a participant.
Another area of contention is the proposal to adopt electronic voting for the 2015 elections.
A constitutional lawyer cum politician, Mr Jimi Agbaje said, “if there is one thing that we need to get right, if it is possible, that would have a multiplier effect on the rest, it is this electronic voting process. If we can get this right, the tendency is that it would reduce rigging and this idea of people sitting down in one room and writing results.”
Agbaje who was speaking as a guest on Channels Television’s ‘Politics Today,’ last Sunday, added that electronic voting would “also help good governance in absolute terms because if a politician knows that it is the voters that matter in the electoral process, they will respect the ballot box.”
He was, however, quick to add that Nigeria was not ready for electronic voting. He said there were many things that would need to be put in place for electronic voting system to work in Nigeria.
According to him, Nigerians would need to believe in the system for it to work, while INEC would need to convince Nigerians that the electronic voting would be fraud proof before embracing it.
There are also palpable fears among Nigerians that deploying electronic voting at this time when general elections are just nine months away is capable of undermining the 2015 general elections.  While Nigerians are not oblivious of the global trend towards e-voting system, they are apprehensive about the workability and effectiveness of the system in a country where electricity is still in short supply and internet facilities are insufficient. For successful e-voting system in the country, therefore, many people believe more time will be required to properly condition he polity for its usage.
The INEC’s Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Mr Olumide Osaze-Uzzi shares this view when he said the commission was not insisting on the use of e-voting for the 2015 elections. He said the INEC was only requesting for it to be allowed to commence the process whereby foundations are laid for the exercise to be able to take off soon.
There is no doubt that the plan to review the existing electoral act is aimed at strengthening the electoral system in the country. But while the nation is waiting for the Senate to consider most of these proposed amendments, it is also imperative for the INEC to raise its game.
According to Agbaje, any form of amendment being proposed for the Electoral Act would be coming against the background of how much INEC can do.
At every forum, the INEC chairman has repeatedly assured Nigerians of better elections in 2015, but given the sharp contrast between 2012 governorship election in Edo State which gave Nigerians a ray of hope and the subsequent November 16, 2013 gubernatorial election in Anambra State which produced disastrous results and also eroded the confidence of Nigerians in the electoral body, the question is, how prepared is Jega’s INEC?

 
Boye Salau

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo As Spokesperson

Published

on

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential hopeful for 2027, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has named actor and politician, Mr Kenneth Okonkwo, as his spokesperson.

Mr Okonkwo made the announcement on his X (formerly Twitter) account on yesterday, expressing gratitude for what he called Alhaji Abubakar’s show of faith in him.

“I give God all the glory for being appointed by His Excellency Atiku Abubakar as his spokesperson. I thank His Excellency for the immense confidence reposed in me,” Mr Okonkwo said.

The politician credited Alhaji Abubakar with championing dialogue over conflict within party ranks.

He noted that the former vice president favours conversation and compromise when party associates raise genuine worries, rather than dismissing their concerns.

“Rather than take offence at associates for expressing genuine reservations about any action taken, His Excellency always opts for dialogue and compromise that engender solutions to problems,” Mr Okonkwo stated.

According to him, recent talks with Alhaji Abubakar and other ADC leaders tackled worries about South-East political representation within the limits of the Electoral Act, 2026, and the current political climate. He said the discussions produced guarantees for the region’s interests despite existing constraints.

Mr Okonkwo also acknowledged the work of Dr. Kashim Imam; former ADC National Chairman, Ralphs Nwosu; Ekene Onwuka, Alhaji Abubakar’s Senior Special Assistant on Special Duties, in preparing the party for next year’s elections. He thanked his loved ones and supporters for their support and prayers.

“I still covet your prayers for wisdom, courage, provision and protection needed to carry out this challenging responsibility, which will usher in a glorious and great Nigeria,” he added.

The appointment arrives weeks after Mr Okonkwo publicly attacked the ADC’s pick for running mate in 2027. He’d warned that choosing a vice-presidential candidate from the South-South would worsen what he sees as political neglect of the South-East, a region without a president or vice president since 1999.

Despite Mr Okonkwo’s objections, the ADC later announced former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation, Mr Rotimi Amaechi, as Alhaji Abubakar’s running mate following the ex-vice president’s clinching of the party’s presidential nomination.

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill

Published

on

The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.

The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.

In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”

 

The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.

He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.

According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.

Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.

He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.

“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.

The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.

According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.

Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.

“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.

“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.

He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.

Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.

“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

News

Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas

Published

on

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.

 

The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.

 

In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.

 

The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.

 

SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.

 

It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.

 

“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.

 

It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).

 

“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.

 

“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.

 

“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”

 

SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.

“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”

 

Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.

 

For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.

 

“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”

 

Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.

 

SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.

 

It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.

 

The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.

 

SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.

 

It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.

 

It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.

 

The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.

Continue Reading

Trending