Connect with us

Opinion

Moving In To New Frontiers

Published

on

Moving into new frontiers” was the resolution of half a dozen white sugar plantation owners in America many centuries ago, as they rose from a meeting on finding “appropriate and resilient labour” for their farms. The result of that resolution was the rise of Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, and the “new frontiers” to exploit included the coasts of West Africa for “Negro labour”. Resident labour-force!
It is interesting that “moving into new frontiers” is featuring again in Nigeria’s economic history, with regards to exploration of oil and gas reserves. The Tide newspaper (Wednesday, March 29, 2023) had a front-page headline news: “FG Targets 50bn Barrels Oil Reserve in Nassarawa”. We are told that President Muhammadu Buhari flagged off the first drill for oil in Nassarawa State, with the country hoping to raise its oil reserves to 50 billion barrels in the next decade.
The news report went on to say that Nigeria’s oil serves currently stands at 37.8 billion barrels. The flag off of oil drilling occasion was the Spud-in of Ebenyi-A Oil Well in Ajibu, Obi Local Government Area of Nassarawa State. President Buhari was quoted as saying that the government was determined to boost Nigeria’s oil production capacity by moving into new frontiers. We are told that the drilling for oil in the Benue Trough “is in line with the ongoing campaign for the exploration of crude oil and gas in the nation’s frontier basins…” Other frontiers include Chad Basin, Dahomey, Sokoto, Bida Basins, etc.
It is noteworthy that the Petroleum Industry Act (2022) made provision for 30 per cent of annual allocation of oil profit for exploration of oil and gas resources in Northern Nigeria. It is also noteworthy that the politics of oil and gas resources included making the oil and gas resources of the people of the Niger Delta zone into national assets through various policies. With the PIA and privatization of NNPCL, oil and gas resources in Nigeria are in the hands of private entities. Who are the oil barons?
The Nigeria Civil War (1967-1970) provided opportunity for privatisation of resources of the Niger Delta people; a process which placed ownership of 83 percent of all oil blocks in the hands of Northern Nigerians. Thanks to Senator Ita Enang for providing the details. It is also noteworthy that agitations for resource control by sections of the people who felt that they were seriously short-changed, were suppressed through various clever ways. What has become clear in the oil and gas resources politics is the fact that Nigeria’s political-economy has taken a definite shape in the past 40 years. Exploitation!
When a few powerful American sugar farmers made the resolution of “moving into new frontiers” many centuries ago, the results included an unfair exploitation of the labour of Negro slaves. Apart from numerous disruptions and agonies caused by Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, the slave culture has left its impacts in every aspects of human economic activities. Modern forms of slavery are quite numerous, with experience of the Ekweremadus in the U. K. providing plenty issues to think or write about. Modern slavery involves not only unfair exploitation of the weak by the strong, but largely gross abuses of personal trust and integrity.
Raphael Pepple deserves to be congratulated for his insightful article on the Ekweremadu experience in the United Kingdom with regards to Modern Slavery Act 2015 of the U.K. Not only is Nigeria now classified as a nation of organ traffickers, but also “ranked fourth among the top ten countries in the world with the highest number of slaves” – ref. The Tide, Wed. March 29, 2023. Raphael Pepple went on to tell us that “in a global ranking of modern day slavery of 167 countries, Nigeria ranked fourth … with a total of 1,386,000 slaves”. They include house-help, child labour, abuses!
How the Global Slavery Index (GSI) came by the verdict on Nigeria and other countries which include India, China and North Korea, in 2018, is not the key issue here. Rather, the sad image which Nigeria has continued to have in the global community should be of serious concern to all patriotic Nigerians. More worrisome is the fact that Nigerian elite constitute the class that portray the nation in the worst light. Was Mr Pepple wrong to say that “politicians in the top echelon of the political value chain of our country loot our commonwealth, launder it, and boost the economy of other countries”?
Nigeria’s sad image in the global community arose largely from two factors: easy money coming from oil and gas resources, and gangsterist attitude fostered by trafficking in hard drugs. Long before the Gloria Okon saga and the death of Dele Giwa, hard drug business had been going on among some smart Nigerians. Most of those involved constituted themselves into an invincible cult groups.
The slogan of moving into new frontiers also became popular at the end of the Nigeria Civil War, when a large number of the “strong men” were demobilised and had to find alternative means of earning a living. It would be recalled that cases of armed robbery and other violent crimes became alarming from 1970, despite introduction of capital punishment. It may also be recalled that some convicted persons on death roll made some off-record remarks about “kings and barons of the crime world enjoying class immunity, while insignificant apprentices are condemned to death”.
Nigerian authorities have been told several times that the nation’s reward system is grossly faulty and that unearned and easy wealth often lead to the decay of a nation. We have been told that behind every great wealth, there is usually a crime. We may not know how Nigerian “money bags” came by their enormous wealth, but we do know that money is a decisive factor in Nigeria’s politics. We are also aware that Nigeria’s oil- producing communities have been marginalised and short-changed grossly in a political economy that throws justice to the wind. Can there be peace without justice?
The new nation’s frontier basins in the oil and gas economy constitute a new phase in the oil and gas politics. What should be noted is that the culture of “robbing Peter to pay Paul” should not begin and end with the Niger-Delta Frontier alone. Let the same rule apply to the new frontier oil-producing communities.

By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending