Politics
Challenges Before Election Petition Tribunals
The April 2011 general elections have come and gone with the good people of Rivers State looking forward to a successful inauguration of Governor Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi on May 29.
The political and electoral ripples from the elections are yet to settle down as opposition political parties’ candidates are challenging and ventilating their electoral grievances over the unsatisfactory conduct and outcome of the April general elections before Election Petition Tribunals in the state.
However, defeated candidates of the opposition political parties are challenging the declaration of the (PDP) candidates declared winners in the April 9th National Assembly Election and April 26th Governorship/House of Assembly elections.
On the Governorship, four opposition political parties candidates of All Grand Progressive Alliance (APGA), Sir Celestine Omehia, Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) Dr. Abiye Sekibo, Action Alliance (AA) Chief Hon. Aleruchi William, and African Political System (APS) Chief Hon. Felix Amadi are challenging the election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi of the PDP.
In Election Petition No. EPT/Gov./PH/27/2011 filed by legal counsel C.O. Ejezie Esq. of J.C. Ezike & Co. c/o Omehia & Associates 2A Ikwerre Road for Sir Celestine Omehia & APGA as Petitioners against Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi and three others as respondents, APGA and its candidate’s grounds for their Petition are that contrary to S.182 (1) (g) of the 1999 (CFRN) & the Electoral Act S.138 (a) 2010 as amended, the first and second respondents being Governor Amaechi & Deputy Governor Tele Ikuru are not qualified being persons employed in the public service of Rivers State and therefore did not resign or withdraw or retire from the said employment thirty days to the date of the Governorship election held on April 26th, 2011.
Secondly, that by Provison of the S.138 (b) (c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended, that the election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi is invalid by reason of corrupt practices or non compliance with the provision of this Act and that the 1st and 2nd respondents were not duly elected by majority of lawful votes cast at the election.
In Election petition No. EPT/GOV/PH/21/2011 filed by G.O. Tamuno Esq. for Dr. Abiye Sekibo and ACN as the petitioners against election of Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi, PDP and INEC as respondents, are challenging the Election based on S. 138 (b) & (c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.
Dr. Abiye Sekibo further averred that there were widespread irregularities and malpractices that substantially affected the outcome of the election in his favour, coupled with the fact that Ad-hoc staff of INEC were substituted for supporters of the respondents.
In the election petitions No. EPT/GOV/PH/37/2011, Chief Hon. Felix Amadi, candidate of the African Political System (APS) filed by Ahameke Ejelam Esq. of Principles law Partnership and Chief Hon. Aleruchi William, candidate of Action Alliance in Election Petition No. EPT/GOV/PH/39/2011, filed by M.N. Nnamani Esq c/o St. Michael Solicitors, they are separately challenging their unlawful exclusion from the Governorship Election of April 26th in the State in accordance with S. 138 (d) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.
Chief Hon. Felix Amadi and Chief Hon. Alurechi Williams and their political parties respectively are seeking for the nullification of the April 26th Governorship election by reason of unlawful exclusion, an order for bye-election or re-run, or fresh Governorship election, an order canceling or withdrawing the certificate of Return issued to the Governor-elect and an order restraining the Governor-elect from being sworn in or acting as Governor or performing the functions of Governor of Rivers State.
Awanen Jas Esq, legal practitioner said, “the Petitioners having presented their petitions and grounds of the facts of the petition, the legal fireworks have started and behold their respected Justices of the Tribunal are to sip through the facts and arrive at their findings”.
However, Rivers State like other states of the Federation has two Election Petition Tribunals. The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal and the National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal.
The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal was formally inaugurated on Friday, 20th May 2011 in High Court 16 Port Harcourt with Justice (Mrs) A.A. Wambai (Chairman), Justice O.N. Anyachelelu and Justice A.B. Abdul Kareem as members.
Justice A.A. Wambai promised that the tribunal shall be transparent and honest in all their dealings and advised counsel to always conduct themselves with utmost decorum while appearing before the tribunal without unnecessary delay.
Prior to the formal inauguration in Port Harcourt, having been sworn in, in Abuja, the Assistant Secretary of the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal in Rivers Abubakar Mohammed, said that the Tribunal had entertained two Ex Parte Motions brought by two defeated Governorship candidates in the state and the Ex parte motions were granted for the inspection of the Electoral materials used by the INEC for the April 26th Governorship Election in the state.
Mr. Sulieman, Assistant Secretary, National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal said “that the Tribunal is yet to be inaugurated in Port Harcourt and therefore the names of the Tribunal chairman and members are not yet available”.
Mr. Sulieman further said that in accordance with S.285 (5) of the 1999 Constitution as amended for election Petition to be filed within 21 days after the date of declaration of result of the election, the National/State Assembly Election Petition Tribunal in the State received (9) nine House of Representatives and five Senate Election Petitions, challenging the winners of the Elections of the National Assembly conducted on 9th April 2011. while out of the 32 seats in the state Assembly, election of 22 members are being challenged before the Tribunal with only 10 members having their election not being challenged.
Meanwhile, Emmanuel C. Ukala (SAN) Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) section on Legal Practice said “Election Petitions are regarded in law as “Sui generis” in nature, meaning they are neither civil proceedings nor criminal proceedings strict sensu but are rather in a class of their own with special regulator regimes which requires strict compliance”.
The Tribunals are generally ad-hoc in nature and are to be constituted not later than 14 days before the election and when constituted, open their registries for business 7 days before the election per section 133 (2) (a) & (b) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.
In view of the past controversies that had trailed several Election Petition Tribunals and their judgements, members of the various Election Petition Tribunals have been enjoined to ensure transparency in the midst of the mounting challenges.
Awanen Jas Esq., legal practitioner, said Justices of the Election Petition Tribunals should hold high the integrity of the bench by discharging their responsibilities in a way, that will restore confidence and credibility to the Judiciary.
Abbiye Suku Esq., legal practitioner based in Port Harcourt and a law lecturer, said justices of the various Election Petition Tribunals should ensure that judgements are dispensed with a sense of justice.
They must work within the limit of the timelines to ensure justice is done without unnecessary legal technicalities by counsel.
However, members of the tribunal must ensure that Justice is not only seen to be done but must be done based on facts by the petitioners and Respondents, only then can the Judiciary be the last hope of the common man to restore confidence in the Electoral processes.
Philip-Wuwu Okparaji
Politics
Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo As Spokesperson
Mr Okonkwo made the announcement on his X (formerly Twitter) account on yesterday, expressing gratitude for what he called Alhaji Abubakar’s show of faith in him.
“I give God all the glory for being appointed by His Excellency Atiku Abubakar as his spokesperson. I thank His Excellency for the immense confidence reposed in me,” Mr Okonkwo said.
The politician credited Alhaji Abubakar with championing dialogue over conflict within party ranks.
He noted that the former vice president favours conversation and compromise when party associates raise genuine worries, rather than dismissing their concerns.
“Rather than take offence at associates for expressing genuine reservations about any action taken, His Excellency always opts for dialogue and compromise that engender solutions to problems,” Mr Okonkwo stated.
According to him, recent talks with Alhaji Abubakar and other ADC leaders tackled worries about South-East political representation within the limits of the Electoral Act, 2026, and the current political climate. He said the discussions produced guarantees for the region’s interests despite existing constraints.
Mr Okonkwo also acknowledged the work of Dr. Kashim Imam; former ADC National Chairman, Ralphs Nwosu; Ekene Onwuka, Alhaji Abubakar’s Senior Special Assistant on Special Duties, in preparing the party for next year’s elections. He thanked his loved ones and supporters for their support and prayers.
“I still covet your prayers for wisdom, courage, provision and protection needed to carry out this challenging responsibility, which will usher in a glorious and great Nigeria,” he added.
The appointment arrives weeks after Mr Okonkwo publicly attacked the ADC’s pick for running mate in 2027. He’d warned that choosing a vice-presidential candidate from the South-South would worsen what he sees as political neglect of the South-East, a region without a president or vice president since 1999.
Despite Mr Okonkwo’s objections, the ADC later announced former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation, Mr Rotimi Amaechi, as Alhaji Abubakar’s running mate following the ex-vice president’s clinching of the party’s presidential nomination.
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
-
News1 day agoFamily Seeks Police Help As Woman Goes Missing After Fleeing Female Circumcision Threat
-
News1 day agoNigeria Hosts World Public Relations Forum Sept …As Experts Seek Inclusion Of PR In Decision Making
-
News1 day agoUphold Principles Of Dev, Rivers SSG Charges Tertiary Institutions
-
News1 day agoTinubu, Fubara Condole Amaechi Over Mother’s Death
-
News1 day agoNDLEA Intercepts 1.63m Tramadol Pills, Arrests 80-Year-Old Suspect
-
Oil & Energy1 day agoFG Urges Against Operators’ Actions That Could Distabilise Market
-
News1 day agoFG Alerts Nigerians Of N50,000 Allowance Registration Scam
-
News2 days agoSpain Are World Champions ….. End Argentina, Messi’s Dreams
