Opinion
Kidnapping: Any Hope For An End?
Kidnapping is now the talk of the town. It is a criminal offence which is the unlawful taking and carrying away of a person by force or detention of a person against their will. Recently, kidnapping for the purpose of extortion has become a tactic of political revolutionaries or terrorists seeking concession from a government.
In earlier times kidnapping meant carrying persons away to another country for involuntary servitude. It also referred to the practices of conscripting males into military service by fraudulent inducement or force and of shanghaiing merchant seamen in port cities.
Abducting young women and selling them for purpose of concubinage or prostitution has also been characterized as a form of kidnapping. In current statuses, this is often described as abduction.
Frequent acts of violent crimes have grown to form a major threat to Nigeria’s national security. These include militancy, insurgency and banditry. Kidnapping has remained the most virulent form of banditry in Nigeria. It has become the most pervasive and intractable violent crime in the country.
Kidnapping can be targeted at individuals or groups. It has led to the loss of thousands of lives and huge sums of money in Rivers State and elsewhere. Many victims of the crime have been killed in the course of their abduction, custody or release, and many more have been injured. This is in addition to huge sums of money lost to ransom takers over the victims and their families. The consequences are frightful.
Rivers State should never have got here in the first place. Kidnapping has become one of the most dangerous and traumatic threats to any person living within the State. Each kidnapping incident is a direct attack on the hearts of families, companies, individuals and causes a significant impact on society in general. This greatly disrupts the family routine, social interactions and the employment capabilities of some families.
Several factors have been identified for kidnapping among Nigerian youths. Some include social and moral decadence, peer group influence, drug abuse, mass media , ethnic nationalism, ethnic militia, godfatherism, elites, economy, population and family influence, among others.
This crime is a growing global epidemic with no real solution. It, therefore, has attracted the attention of different fields of study. Sociologists, social psychologists, clinical psychologists, social workers, philosophers and economists have begun to research into the causes and consequences of kidnapping because it is one of the most psychologically damaging crimes.
Victims typically take many years to heal from the psychological wounds inflicted upon them and some never completely recover. Kidnapping causes deep emotional and mental scars that leave victims to battle through issues of trust, independence, love, sex, respect and a litany of others.
Furthermore, kidnap victims may have psychological disturbances in other aspects of their everyday lives. Trouble-sleeping is one of the most commonly reported psychological impacts of kidnapping as the victims are afraid to fall asleep and let their guard down, lest be taken again.
Sexual defects are also likely in cases of kidnapping that involves sexual abuse. Survivors may find it hard to trust their partners or to allow themselves to be vulnerable. Victims of abduction may need many years of therapy to form healthy sexual relationships.
There are many causes of kidnapping around the globe which include: unemployment, poverty, illiteracy, religion, greed, politics and corruption.
The possible ways of eradicating kidnapping it include training anti-kidnapping agents because any country that wants to fight kidnapping successfully must hire and train capable agents to combat the issue. When law enforcement agencies are actively involved, the incident will lessen.
There should be serious punishment for offenders and fewer abductions will occur. Also, more job opportunities should be created because “the idle mind is the devil’s workshop”. Jobs, especially for the youths, can have a huge impact in the fight against crime. When people are gainfully employed, they do not need to commit crime.
Reports show that the police are involved in some kidnappings. This is unfortunate. They have to be monitored to eliminate the criminals within their ranks.
Harry is a Port Harcourt-based freelance journalist.
Favour Harry
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
