Opinion
Honour Among Thieves
It is obvious that corruption can take various shapes and guises, one of which is what can arise from the sharing of booties and loots among honourable thieves. Armed robbers have been known to confess that the amount of money said to have been recovered from them was far less than what they stole when the police caught them. Similarly, senior bank officials have been known to declare far more money as carted away by robbers than the actual amount stolen away.
In various establishments and institutions in the public sector, internal accounting for “Off Record Expenditures” and departmental imprests, have been known to expose a lot of malpractices. What can be listed discreetly as off-record-expenditure (ORE) can include some money paid to “rain makers to hold the rain during official ceremonies”. For example, there was a case of N2.5 million purportedly spent on “Marabout hired from Sudan for exorcism”.
Tertiary institutions of education are particularly notorious for “off record expenditure on rain-makers to hold the rain during convocation ceremonies.” There are also such monetary matters which it would be impolite to state in explicit terms the actual purposes of what the expenditures were made. For example, the retirement of imprests can be such abbreviations as “MBW” which can mean expenditures on lechery and lewd activities.
There can be internal or departmental monetary matters which can generate such controversies and scandals that in-house panel of inquiry can be set up to “look into the matter”. It was through one of such panel of inquiry that it became known that “MBW” was a colloquial item for “man body is not wood”. That was lechery! What led to acrimony and threats of impeachment was the fact that one “greedy man decided to eat alone what would have been shared among colleagues”.
Inquiries into such malfeasance can also throw some light into possible causes or origins of some cases of assassination, kidnapping and armed robbery attacks. Sharing of booties and loots which end in gross dissatisfaction and acrimony among thieves often result in those who feel short-changed wanting to take some revenge. It is common to hear aggrieved persons make such comments as: “there are many ways to kill a rat”.
Setting up of in-house panel of inquiry to look into “misappropriation of funds” also brings its own dangers. There are cases where those who agree to serve in such panels of inquiry become victims of some vicious attacks, physically or through calumny. A particular case where it was glaring that there was fraud, a strategy for subversion involved pointing out that “a member of this panel is an ex-police intelligence officer, a journalist, now hiding here as a lecturer. He will surely expose all of us if you carry on with this case”.
Obviously, those who live in glass houses are not meant to throw stones. So, a common strategy used by honourable thieves to subvert opening up cases of fraud is to generalize the cliché that “no body is clean in the society”. The claim or assumption that all Nigerians are corrupt is merely used as a calumny whereby a man of integrity can be smeared with accepting a gold wrist watch as a gift” or accused of lechery.
The case of Monica Lewinsky and a former President of the United States of America bordering on sex scandal, is an example of how calumny and corruption can be mixed up. Especially for us in Nigeria, sex-related scandals are ready means of calumny and demolition of personal integrity. Our security operatives have been known to be fond of using lechery and women as ready traps to catch those whom the system would want to rubbish and stain. A game of sanctimony!
There are more serious and clever cases of corruption in Nigeria which we gloss over than the penchant for parading “looters” as diversionary strategy. For example, in The Tide Newspaper of Wednesday May 22, 2019, the Prelate of Methodist Church of Nigeria, Dr Samuel Uche, said: “It beats our imagination that when you are the vilest offender in one party and cross over to a certain party, you become a saint over right”.
Is it not corruption that such practice as burying a white ram alive by 3.15 a.m. in which government officials are involved, should be associated with a democratic governance? Is it not true that tax-payers’ money is used to hire consultants or marabouts to carryout such weird rituals in dark nights? For what purposes are such rituals performed?
The irony of dark deeds is that when sharing of booties and loots result in estrangement and acrimony, old friends among gangs of thieves usually fall apart and reveal what was done in the dark. There are repentant thieves and other criminals who have become whistle blowers and revealers of dark deeds. There are shocking and weird stories about how security votes can be spent!
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer at the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
