Editorial

Reps: No To Show Of Shame

Published

15 years ago

July 5, 2010

Penultimate Tuesday, the Lower Chamber of the National Assembly, House of Representatives was turned into a battle ground of sorts as members engaged themselves in a free-for-all fight. The fracas, which saw some honourable members’ garments torn into shreds and beamed on national television to the shock and utter embarrassment of millions of Nigerians and many others across the world, was reportedly triggered off by a motion which sought to invoke Order 5 (1) Sub Rules 2 and 3 under Matters of Privilege in the House Rules, to wit, suspension of some members for alleged misconduct.

The affected members, under the aegis of the Progressive Minded Legislators, had prior to that day, petitioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), alleging corruption, high-handedness and impropriety against the House leadership. In addition, the faction had issued a seven-day ultimatum to the Speaker Dimeji Bankole-led leadership to resign using the media to vent their disfavours. These were said to have been done without prior attempt at exploring, all available conflict resolution rules spelt out by the House.

The Tide believes that members of the National Assembly are men and women of honour, integrity, public civility, self-respect, and above all, distinguished citizens, who ought to cherish and apply the rule of law in all their dealings. But the actions and bizarre conducts of our elected representatives on the floor of the House, has not only embarrassed their constituents, but indeed all Nigerians and has cast serious aspersions on the credibility of the Lower Chamber.

We say so because being, as right thinking Nigerians guided by one of the best democratic principles of modern-day civilization, the suspend 11, led by Rep Dino Melaye should have followed due process and procedure in pushing for the probe of the expenditures of the House budgets since 2008 without resorting to seizure of the House Mace, the legislative symbol of authority. For sure, if they had enough evidence that the Bankole leadership had corruptly enriched itself, and therefore, culpable of the allegations, they should have followed duly enshrined rules without recourse to disorder. They should have known that going for the mace during the full session of the House was an open call for acrimony and anarchy. If they are honourable members, as we thought they are, they should have respected the millions of Nigerians, who elected them to make laws and check the excesses of the Executive by conducting themselves in a peaceful and orderly fashion during the ill-fated session and thereafter proceed to the court of law in challenge of their suspension.

Honestly, The Tide feels particularly worried that at this time in our sojourn towards good democratic governance, our lawmakers would descend to a point of throwing decorum to the winds, and converting the Hallowed Chambers to such a disgraceful theatre of fisticuffs. This is shameful, and at the same time, painful.

It is shameful because our lawmakers are depended upon to symbolise dignity, integrity, respect for the rule of law, discipline and the highest qualities of exemplary leadership. They are, indeed, supposed to exhibit the banners and symbols of the best democratic practices that the younger generations of Nigerians should emulate. Their actions and conducts are painful because they tend to undermine the selfless struggles and sacrifices of our Heroes Past and present, especially the vibrant and the Nigerian media, whose efforts gave impetus to the emergence of this nascent democracy of which the Reps members are major beneficiaries. It is this shame and pain that we say “no more” to.

We, therefore, challenge the law makers especially members of the House of Representatives, to start working towards restoring discipline, integrity, confidence and credibility to the legislative arm of the nation. While we agree that as political animals, humans are bound to disagree on issues, we also reckon that sufficient safety nets do exist within our political structure to mitigate, moderate and resolve such differences without unnecessarily overheating the polity. The Tide urges the legislators to explore all available peaceful means to resolve any grievances in future in order to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate.

We, however, insist that the EFCC and ICPC should be thorough in their investigations of the allegations against the House leadership and results of their probes made public to Nigerians. In the end, those found wanting, if any, should be prosecuted in a court of competent jurisdiction. We also urge the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to advise its members holding political offices to realise that the power they enjoy is held in trust, and therefore, should exercise it with respect and reverence for the people.

Similarly, we implore members of the House of Representatives, and all others in the legislative arm of government, to resist at all times this spectre of shame and public embarrassment recently exhibited by the lower Chamber of the National Assembly, as such is a reproach to good governance. They should instead strive towards conducting themselves in a civilized manner and within the ambit of the law. This means playing the game according to the rules.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

4 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

4 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

3 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.