Opinion
Still On Agric Sector Revamp
If I can’t go to the farm as governor with the entire security around me, then who else can go to the farm? – Samuel Ortom, Benue State Governor. It is a known fact that many communities in the country are agrarian. Prior to the discovery of oil in Nigeria in 1958, agriculture was the mainstay of the nation’s economy. Different regions could boast of different cash crops like groundnuts, cocoa, rubber, oil palm produce and many more. Then, the country was a net exporter of food and earned most of its foreign exchange from agricultural produce.
However, with the discovery of oil, the agricultural sector was abandoned by successive governments. All attention was diverted to the new bride that was spinning money while the agricultural and infrastructural sectors of the economy were jettisoned.
But with the drastic reduction in oil price in the international market recently and its attendant consequences, there have been calls for the nation to go back to agriculture. Diversification of the economy became the talk of the day. Not a few individuals, alongside private and corporate organisations, heeded this call as more and more people began to invest in agriculture.
In Anambra State, for instance, renowned businessmen went into massive production of rice, tomatoes and all that. Governments at both federal and state levels have also shown readiness to diversify the economy and invest hugely in agriculture. Billions of dollars have been borrowed from different countries by the government for the purpose of revitalising the agricultural sector.
Incidentally, with the endless menace of herdsmen across the country, particularly in North Central, South East and South South zones, the idea of revamping the agricultural sector might just be unrealistic. Almost every day, we hear stories of the brutal attack of the herdsmen who would not spare any community that dares question the destruction of their farmlands and crops by their cattle.
Apart from the destruction of crops, they engage in armed robbery, abduction, raping, killing and all manners of crime.Today, most peasant farmers in the South East, South South, North Central, North West and some parts of South West can no longer engage in their daily farming activities for fear of being attacked by herdsmen.
I chatted with an acquaintance from Kaduna State recently who narrated how hard it is for people in her village, including her father, to feed because they can no longer carry on with their farming activities. She said her father is a well-known millet farmer who used to produce hundreds of bags of millet and corn in a year through which he generated a lot of income; but today,he depends on his children to put food on his table because he had been driven out of business by cattle herders who turned his farms to grazing fields for their animals. Painfully, she said, the farmers no longer report such destruction or farm invasion to the police for fear of being killed by the herders, coupled with their lack of confidence in the police.
A similar story was told by my nephew from Abi in Uzo-Uwani Local Government of Enugu State. He said his father and other family members who were big-time yam and cassava farmers are almost idle now because their farm lands have been taken over by suspected Fulanis.
Unfortunately, these poor farmers have been shouting, calling attention of the authorities to their ordeal. Security experts and many other well-meaning individuals have proffered solutions to incessant farmers-herders clashes, several articles have been written by journalists and other writers on the urgent need to address the ugly issue, all to no avail. Just as in the last weekend’s attack on Benue StateGovernor, Samuel Ortom, on his way back from his farm inspection, the Federal Government would order an investigation into some major attacks, the National Assembly would equally assure to look into the matter, the Police will claim to be on top of the matter but what has been the outcome of these? Has anybody or group ever been made to account for these deadly acts? Some weeks ago, President Muhammadu Buhari ordered a shoot-at-sight order for illegal possessors of AK-47. Have our security personnel leveraged on this to deal with the menace?
No doubt, the failure of current and past governments to address this problem all these past years has emboldened the herdsmen to carry on with the unbridled trampling on the rights of other Nigerians in their communities. It has continued to flame the ember of hatred among various communities, religions and tribes. One wonders how we can revamp the agricultural sector and achieve food security under the prevailing circumstance. A visit to the market will leave no one in doubt about the enormous problem in our hands. The price of virtually every food item is on daily increase. Provision of food and other necessities for their families is now a herculean task for many parents and we are not oblivious of the dangers this portends in any society.
Therefore, government should, as a matter of urgency, address the menace of herdsmen and rustlers across the country in order for agriculture to thrive and for us to have enough food to eat.
At this critical time when people are being encouraged to go into farming to ensure availability of food in the country and to curtail food importation, herdsmen should not be allowed to empty their cattle into cultivated farmlands and destroy crops and farmlands.
Most importantly, Nigeria should delay no further in toeing the line of developed countries who keep their animals in ranches. In no advanced country will you see cattle roaming freely on the properties of other people and causing problems for their countries. Both federal, state and local governments, even cattle owners who make money from this business, should join hands in establishing ranches and grazing reserves across the country and adopt other strategies to enable herdsmen settle to modern systems of livestock farming.
It is hoped that the barrage of condemnations that have trailed Ortom’s attack will result in government, at all levels, and the security agencies, taking adequate measures towards strengthening and improving security in the country. Traditional rulers, community heads, leaders of various ethnic groups and individuals should join hands in making our society more secure and safe instead of heightening the already tensed situation by their utterances, actions and inactions.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education16 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta16 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers15 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education16 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News17 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News17 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
