Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Nigeria And Politics Of Oil Blocks’ Allocation

Published

on

The distribution of assets, income, revenue opportunities and projects among the federating units that form the Nigerian state has remained the central focus of discourse in the country, in recent times. There has been a renewed clamour for increase in the level of equity in access to productive assets and distribution of the proceeds of production.
With Nigeria anchoring all budgetary revenue on the accruable proceeds from oil exploration from the Niger Delta, there are expectations of a commensurate economic development in the region to justify the huge sacrifice. However, the Niger Delta, nay Nigeria, is caught in the web of fundamental contradictions, linking global oil politics, that oil is mostly located in parts of the world different from where it is desperately needed.
This accounts for why the rustic Niger Delta communities from which oil is extracted rarely have access to it. Rather, the predominant feature of the Niger Delta has been unremitting pollution of the natural environment, agitation and conflicts. Thus, the Niger Delta has remained comparatively irrelevant in the main activity of wealth creation as a result of inactivity in oil production.
It is in contention of these sad realities that the recent disclosure by the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timpre Sylva, a Niger Delta son, that the Federal Government would conduct fresh oil block bid in 2020 has continued to generate reactions among critical stakeholders. While many applaud the decision as a bulwark to the development of the Nigeria oil and gas sector, others consider the decision as belated, given the fact that many oil blocks in the country have remained forlorn, while the ones mostly allocated were done based on vested interests and political patronage.
Pundits, therefore attributed the stunt in oil production and revenue generation in the country to these snags and imbalances in the allocation of oil blocks.
Although, the minister did not disclose the oil acreages that would be put out in the expected rounds, or processes to be adopted, he explained that the decision was not only to increase oil revenue but to also expand the space in the oil and gas sector by getting more people involved in the industry.
In apparent reaction to the planned oil blocks bid by the Federal Government, some stakeholders in the Niger Delta have advised the Federal Government to use the opportunity to address what they refer to as conspicuous denial of rights of indigenes of the oil rich region to own oil blocks.
A group known as Host Communities of Nigeria Producing Oil and Gas (HOSTCOM) in a reaction, cautioned against a repetition of the skewed processes that characterised previous allocation of oil blocks in the country, particularly during the military era, which it noted, “undermined the principles of due process and competitive bidding”.
National chairman of HOSTCOM, Dr Mike Emuh, who spoke with The Tide in an interview, said the Federal Government should allocate oil blocks to indigenes of the Niger Delta in the next rounds of bidding, to assuage the injustices and the brunts of oil politics which the people have suffered over the years.
He said: “despite the huge sacrifices the Niger Delta has made in the development of the Nigerian economy through their natural resources, the region still wallows in gross poverty and underdevelopment. The people of the Niger Delta are denied participation in the oil and gas sector through denial of oil blocks ownership, this negates the principles of natural justice. I am using the opportunity to call on the Federal Government to allocate oil blocks to the people of the Niger Delta as part of measures to address issues of under-development in the Niger Delta”.
Another stakeholder in the oil and gas sector and indigene of the Niger Delta, Comrade Inimgba told The Tide that the new bidding process should be able to address the anomalies in the allocation of oil blocks in the past.
He recalled that oil blocks allocation under the military era was not representative of the collective interest of all Nigerians because of the centralised command and discretionary system.
Inimgba, who is the chairman of the Port Harcourt branch of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association (IPMAN), said discretionary system of allocation of oil blocks amounted to the concession of the nation’s treasures and common wealth to few individuals.
He said: “The politics of oil blocks allocation in Nigeria has been highly contentious as it has not reflected the principle of equity and justice. Most of the people that benefited from the allocation in the past got their allocations on share compromise at the expense of other Nigerians, particularly the Niger Deltans. The idea that the people of the Niger Delta are not technically fit or experienced enough to play key roles in the oil and gas sector is totally erroneous and deceitful”.
He added that the Niger Delta has people who are qualified technically and otherwise to operate oil blocks.
In her views, an activist, Ann Kio Briggs, also raised concern over the injustices perpetrated against the Niger Delta in oil politics.
She said that the Niger Delta had always been at the receiving end of the oil economy, as the dorminant activities of oil production are carried out in the region, noting however, that the indigenes play barely, “passive roles while billions of petrol dollars are carted away from their land to develop other parts of the country”.
She pointed out that such politics of “exploitation, deprivation and exclusion” amounted to gross injustice and urged the Federal Government to give due consideration to the Niger Delta in the planned allocation of oil blocks.
Also in a reaction to the planned allocation of oil blocks by the federal government, human rights activist and fiery lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), said it was unconstitutional to allocate the nation’s oil blocks to a few individuals.
Quoting section 16(2)(c) of the 1999 constitution as amended, Falana in a letter to the presidency said the constitution prohibited the concentration of wealth in the hands of few individuals or group.
He noted that majority of the owners of the oil blocks belonging to the Nigeria people usually sublease them to offshore companies as they lack the fund and technical expertise to develop the oil and gas industry, and called for the revocation of such oil blocks and marginal fields.
The letter which read in part stated: “By merely collecting huge rents, the oil blocks owners become stupendously rich, while the federal, state and local governments, depend on loans and bail outs to pay salaries and carry out basic infrastructural development”.
Also, former Minister of State for Petroleum, Ibe Kachikwu, while speaking at the Nigeria oil and gas fair in Yenegoa, early this year, lamented that crude oil production in the country had been hovering around 1.9 million barrel per day over the past years.
Kachikwu noted that despite been a major oil producing country, Nigeria was yet to lead investors and producers that are operating across Africa, and emphasised the need for the country to explore its capacity to produce four million bpd of crude oil and abundant gas reserves to generate power.
Report shows that more than 50% of Nigeria’s oil and gas blocks remain untapped even as crude oil production continues to hover around 1.9 million bpd. Out of 390 oil blocks in the country, 211 are reported to be lying untapped due to non allocation by the Federal Government.
With many other countries are increasing efforts to ramp up their oil and gas production and reserves, industry experts have expressed concern over the lack of oil licensing rounds in Nigeria since 2008.
According to the institutional regulator of the petroleum industry, the Department of Petroleum Resources, (DPR), 179 blocks have been allocated as at December 2017, comprising 111 oil mining leases and 68 oil prospecting licenses.
It could be recalled that previous efforts to hold licensing rounds for major and marginal oil fields during the tenure of Dr Ibe Kachikwu as Minister of State for Petroleum Resources were not successful, as the recommendations were reportedly turned down by President Buhari.
Nigerians, however, look up to the planned allocation of oil blocks by the Federal Government in 2020 as an opportunity to address perceived imbalances in the oil economy.

 

Taneh Beemene

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

TotalEnergies, Conoil Sign Deal To Boost Oil Production

Published

on

TotalEnergies has signed agreements with Conoil Producing Limited under which to acquire from Conoil a 50 per cent interest in Oil Processing Licence (OPL) 257, a deep-water offshore oil block in Nigeria.
The deal entails Conoil also acquiring a 40 per cent participating interest held by TotalEnergies in Oil Minining Lease (OML) 136, both located offshore Nigeria.
Upon completion of this transaction, TotalEnergies’ interest in OPL257 would be increased from 40 per cent to 90 per cent, while Conoil will retain a 10% interest in this block.
Covering an area of around 370 square kilometres, OPL 257 is located 150 kilometers offshore from the coast of Nigeria. “This block is adjacent to PPL 261, where TotalEnergies (24%) and its partners discovered in 2005 the Egina South field, which extends into OPL257.
Senior Vice-President Africa, Exploration & Production at TotalEnergies, Mike Sangster, said “An appraisal well of Egina South is planned to be drilled in 2026 on OPL257 side, and the field is expected to be developed as a tie-back to the Egina FPSO, located approximately 30 km away.
“This transaction, built on our longstanding partnership with Conoil, will enable TotalEnergies to proceed with the appraisal of the Egina South discovery, an attractive tie-back opportunity for Egina FPSO.
“This fits perfectly with our strategy to leverage existing production facilities to profitably develop additional resources and to focus on our operated gas and offshore oil assets in Nigeria”.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

“COP30: FG, Brazil Partner On Carbon Emissions Reduction

Published

on

The Federal Government and Brazil have deepened collaboration on climate action, focusing on sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, and the reduction of black carbon emissions.
The partnership is anchored in South-South cooperation through the Brazil-Nigeria Strategic Dialogue Mechanism, which facilitates the exchange of ideas, technology, and policy alignment within the global climate framework, particularly the Paris Agreement.
The Executive Secretary, Amazon Interstates Consortium, Marcello Brito, made the disclosure during an interview with newsmen, in Abuja, on the sidelines of the 2025 COP30 United Nations Climate Change Conference, held in Belem, Brazil.
Brito emphasized that both nations are committed to global efforts aimed at curbing black carbon emissions, a critical component of climate mitigation strategies.
“Nigeria and Brazil are collaborating on climate change remedies primarily through the Green Imperative Project (GIP) for sustainable agriculture, and by working together on renewable energy transition and climate finance mobilisation,” Brito said.
“These efforts are part of a broader strategic partnership aimed at fostering sustainable development and inclusive growth between the two Global South nations,” Brito added.
TheTide gathered that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced an ambitious plan to mobilize up to $3 billion annually in climate finance, through its National Carbon Market Framework and Climate Change Fund, positioning itself as a leader in nature-positive investment across the Global South.
Represented by the Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, Tinubu made the announcement during a high-level thematic session of the conference titled ‘Climate and Nature: Forests and Oceans’
Tinubu stressed that Nigeria’s climate strategy is rooted in restoring balance between nature, development, and economic resilience.
Hosted in the heart of the Amazon, on November 10—21, the 30th COP30 conference brought together the international community to discuss key climate issues, focusing on implementing the Paris Agreement, reviewing nationally determined contributions (NDCs), and advancing goals for energy transition, climate finance, forest conservation, and adaptation.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

DisCo Debts, Major Barrier To New Grid Projects In Nigeria ……. Stakeholders 

Published

on

Energy industry leaders and lenders have raised concerns that the high-risk legacy debts of Distribution Companies (DisCos) and unclear regulatory frameworks are significant barriers to the financing and development of new grid-connected power projects in Nigeria.
The consensus among financiers and power sector executives is that addressing legacy DisCo debt, improving contractual transparency, and streamlining regulatory frameworks are critical to unlocking private investment in Nigeria’s power infrastructure.
Speaking in the context of new grid-connected power plants, during panel sessions at the just concluded Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) Power Conference, Senior Vice President at Stanbic IBTC Infrastructure Fund, Jumoke Ayo-Famisa, explained the cautious approach lenders take when evaluating embedded or grid-scale power projects.
Ayo-Famisa who emphasized the critical importance of clarity around off-takers and contract structures said “If someone approaches us today with an embedded power project, the first question is always: Who is the off-taker? Who are you signing the contract with?” . “In Lagos State, for example, there is Eko Electricity and Excel Distribution Company Limited. Knowing this is important,” she said.
She highlighted the nuances in contract types, whether the developer is responsible just for generation or for the full chain, including distribution and collection.
“Collection is very important because you would be wondering, ‘is the cash going to be commingled with whatever is happening at the major DISCO level, is it ring-fenced, what is the cash flow waterfall,” she stated.
Ayo-Famisa pointed out that the major stumbling block remains the “high leverage in the books of the legacy DisCos.” Incoming project financiers want to be confident that their cash flows won’t be exposed to the financial risks of these indebted entities. This makes clarity on contractual relationships and cash flow mechanisms a top priority.
Noting that tariff clarity also remains a challenge, Ayo-Famisa said “Some states have come out to clearly say that there is no subsidy; some are saying they are exploring solutions for the lower income segments. So, the clarity would be on who is responsible for the tariff, is this sponsored?, Can they change tariffs?, In terms of if their cost rises, they can pass it on, or they have to wait for the regulator.
“Unlike, what you find in the willing seller-willing buyer, where they negotiate and agree on their prices. Now they are going into grid, there is Band A, Band B, if my power goes into, say, Ikeja Electric, or I have a contract with them, “am I commingled with whatever is happening across their multiple bands?”
Also speaking, Group Managing Director and CEO of West Power & Gas Limited, Wola Joseph Condotti, stressed the dual-edged nature of decentralization in the power sector.
“Of course, decentralization brings us closer to the people as the jurisdiction is now clear. You also know that your tariff would be reflective of the type of people living in that environment. You cannot take the Lagos tariff to Zamfara, and this is what has been happening before now in the power sector. So, decentralization brings about a more customized solution to issues you find on the ground.
“Some of the issues I see are those that bother on capacity. It was a centrally run system that had 11 DISCOs. Of the 11 DISCOs, I think there are 3 or 4 of us today that are surviving or alive, if I may put it that way. If you go to electricity generation companies, they are doing much better,” she said.
Condotti highlighted regulatory overlaps as another complication, especially when power generation or distribution crosses state lines.
She said, “Investors would definitely have a problem. Say if you have a plant in Ogun State supplying power to another state, say Lagos State; you are automatically regulated by NERC. But the truth is that the state regulator of Ogun State and Lagos State wants you to comply with certain regulatory standards.”
With the growing demand for reliable electricity and an urgent need for infrastructure expansion, the ability to navigate these complex financial and regulatory landscapes would determine the pace at which new grid-connected power projects can be developed.
Continue Reading

Trending