Opinion
Revisiting Huge Governance Cost In Nigeria
The Rivers State Government once announced that with effect from 1979, past civilian governors would be paid some pension. The approval of such pension came at a time when there was a high rate of unemployment as well as speculations about an increase in the price of petroleum products. That was also a time when the masses began to see politics as a “carry-go” endeavour of predators.
Past governors and other categories of high-profile politicians in Nigeria cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be described as poor people, relative to the poverty level in Nigeria. The impression thus created in the minds of Nigerians is that the dividends of democracy and the process of governance are exclusive bonus and privileges of a few Nigerians.
Should politics not be about service delivery to the people and governance a social contract whose justification lies in cost effectiveness and responsible service delivery to the people? In this era of widespread hardship and mass unemployment, should Nigerian politicians and power holders not show genuine concern for the masses and the plight which they are going through?
In a situation where public servants are begging for a minimum wage of N30,000 per month, is it not true that some political office holders are taking home about 100 times that amount in one month? The rising cost of governance comes largely from the system of patronage and sinecure where there is a huge gap between productivity and remuneration. Is it not true that some radical military and other personnel, even in retirement, are being paid some “allowances” to keep them away from causing any agitation in the polity? Who’s afraid of radicalism?
A situation where there are too many political offices and appointments, with several advisers and spin-doctors, it is to be expected that the remuneration and maintenance cost of such a large retinue of opportunists would be quite high. No matter how rich a nation is, a large wage bill which is not backed up by productive endeavours of equivalent value, would definitely lead to some financial crisis sooner or later.
Let it be said loud and clear, the Nigerian political elite are not a productive class but opportunists who would rather share what is left of the proverbial “national cake” than bake new cake for posterity. If a state governor could demand that the state should build him a house in his village and another in an urban town of his choice, then local government chairmen can make similar demands too.
Yet, civil servants slave for 35 years earning minimum rather than living wages and retire with hardly any house to move into in their villages. A “carry-go” political culture gave rise to a number of corrupting influences in Nigeria, including the inordinate desire to amass wealth without giving an equivalent value in return.
Social instability is usually fuelled by injustices arising from faulty reward system, especially in public services. A situation where those who assume political power refuse to relinquish it largely because of juicy perquisites makes politics a “do-or-die” engagement. Part of the desire to cling on the power and wealth is the provision of pensions package for former political office holders.
The practice of recycling the same class of political gamblers gives the impression that Nigeria is engaged in a system of sinecure and patronage under the guise of politics. This is a fact liable to deepen the degree of alienation and despondency on the part of the masses. To create and sustain the impression that 80% of the people must scramble over 20% of politicians’ crumbs is a faulty system of democracy which leads to instability.
Failure of leadership in Nigeria is a reflection of our state of political maturity whereby politics is all about fighting to occupy offices rather than a process of serving the people. A political system which serves the power structure rather than people is not only a cult system but a recipe for social conflict and alienation.
Part of the restructuring that Nigeria needs now is to cut down drastically the cost of governance, especially the scandalous perquisites of political office holders. The current system is parasitic, to say the very least.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer at the Rivers State University, PH.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Maritime3 days ago
Minister Tasks Academy On Thorough-Bred Professionals
-
Maritime3 days ago
Customs Cautions On Delayed Clearance, Says Consignees May Lose Cargo
-
Maritime3 days ago
Lagos Ready For International Boat Race–LASWA
-
Maritime3 days ago
NCS Sensitises Stakeholders On Automated Overtime Cargo Clearance System
-
Maritime3 days ago
Shoprite Nigeria Gets New Funding to Boost Growth, Retail Turnaround
-
Politics3 days ago
I Would Have Gotten Third Term If I Wanted – Obasanjo
-
Sports3 days ago
Bournemouth, Newcastle Share Points
-
Sports3 days ago
Iwobi Stars As Fulham Overcome Brentford