Business
Registrars Bemoan SEC’s Zero Allocation
The Institute of Capital Market Registrars says the impasse between the National Assembly and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will affect capital market development. Dr David Ogogo, the Chief Executive of the institute, made the observation in an interview with newsmen in Lagos on Thursday.
Ogogo said that the non-allocation of funds to SEC in the 2013 budget would affect the implementation of various reports of the capital market committees.
He said that the impasse, if not resolved immediately, would thwart all efforts and initiatives by operators to stabilise the capital market. Ogogo said that the various reports of the committees submitted at the just concluded annual capital market retreat in Warri, Delta, would be fruitless if SEC failed to get budgetary allocations. According to him, the capital market ought to have stabilised in the third quarter of last year if the various reports and initiatives were funded and implemented. Ogogo, who is also a member of Dematerialisation Committee, said that the January 31 date for the launching of dematerialisation policy was no longer feasible due to the impasse.
He said that all the materials needed for the campaign would have been ready by now, but it was foiled by the stance of the National Assembly.
He, however, called for urgent resolution of the impasse in the interest of the capital market and the economy. Ogogo said that the institute would continue with its training and retraining programmes to ensure service delivery by all registrars in 2013. We recalled that the National Assembly has directed that the appropriations to SEC in the 2013 federal budget be withheld. This followed the decision of the National Assembly not to have anything to do with SEC until Ms Arunma Oteh, its Director General, is removed from office.
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.