Opinion
For A Decentralised Police Structure
At a time when many
thought an
accord had been reached on the state police subject among state governors
preparatory to the ongoing constitution amendment processes, a sudden turn
emerged when the Northern Governors Forum balked, and instead opted for an
amendment of section 215 of the 1999 constitution.
The Forum, which earlier supported the creation of state
police, now piles pressure on the federal government to tinker with section 215
in a manner that will empower them to control and manage poltice Affairs in
their states.
However, a cursory look at the issue reveals the pros and
cons in the arguments canvassed by both opponents and proponents of the
subject. The discourse on the necessity or otherwise of establishing a state
police may not cease until the skewed federal system the nation adopts is
redressed.
The truth is that if the prevailing security challenges
Nigeria faces must be tackled, there may not be an alternative to instituting a
state police.
That is why the position of the Northern governors is
discomfiting to their Southern counterparts and no less the common Nigerian.
Expectedly, it renewed public discourse on the issue. The question to be asked
is why state police? Why has it put on the garb of controversy?
This matter has become our flogged and authoritarian.
Whenever it is discussed, it raises rage, anxiety and fear. Understandably, the
current security remonstrance in the country has given rise to a renewed
age-long clamour for the introduction of state police to complement efforts by
the federal police to contain the pervasive crime rate in the country.
What then are the
issues? What are the contentions?
Proponents of state police argue that its institution will
enable state governors take effective control of security matters in their
respective states, against the present order where they enjoy the nomenclature
of chief security officers without corresponding coercive instruments.
Their second contention is that state police is a veritable
component of true federalism, and Nigeria cannot be an exception. They also
clamour for and indeed insist that it will enhance or promote community
policing.
These advocates of state police adduce further reasons to
the effect that if established, the institution will ensure equitable funding
of the force between the state and the federal government, which hitherto has
been solely funded by the federal authorities.
Conversely, opponents of state police insist that the nation
is unripe and immature to manage the police as governors and politicians are
inclined to abuse it and use the force to harass and intimidate political
opponents.
An added dimension to the untoward position of Northern
governors’ on the matter is their unwillingness to lose control of the current
police structure should states be authoritised to establish the force.
First, it must be admitted that the law enforcement system
of the country is inappropriate. Until this is remedied, the performance of the
police will worsen. Some Nigerians have summoned calls for proper funding,
equipping of the police to enhance their performance. This to my mind is not
the primary issue that plagues the police. What the force requires is a
comprehensive re-packaging , restructuring, remodeling and repositioning. It is
the absence of these that has caused the unabating outcry for a state police.
Truly, the inefficiency of the police has led to calls by
state governors for their own police force. However, an examination of the
positions of the proponents and opponents of state police discloses an abysmal
ignorance exhibited by both sides. It is clear that they lack understanding of
how a decentralized system of law enforcement operates.
Decentralization promotes specialization and efficiency. I
agree that decentralization, if unchecked, could lead to abuse and conflicts if
there are no guidelines. But to effect the policy, the political structure of
the country must be taken into account.
In a three-tier system of government like ours, the local,
state and federal governments must share the responsibility of law enforcement.
Therefore, local government council’s must take charge of municipal policing,
the state for state policing and the federal for federal offences and matters
that cut across state boundaries.
There must be guidelines and supervisory framework for the
operation of this system to succeed. An apolitical body could be established to
regulate the activities of the police in the various tiers.
The diversity of crimes committed in the country, and their
level of sophistication and execution, particularly those perpetrated by the
dreaded Islamist sect, Boko Haram, and militants in the Niger Delta have
combined to make the establishment of state police force desirable. They are
clear indications that the existing policing arrangement in the country has
failed. But this must be predicated upon the introduction of deep reforms in
our federal structure.
The current revenue allocation formula, for instance, has to
be abolished for fiscal federalism, while local government councils must be
given autonomy. The viability of a decentralized police structure can only be
ensured in a true federal system of government.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
Maritime2 days ago
Minister Tasks Academy On Thorough-Bred Professionals
-
Maritime2 days ago
Customs Cautions On Delayed Clearance, Says Consignees May Lose Cargo
-
Maritime2 days ago
NCS Sensitises Stakeholders On Automated Overtime Cargo Clearance System
-
Maritime2 days ago
Lagos Ready For International Boat Race–LASWA
-
Maritime2 days ago
Shoprite Nigeria Gets New Funding to Boost Growth, Retail Turnaround
-
Politics2 days ago
I Would Have Gotten Third Term If I Wanted – Obasanjo
-
Sports2 days ago
Bournemouth, Newcastle Share Points
-
Sports2 days ago
Iwobi Stars As Fulham Overcome Brentford