Connect with us

Opinion

Fans And Foreign Sports Patronage

Published

on

The craze by most Nigerians to watch foreign football clubs’ matches played on cable television is becoming a cause of worry to most enthusiast and football administrators. What with the empty stadia across the country, low turnout of spectators and fans at various sports centres, venues for local sports meets and competitions? I bet you, so many Nigerians now know more about foreign sports clubs and their players than their own local clubs and players. This is unfortunate!

A situation where Nigerian youths and adults are very ready to reel out the history, names of players of foreign clubs, like Barcelona, Real Madrid, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester United, Liverpool, Inter Milan, PSG, Bolton, Bayern Munich, Anderlecht, Manchester City, Lyon, Olympic Marseille, among others, is nothing but foolhardy. Shamefully enough, most of these youths and adults, cannot mention the names of Nigerian local clubs and players therein. They do not even know the names of the national club sides whether male or female!

Fine, some may argue that Nigerians and Africans also ply their trade in these foreign clubs, and therefore, see nothing wrong in having so much interest in the foreign club sides. They may also argue that the quality, level and standard of play displayed by these foreign club sides is very high and attractive. I agree with these arguments. I also agree that these club sides are that high in their performances because of the huge amount of money invested in them as well as the large patronage they receive in terms of spectators and fans.

Can anyone imagine the huge chunk of money spent and realized by these club sides in terms of sign-on fees, sponsorships, marketing rights, television transmission rights, endorsements, gate takings, and other patronages, as compared to our local club sides, which lack all of these incentives, sponsorships and investments? It is staggering!

True, football administration and management need to be greatly improved and taken a notch higher to raise the bar/standard of football in our various competitions. In fact, the National Professional League, the Challenge Cup, the Confederation of African Football (CAF) Champions League, West African Football Unity (WAFU) Cup, and the Africa Nations Cup, have not shown the touch of class that has been achieved by English, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Brazilian, Argentine and other South American and some Asian football club sides. We all reckon with that!

But that does not mean we must focus all our attention on these foreign football club sides at the detriment of our local clubs. They have developed and become strong because of the huge investment put in them by private business moguls, who strive for profit, and must do everything to get out the best in their players through winnings. They also commit to genuine integrated partnerships that work for the players, the club sides and their owners.

If the interest created and sustained in our domestic leagues would go a long way in increasing patronage, attract good private investments and marketing windows, and also improve the quality, style and level of players and the game of football in Nigeria, then, let us reverse the trend. Since there is a glaring co-relation between spectators/fans population, viewer interest and patronage as well as corporate sponsorships, endorsements, marketing rights, advertisement placements, and value of TV rights, then, we must galvanize our energies towards getting all these factors in place as a veritable means of boosting the game in Nigeria.

Of course, the various stadia and football facilities need to be greatly improved, especially since our football pitches are not well maintained as expected. The ambience and aesthetic beauty of the facilities, which contribute in no small measure in making the game attractive to spectators and fans, must be fixed. Even marketing rights of Nigeria’s Challenge Cup or Professional League matches can be issued to both local and foreign television stations so as to help popularize, and expose our domestic league and football players to the world.

Football has become such an international game of first choice that people from across boundaries, religions, languages and colours, are taking increasing delight in watching football matches of club sides, whether in their countries or not. I think that if Nigerian club sides are exposed to global football space, with improved investments, sponsorships, sign-on fees or endorsements, the quality of the game will be enhanced.

You can imagine the huge monies expended in terms of corporate sponsorships, endorsements, among others, by the telecommunications organisations such as MTN, GLO, Airtel, Etisalat, who promote big club sides like Barcelona FC, Manchester United FC, Chelsea FC, and a host of others at the detriment of our domestic club sides and teams, when they operate in Nigeria. Yes! Granted that virtually all these telecommunications companies are international conglomerates, they also have very strong customer base and revenue margin from Nigeria. In fact, most of them have their highest annual revenues from Nigeria. It is, therefore, unfortunate that they forget that those countries such as England, Spain, Portugal, Italy, France, Germany, will never encourage companies operating within their own vicinity to sponsor or patronize foreign football club sides at the expense of the local ones.

I think the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), Ministry of Sports and National Sports Commission (NSC) and the Federal Government must urgently seat up and address this matter. Methinks that legislation needs to be put in place to grant incentives to corporate bodies which sponsor sports activities while punishing those who take delight in encouraging capital flight through the sponsorship of foreign club sides or teams.

In fact, a given percentage of local content is required in their sponsorship template, failure of which government should withdraw their licenses. The football administrators and managers must reach out to all these big-time corporate football supporters and sponsors, and enlist their commitment to invest part of their budget for football advertisements to local league sponsorships. They must also show some level of efficiency and transparency in the administration of the game to attract support of corporate bodies in terms of sponsorships.

Now the issue of competence and expertise is very important here. Football administrators in Nigeria must develop their competences and skills in professional and technical football administration, coaching and management. They must know what is necessary, the tactical approaches at all levels of the game, as well as the politics that determine who gets what and who wins at what point. The crises bedeviling football administration and management in Nigeria should be quickly addressed to save the game from total collapse.

Sports administrators should make conscious and deliberate effort at developing football at the grassroots, particularly schools sports. It is not in doubt that Nigerians, especially youths love football. These abundant talents across the country should be harnessed, and put to useful purposes. I think, what is required is for these talents to be nurtured and shaped through grassroots talent hunts, coaching clinics, and mentoring opportunities. Establishment of secured and quality football pitches or fields, distribution of football kits, including balls should be encouraged, because this helps the youths to develop their football talents. It also builds the interest of the entire population in the game of football. There is no doubt that the existence of football academies in Brazil, Argentina, Spain, Germany, and Portugal, has helped these nations in their effort to grow the game to the level they are today.

I believe that to stem the tide in the dwindling fortunes of Nigeria nay Africa football, and arrest the lack of spectators/fans’ enthusiasm and interest in our domestic football games, we need to bring in the brains and best hands to manage and administer the round leather game as practiced all over the world. Square pegs must be put in square holes just as round pegs must be put in round holes. Indeed, the right experts with the technical knowhow, managerial skills and right attitude must be made to manage our football at all levels.

It is interesting to note that football is a money spinner and major foreign exchange earner for many countries. As such government and private sector investments would not be in vain if there are put into football activities in Nigeria. Nigerians are great football lovers, and would justify the huge investments through payment for various services aimed at promoting the game.

If football sponsorship increases, and spectators/fans population rise, obviously, revenue will double.

Coincidentally, the game has the capacity to create employment opportunities for thousands of Nigerians. It will also promote the unity of the country, and enhance other social and cultural relationships and interactions. Football has the potential to boost tourism, competitiveness, hard-work, industry, economic viability and peace. In fact, football helps to facilitate sustainable development of society. This is why all stakeholders need to act fast to get the game of football back on track in Nigeria.

Ayooso, a public affairs analyst, resides in Port Harcourt.

Samson Ayooso

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending