Editorial
NIHSA’s Alert: Bracing For More Floods
Speaking at the public presentation of the Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency’s (NIHSA) 2021 An
nual Flood Outlook (AFO) in Abuja, May this year, the Minister of Water Resources, Alhaji Suleiman Adamu, disclosed that communities in 28 states in the country stood the risk of experiencing varying degrees of flooding in 2021.
“The floods projections show varying severity across parts of the country. In summary, the 2021 AFO forecast indicates that 32 states, including the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), will fall within the moderate probable flood risk areas. It is expected from the forecast that 121 local government areas in 28 states will fall within the highly probable risk areas. The states surrounding Rivers Niger and Benue are, without doubt, going to experience severe flooding”, he said.
The minister who noted that floods are usually accompanied by health risks through contamination of potable water sources, expressed the fear that the effect of this year’s flooding might be exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic and therefore urged all the tiers of government, policy makers and every other stakeholders to take appropriate measures to avert maximum impact.
In the same vein, the Director General of the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA), Mr Clement Nze, last month, warned Nigerians to expect heavy flooding this year, listing Lagos and Ogun States as likely to experience further flood-related disasters.
Addressing a press conference in Abuja on Wednesday, July 28, the NIHSA DG said “As at today, flood disasters have occurred in many states, notably in Lagos Councils of Mushin, Shomolu, Victoria Island, Lekki, Marina; Keffi in Nasarawa, Onitsha in Anambra; Owerri in Imo; Aba, Abia; Ilorin and Offa, Kwara; Kaduna; Bori, Rivers; Ijebu Ode, Ogun; Asaba, Delta; Jalingo, Taraba; Gashua, Yobe; Ado Ekiti, Ekiti; Akure town, Ondo; Katsina; Maidugiri, Borno and Enugu. It must be pointed out that virtually all the flood incidents above were caused by poor drainage systems as localised rainfall generated the urban flooding. River flooding and coastal flooding are yet to set in”.
Mr Nze, therefore, urged states and local government councils, stakeholders, multi-national companies, public-spirited individuals and philanthropists to, without delay, swing into action with measures to prevent the danger ahead instead of waiting to rehabilitate victims.
Last Friday, in Akure, the Ondo State capital, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) sounded the alarm for Nigerians to brace up for imminent floods between the months of August and October this year.
Speaking with journalists after sensitising some residents on how to avoid flooding, the Director of Operations of NEMA in charge of Ekiti, Ondo and Osun States, Mr Olusegun Afolayan, said 28 states and 102 local government areas face the prospect of being flooded any moment from now due to impending heavy rainfall in the country.
“There is a prediction from NIMET in February, and Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) in May, informing us of impending heavy rainfall due to climate change and the Ozon layer that will lead to flooding”, Mr Afolanyan said, adding that rising water levels could also result when dams are opened to release water while Cholera outbreak resulting from drinking water contamination is a direct consequence.
Flooding is, no doubt, a yearly occurrence during the rainy season. However, a report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) states that extreme weather patterns caused by long-term global climate change increase the likelihood of floods while the Nigeria Metrological Agency 2021 seasonal climate forecast indicates that Nigeria is expected to experience unprecedented heavy down pours.
There is no doubt that the alarm bells being sounded by the various national and international agencies on the looming flood disasters in the country are to alert Nigerians, governments at all levels, relevant agencies and all stakeholders of what is to come with a view to getting them prepared to appropriately and adequately respond.
Across the globe, flooding is already causing calamitous damage with Germany and Belgium already losing more than 170 lives to the severe natural disaster. In Nigeria, the impact of flooding killed about 68 people, affected 320 LGAs in 35 states, including the FCT, displaced 129,000, destroyed houses and washed away farmlands. This year, 816 Nigerians across 26 states have already died from Cholera, a disease that is directly associated with flooding.
As noted by the relevant agencies with the impending floods, Nigeria faces critical food security challenges already compromised and complicated by the intractable security situation and the rampaging Covid-19 pandemic. An urgent spirited intervention from everyone concerned is, therefore, needed to save lives, mitigate social disruptions and ameliorate economic dislocations among the people.
The Tide believes that there is nothing anybody can do to stop the disaster waiting to happen from taking effect, but there is certainly a lot that can be salvaged with all hands on deck. The National Orientation Agency (NOA), the Federal Ministry of Information and its counterparts in the states and their corresponding organs in the local government areas must quickly swing into action and spread the message to all the nooks and crannies of the country, sensitising Nigerians and enlightening them on the appropriate things to do.
The emergency management and response agencies at all levels should be adequately equipped to live up to their responsibilities. Local government councils must be at the vanguard of desilting drains and opening up blocked water paths while taking seriously the issue of development control.
Finally, the people must be made to take personal responsibility to imbibe the culture of ensuring that drains and waterways are regularly cleared of debris while jettisoning the habit of throwing solid wastes in the gutters. Of course, the duty to contain the devastating effect of the predicted dangers of the 2021 flood season in the country is every Nigerian’s.
The prolonged suffering of Rivers State pensioners who have remained unpaid since retiring in July 2025 demands urgent executive and legislative intervention. The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has rightly put its finger on the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) as the root cause of this crisis. The state government must now bite the bullet, dismantle this failed experiment, and bring the pensioners’ protracted ordeal to an end.
Since July 2025, the affected retirees have been left high and dry, their monthly pensions unpaid, and their dignity worn away. The NLC, under the leadership of Comrade Alex Agwuanwon, has also linked this deplorable situation to the political storm that engulfed the state, while expressing cautious optimism that the prevailing calm will pave the way for the payment of outstanding arrears. The Tide shares that optimism. However, optimism alone will not put food on the table for men and women who gave the best years of their lives to the service of the state.
The genesis of this crisis is not shrouded in mystery. The CPS was introduced in Rivers State in 2012 under the administration of former Governor Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, pursuant to the Rivers State Pension Reform Law of that year. The scheme was ostensibly designed to bring the state into line with the federal Pension Reform Act of 2004, which had established a contributory framework for retirement benefits across the country. What was sold as a progressive reform has, in truth, become a millstone round the neck of the very workers it was meant to protect.
The CPS has failed in the state, and it has failed spectacularly. Its fundamental flaw lies in the government’s chronic inability, or unwillingness, to honour its counterpart funding obligations. The arrangement was meant to be a joint endeavour: employees contribute a portion of their salaries, and the employer matches it. But the state has consistently failed to keep its side of the bargain, leaving the pension fund anaemic and unable to meet its obligations. The result is as predictable as it is unconscionable. Retirees are left with only their own contributions to fall back on, a mere pittance that cannot see them through their twilight years.
The human cost of this institutional failure is staggering. Men and women who devoted decades to the civil service now find themselves cast adrift, their legitimate expectation of a secure retirement shattered. The psychological toll of such betrayal is beyond measure. A pension is not an act of charity. It is a contractual obligation, a deferred wage for services already rendered. To withhold it is to break a sacred trust. The authorities must understand that every delay in resolving this crisis costs lives, both in the literal sense as elderly retirees struggle to pay for healthcare and sustenance, and in the figurative sense as the social contract between the state and its workforce wears thinner with each passing month.
This development does not show the government in a favourable light. For a state to allow people who served it with dedication and integrity to languish in penury after retirement is morally indefensible. It sends a chilling message to serving civil servants that loyalty will be repaid with abandonment. This is precisely why organised labour must not rest on its oars. The NLC’s call for the termination of the CPS is not mere grandstanding. It is a necessary corrective. The scheme, as presently administered, is irredeemably broken and must be done away with.
The most damning indictment of the CPS since its inception is its one-sidedness. The government has failed to pay its counterpart funding, reducing the scheme to a hollow shell. Of what use is a contributory arrangement when only one party contributes? Retirees cannot be expected to live on the meagre sums they themselves set aside, sums which have been steadily eroded by inflation and administrative charges. Workers have been short-changed, left to carry the can while the government looked the other way. It is a quiet expropriation of their future.
The time to put this right is now in the interest of justice, equity, and fairness. The NLC should push harder for the swift implementation of its committee’s report to Governor Siminalayi Fubara. That report contains a sensible and pragmatic recommendation: that the CPS should apply only to those employed in the year it was enacted, thereby allowing existing civil servants to remain under the Defined Benefit Scheme (DBS) to which they were originally entitled. This is not a radical proposal. It is a reasonable compromise that recognises the legitimate expectations of long-serving workers and rights the wrongs of the past.
The authorities must act with dispatch. Governor Fubara should, without further ado, send a draft amendment of the Pension Law to the House of Assembly for passage into law. With such legislative intervention, those who retired from July 2025 to date would be returned to the DBS, receiving pensions calculated on their terminal salaries and years of service rather than the paltry sums available under the failed contributory arrangement. The NLC, for its part, should keep its foot on the pedal through dialogue, advocacy, and, if necessary, peaceful protest. Pensioners deserve not just fine words but concrete action.
Rivers State cannot lay claim to be progressive while its retirees are forced to go cap in hand for their rightful entitlements. The measure of any civilised society is how it treats its elderly. By that yardstick, the present situation is a blot on the state’s escutcheon. The government must clear the backlog of arrears, scrap the CPS for the category of workers it should never have applied to, and restore the DBS in full. Nothing less will suffice.
The incident underscores the wider problem of unregulated and adulterated drinks across Nigeria. From roadside kiosks and motor parks to informal markets, unverified alcoholic and herbal products are readily available, often marketed as cheap alternatives or medicines. The World Health Organisation estimates that about 25 per cent of alcohol consumed globally is unrecorded. Such products operate outside formal regulatory control and may expose consumers to toxic substances and serious health risks.
The problem is compounded by deliberate evasion of regulatory requirements. Products under NAFDAC’s mandate must be registered and subjected to regulatory checks before manufacture, distribution, or sale. Yet some producers ignore these requirements for profit, while others falsify NAFDAC registration numbers and markings and use them on substandard products. Such practices deceive consumers and undermine public confidence in the regulatory system.
The reported arrest of 15 suspects linked to the Ondo distribution network is an important first step. Those found responsible should be prosecuted and, where convicted, appropriately punished. However, enforcement must go beyond responding to tragedies. NAFDAC should strengthen preventive measures through regular post-market surveillance, random testing at transit points, and intelligence-led inspections of informal production centres.
Consumers also have a responsibility to exercise caution. Economic hardship, high inflation, and declining purchasing power have created opportunities for unscrupulous producers to market cheaper but potentially dangerous products. Consumers should, therefore, avoid unlabelled drinks, suspiciously cheap products, and goods sold through unverified outlets. Public education and consumer vigilance can help deny unscrupulous traders the opportunity to put profit before human life.
The danger extends beyond alcoholic and herbal drinks to medicines. Counterfeit and substandard medicines have entered both formal and informal supply chains, causing treatment failure, poisoning, and avoidable deaths. The WHO estimates that at least one in 10 medicines in low and middle-income countries is substandard or falsified, although the prevalence varies. Ensuring the safety and authenticity of medicines is essential to protecting lives and maintaining confidence in the healthcare system.
Food safety is another concern. Poor practices in food handling, processing, and preservation expose consumers to serious health risks, particularly when commercial interests override safety. Concerns over the improper use of chemical agents such as calcium carbide to accelerate the ripening of fruits further demonstrate the need for stronger monitoring throughout the food-supply chain.
These challenges expose weaknesses in Nigeria’s regulatory system and reinforce the need to strengthen it. NAFDAC faces the enormous task of monitoring products across all 774 local government areas. Meeting this challenge requires greater operational capacity, reduced bureaucratic delays, and modern systems capable of tracking regulated products from production to the point of sale.
Inadequate personnel, laboratory facilities, equipment, and logistics remain major obstacles. NAFDAC field offices, especially those serving remote communities, need modern testing equipment, reliable screening tools, and adequate transportation. The Federal Government should provide sustained funding to recruit specialised personnel, upgrade laboratories, and deploy technologies capable of rapidly detecting dangerous substances such as methanol.
Preventing the spread of adulterated products also requires coordinated action by federal and state governments. The Federal Ministry of Health, NAFDAC, and other relevant agencies should intensify operations to remove unregistered alcoholic and herbal products from motor parks, transit centres, and informal markets. The National Assembly should review existing laws and strengthen penalties for deliberately producing, falsifying, or distributing toxic and unregistered food, beverages, and medicines.
NAFDAC should expand its digital verification systems to enable consumers to confirm product registration before purchase. State ministries of health, local government councils, and community institutions should intensify grassroots education on the dangers of unlabelled drinks, unsafe food practices, and counterfeit medicines. Traditional, religious, and community leaders can also help identify and report illegal production and distribution activities.
The Ondo tragedy must not become another statistic that is quickly forgotten. The loss of 48 lives and the permanent blindness suffered by some survivors are devastating and unacceptable. Nigeria must respond by strengthening regulatory institutions, providing adequate funding, enforcing the law, and educating the public. A sustained, coordinated effort is essential to protect the nation’s food, beverage, and medicine supply chains and prevent another tragedy caused by products that should never have reached the market.