Opinion
Pedagogists And Andragogists
With further inquiries coming from readers of previous articles on teachers and professionalism, here are some hints that may address the questions of such readers. The task or career of teaching needs to be separated from the profession of educating. Similarly the task or calling of educating falls into two categories, namely: Pedagogy and andragogy. One takes place in a formal, institutionalized setting, while the other is not restricted to time, place or regulational rigours or structures. Personal experiencing is quite vital.
An educator is either a pedagogist or an andragogist, or both in many cases. A pedagogist is a trained professional not only in the skills but also the calling of ennobling the status of humans in organized classroom setting. Subject matter merely serves as the peg and starting point in the actualisation of this task. The process is a task because it involves the application of definite rules of engagement. Such rules of engagement are embodied in the professional training package.
Amdragogy is a less restrictive means of bringing about the same goal of ennoblement of the status of humans via the instruments of personal experiencing and interactions. The philosophy of andragogy has a slogan of “each one, teach one”. This slogan also stipulates a definite condition namely; educate or teach via the instrumentality of exemplary conduct and character. Truly, example is better than precepts. Apprenticeship is included.
Going by the 4 pillars which serve as the goals of the United Nations Organisation: Development, Equal Rights, Peace and Security, mission statement becomes available for pedagotists and andragogists. With regards to the 1st Pillar of development, first item in the mission statement is “To dispel darkness in a cleansing process and strengthen the light in an upbuilding process”.
Whether or not humanity is addressing this task effectively and earnestly, it remains true that development is a cleansing and upbuilding process. Not many of those who engage in politics, teaching and the task of development are well acquainted with this mission statement of cleansing and upbuilding component. The task of human upbuilding entails kindling some light where there is darkness, and strengthening the light by identifying and enhancing what is noble in humans. Obviously there’s nobility in humanity!
In this upbuilding sense, the pedagogists and the andragogists are regarded as physicians whose duty it is to identify and build upon what is good in humans. Neither are they meant to tear and destroy but transform and reform those who succumb to darkness. Thus the task of human upbuilding and development, including transformation of wrong desires, demands deep spiritual understanding. Those who are not called and groomed for such noble undertaking would hardly be in a position to discharge such task effectively. Those who dabble into such duty for the purpose of earning a living achieve but quite a little.
Such human upbuilding and developmental tasks involving pedagogy and andragogy include education, journalism, politics and such other activities which seek to transform and build up human personality and character. A technical or professional term for such activity is “Conscientisation”. Thus there can be no genuine development or education without conscientisation which Paulo Freire (1970) defined as concern for human values and ennoblement.
From the perspective of education, the goal of conscientisation can be addressed in the formal, informal and nonformal settings. For the success of such venture, there are 4 pillars that must feature, namely: skill acquisition, cultivation of human values, social adjustments and physical fitness. Therefore, an all-round education covers technical, aesthetics, social and biological aspects. Without an educator being groomed in these skills, a teacher is merely an amateur, trying to earn a living.
For the journalist serving as an agent of change, it is not enough to “inform, educate, entertain and conscientise”; there is a need also to be groomed in the ideals and requirements of such profession. For the pedagogist, subject matter serves as the peg for his task, but for the journalist, news event serves as his peg for social transformation. To be an effective agent of change, the task of journalism is not to report that a man was bitten by a dog, but to use such event to do as much enlightenment as professional skill can delve into.
Obviously, involvement in politics is involvement in the task of social change and conscientisation of the human population. What we find more common is a situation whereby politics becomes a scramble of who gets what in a society. Thus, from this angle the politician, without being called an audragogist, still remains an agent of change. The large-scale influence of politics on everybody makes it imperative that those engaged in it should have some serious grooming and orientation.
A situation where money, influence peddling and sponsorship by god-fathers are the means of coming to limelight, can rarely bring the best people into politics. Moreover that field of activity has become so tainted that decent persons avoid going into it. It has become necessary at this stage that the image of politics as a gangsterist engagement should be changed to what it really should be. The task of social transformation is a noble one, meant for people of noble character.
Since politics is an upbuilding task, activities involved therein cannot be that of sharing booties, loots or national cake, but that of social impact through the instrumentality of exemplary character. Rather than precepts, preachment and display of power and wealth, let politicians and clergymen and women be seen as the andragogists that they truly are. Let them make social impact via exemplary character. We need positive change now. A transformation!
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

Opinion
When Global Peace Hangs In The East

Opinion
Balancing Religious Freedom and Community Rights

Quote:”Communities have rights to peace, safety, and quality of life. Noise pollution, crowds, or other impacts from religious activities can affect these rights. Balancing these interests requires consideration and dialogue”.