Opinion
Rivers Museum And Tourism Development
Rivers State, aside from its rich oil deposits and the associated resources currently being tapped, is replete with yet untapped humongous potentials in the tourism sector. The natural vegetation of mangrove splendour, tidal flow, falling and rising billows along the coastal line, the rare and exotic fauna in the ecosystem like the elephant found in Andoni, and other endowment bequeathed by nature are veritable avenue for development of eco-tourism.
Better still, the rich cultural traditions as symbolised by the colourful and scintillating revelries, ancient relics, costumes, local technologies, sacred sites, grooves and ancient architecture could be systematically harnessed to pave way for improvement in the area of cultural tourism. These two broad dimensions of tourism are by no means the elastic bounds of tourism development in Rivers State.
The priceless cultural resources that abound in Rivers State cannot in themselves constitute tourism attraction or sites. They need to be preserved and well packaged by professional curators (museologists) and other ancillary professionals in the museum practice. The cultural objects, antique natural curiosities, or sites vis a vis information accompanying them must be systematically interpreted and professionally presented to communicate desired information and exude the expected impression on the museum public.
Thus, a musem concerns itself with tangible and intangible cultural heritage of a given people within its scope and collection policies. The relevance of museum to societal development especially as it relates to tourism and education cannot be wished away.
It is at this point that the Rivers State Museum comes to the fore. The realisation of the unassailable importance of a state owned citadel of culture preservation and education probably informed the setting up of the Museum Management Committee, which was inaugurated in January, 1993 and headed by the renowned Professor of History Prof. E. J. Alagoa by the Government of Rivers State under Chief Rufus Ada- George. The administration of Ada-George, which established the committee was short-lived. However, it was able to embark on the collection of cultural objects of historic importance across the state. It accordingly mounted temporary exhibition with the theme “Government of Rivers State, Yesterday and Today.”
The museum was an interesting site then. Visitors to the museum had some interesting things on display to view. I visited the museum and was guided through the exhibition by its officials. After the initial laudable start, the whole vision of the founding fathers was slung to the wind. What went wrong is an apt question that needs comprehensive answer.
Investigations have proved that the Rivers State Museum lacks the statutory backing in terms of enabling edit or law. The stance of International Council of Museums (lCOM) on the need for enabling legislation for any museum does not overtly or covertly court any ambiguity or misinformation.
ln its authoritative book “Running a Museum: A Practical Handbook,” ICOM states that, “There should be a written and published constitution, statute or other public document, which accords with national laws. This should clearly state the standing of the institution, its legal status, mission, permanence, and non-profit nature.”
The Alagoa Committee’s direction in this regard was clear. It purposed to surmount the limitation imposed by the absence of an enabling law on Rivers State Museum by coming up with a proposed edict which was never enacted by succeeding military regime.
However, under Decree No. 7 of 1977, which establishes the National Commission for Museum and Monuments (National Museum), the establishment of State museum is allowed. Yet, this decree is not a substitute for state law which would have taken care of every datail ranging from corporate goals, administrative structure to personnel requirements, etc. as contained in the proposed edict by the Alagoa’s Committee.
The implication of this state of affairs is that the required autonomy for Rivers State Museum in all ramifications has over the years been trampled upon and completely eroded either by commission or omission. In the area of funding, the museum is tied to the apron strings of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism with regard to the release and spending of budgetary allocations. The whims and caprices of the often described supervising ministry would with all certainty come to play.
To be continued
Hart wrote in from Port Harcourt.
Ama M. Hart
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
